There is no correlation between your two sentences. There are lots of biological things where no gene has been found.
Because to some people, writings that are moderately older than the Constitution are more important than the rights of living, breathing human beings.
I know of a few homosexual people who married the sex that they weren't naturally attracted to and had kids. Hope your post wasn't serious.
This is one of those issues where I can't see the opposing side. Most of the time, even if I passionately disagree, I will still understand where the opposition comes from. Not with marriage equality. Quite simply, if someone is against gay marriage, I judge them. Harshly. I think that people who are against gay marriage have a moral blight on their character, because it indicates a basic lack of empathy for the suffering of others. I have a lot if gay friends, and it hurts me to see that their loving relationships can't be realized to the fullest extent. This is an open and shut case. History will also harshly judge the opponents of gay marriage.
Is this after God makes sure all the children who died young and never even lived their lives have a secure spot in the kingdom of heaven Or before He defeats Satan in an intergalactic game of Connect Four?
So if you haven't found something, it doesn't exist (not that biological would require a specific gene)? Interesting...
No, I don't think so. Are churches required to marry anyone ? Pretty sure they could say no to anyone they want....no matter their sexual orientation.