First Look at Hugh Jackman as The Wolverine

This look like total ****. Didn't expect them to go with this totally r****ded modern Japanese takes on Wolverine. **** Hollywood for not having any creativity. Are they afraid to send Wolverine back in time to the Feudal Japan?

Anyone who think the first Hulk was total **** doesn't know **** about movies. The Incredible Hulk, now that was total **** directed by a b-rated director.

 

Incredible Hulk was better. You're basically the only person on the planet who liked Ang Lee's better. OoOooOooooO gamma dogs...good villain...

 

Gamma dogs **** all over the Incredible Turd. Louis Leterrier can't direct worth ****. How old are you? 16?

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/pQlEr20uhv8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

lol exactly..

He seems to hate on any popular movie. Not arguing against Wolverine though as it looks pretty **** quality to me so far. I wonder what Aronofsky would have done with this movie. Though, i'm glad he is doing Noah anyway.

 

looks terrible, sigh... will still watch

 

Count me as two. Ang Lee's Hulk was a mess but it was the mess of a master filmaker. New Hulk was just basic.

 

Well, Japanese culture was just a b*stard "adoptation" of another culture anyway.

 

This is based on the Wolverine miniseries by Chris Claremont and Frank Miller from the early 80s, which was Wolverine's first solo comic. It takes place in modern (at the time) Japan.



That really crappy poster looks like it was an attempt to reference this image:

 

Yeah, I'm 16 because you're an idiot. That works out great...I think I've put off blocking you for far too long.

 

Thought the same thing. I guess it was too hard to photoshop all of that action.

 

Um yeah, Ang Lee's Hulk was indeed better than the recent one. That one was crap.

 

I agree, the only good thing about the newer Hulk movie was Norton outside of that it was totally forgettable. Lee's at the very least tried something inventive, it didn't work but it's was an interesting experiment.

 

I honestly don't remember anything about that movie except that the CGI was surprisingly bad. I think I remember a scene where he's in some residential neighborhood and smashes up someone's house? I saw it in theaters but haven't seen it since. I'll download it sometime and give it another shot.

 

The Cgi was okay for its time. My problem with Norton's Hulk was that it was so cliché. It's your typical superhero movie that doesn't try anything different and fails miserably at it.

 

The first half of the first Hulk was really good but I felt it completely fell apart and i still scratch my head at the ending. It wasn't bad, but certainly wasn't that good.

I think the norton hulk was better, overall. It didn't try something different as the other but it also didn't fail in doing what it did.

 

Yeah, once the hulk started leaping around like a flea, it was so horrible.

I remember in the theater at the time there was a little kid watching it with his parents. When the hulk started leaping around, kid said, "This is dumb. Can we go now?"

Maybe this is the right clip:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dfgGadRXwEA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

I slightly preferred the 2nd Hulk, but it was about like how I slightly prefered the first Fantastic Four movie to the other bad super hero movies on the list. I may not have completely hated them, but I don't really care to watch them again either.

 

Ehh this will hold me over until Days of Future Past comes out.

 

he always seemed too tall. i'm a cartoon wolverine person from the late eighties early nineties.

 

You could always cast Tom Cruise to play Wolverine....