Is Jeremy Lin the next...just kidding...does Chandler Parsons = Paul George 2.0?

George is the #1 option on his team while Parsons is the #2/#3 option on some nights...gotta look at the role's cause the #'s dont tell the whole story IMO

 

He doesn't deserve to be at this point in his career

 

Really? He's one of the few players on the Pacers roster who can actually score the basketball. And he brings the great defense, so he doesn't detriment theie greatest strength. They are one of the best teams in the NBA, and he is a big reason why.

 

More then a Guy with 2 last names?

 

George can't shoot a lick 42% shooter from the floor. averages a couple more points and boards...whatever, grass is always greener on the other side for clutch fans. I guess he's better because he's black lol!Give me Parsons contract and productivity any day of the week,

 

:grin:

 

Paul George is going to be the next chandler parsons.

Parsons is one of my favorite players, but I'd say George will still be better. It's not like he's our star though, he's more of the third option

 

They both are very cute.... in fact Paul George might be the only man in the nba more attractive than Wade and Parsons.

 

Parsons has the perfect skills to be a post player at the 3 position. His natural shooting form involves a fade. Chandler needs to get stronger and become more of a post threat at the small forward position. Work on that step back fade and he will become much better. He is way too slow to beat people off the dribble.

 

Let's just trade Parsons for George straight up. Seems reasonable.

 

Heck I'd do Asik, Parsons, MoNtiejunas and perhaps Jones for Peorge.

They'd still decline.

 

besides Kyle Korver. everyone likes Kyle Korver.

 

That is actually a very attractive package to the Pacers, but Asik being the best player from the Rockets on that trade, wouldn't be as important to Pacers who have Hibbert.

They wouldn't listen to offers - not including Harden - for George anyway.

 

basically. it's pointless to speculate on these types of deals because teams don't trade their young stars for role players/depth, even great role players.

There has to be a money issue or some other issue for that to happen.

 

You're right.

Harden *cough*




BTW, I would assume George is one of the least likely players for the Rockets to attain. So, I agree. I'm just being sarcastic. I understand Indiana's situation is WAY different than OKC's. George would be the last player they trade.

 

Why settle for George if we can get LeBron in 2014.

 

Why not both

 

Paul George can create his own shot in ISO plays, but that was added recently. He worked on his post up fadeaway shot over the summer and he's become money$ with that shot.

I wish Parsons can learn something like that from Hakeem or C. Dawson, but he doesn't seem to have the physical tools for a back to the basket game. Needs to gain more muscle .

 

*cough*

 

I know. I was joking from the start (Parsons for George).