[ClutchFans] Jeremy Lin, James Harden, Chandler Parsons after 100-91 loss to Pacers

a link to that quote would be great if you can provide it.

hopefully harden is not getting tired of the attention lin gets. if so, lin is as good as gone.

but i wouldn't be surprised if that was the case. it's easy to assume stuff like this would happen when the most popular player on the team is not the best player on the team. jeremy may have to deal with this everywhere he goes.

 

Sorry. He'd be less exposed defending the perimeter dude in the corner, whoever that is, SG, PG, or SF. The dude standing in the corner. Harden should be defending him.

 

Ever heard of 'it's not what you say but how you say it'? Being professional? How about "Actions speak louder than words".

Get over yourself, unless you are still in grade school, half the people here understand the implications of professionalism.

 

Sorry man, just google it - it's in one of those post game interviews.

 

Your full of crap comment is just that. Lin had a 3 game streak of 20+ pts recently and 2Pat, Morris, TD, etc were already gone. PUHLEASE. Cut the BS about "the problem on this team is not Lin." It is exactly the problem. Lin's fake offensive prowess in NY is not real and can't help Harden out at all. Harden has to do everything on his own cause everyone NO ONE can step up on the offensive end, execpt for Parsons and he's inconsistent too but not as horrible as Lin.

 

When are these LOFs stop spreading propaganda that Lin has nothing to do with how bad this team is performing. No, ít's not all on McHale and Harden.

 

http://www.nba.com/rockets/video/2013/03/20/Harden032013mp4-2419573

 

LOL, the party is over.:grin:

 

Africa? What?

My argument is: you tried to shoot down otisthorpe3, saying he couldn't understand the players, as if you could; but you don't understand the players more than anyone else on this board.

I asked you to explain the players' problems which you claimed otisthorpe3 couldn't grasp, and you didn't explain anything. Instead, you went to "the poor in Africa" for some reason. . . . Very weak.

 

It's not "NO ONE can step up on the offensive end". It's Harden ISO ball that cost the game. Harden is just the God in you HOF/LOH's eyes.

 

Harden avg 26 pts on a team that avg 106. It's clearly all Harden, right? How about showing trust in your teammates and keep passing. Lose as a team and grow from it, instead of losing by one person trying to play hero ball.

 

wow, two questions, one for lin and one for bev. the way to approach the two questions looks very different.

 

Hey, did you ever find the "finger pointing" that you accused me of before you bailed on the Pacers game thread? Please go find evidence to show that you don't disrespect people for no reason.

How many times do I need to ask you to stand up for your word? You can't just say bad things about posters and then run away when they ask you for evidence. Show that you don't run away from your claims when someone challenges you after you disrespect them.

As for the questions in the video: you'll notice that the one about Beverley was specific to one game in the immediate past, and the question about Lin was about any possible game in the future. Yeah, different questions. I agree with you here.

 

please ask clutch to give me the power to search all your junk.

 

Aw, did Clutch steal your balls?

I'll help you.

You saw me "finger pointing," supposedly, just last night. And you stated that on this page: http://bbs.clutchfans.net/showthread.php?t=236038&page=107

Now, it will be easy for you to locate my "finger pointing" where you saw me doing it less than one day ago, somewhere on or before page 107 of the Pacers game thread.

Show everyone you're not full of ****.

 

Daaamn **** gets ugly in here after a loss.

 

You can search clutchfans with google. Painful to wade through stuff, but it can be done.

 

coz your stupidity, i had to spend time to search one page by one page.

you mentioned in the game thread that when lin went out we were already down 22-9 so don't blame mchale. so whom should be blamed? i guess lin is easy name to type. you pretty much repeated your statement again and again and again in case no one notice lin is in your sentence. what about parsons went out, we were down even further 25-10? of coz, you forgot we have parsons too. you blamed our starters but only wrote lin. i don't think lin means all starters.

 

thx.

 

A quote would help prove your point. Again, I am the only one using evidence, while you have never provided any.

That the score was 22-9 when Lin went out is a fact. That's not an argument.

We outscored the Pacers 82-81 after that moment, too: fact.

Lin and DMO are named because the subject of my original post was that McHale's use of the second unit worked out OK (82-81), we just couldn't overcome the disaster that happened with the starters. I said the crucial point in the game was the period of the first two substitutions, of DMO and Lin, two starters. I showed that by pasting the play-by-play.

No one needs to be blamed. Look at your own words. You're looking for someone to blame, not me. This is all I said: