1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Astros sign Carlos Peña

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by tellitlikeitis, Dec 17, 2012.

  1. tellitlikeitis

    tellitlikeitis Canceled
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    20,659
    Likes Received:
    13,924
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Carlos Pena agrees to terms with Astros. One year, $2.9 million, plus $1.4 million in incentives. <a href="http://t.co/dKXx0u26" title="http://cbsprt.co/U7yu1R">cbsprt.co/U7yu1R</a></p>&mdash; DKnobler (@DKnobler) <a href="https://twitter.com/DKnobler/status/280728365437169664" data-datetime="2012-12-17T17:37:12+00:00">December 17, 2012</a></blockquote>
    <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
     
  2. No Worries

    No Worries Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    32,997
    Likes Received:
    20,814
    Carlos Pena?

    600 ABs, .197 BA (Mario Mendoza says hello), .684 OPS, 19 HRs, 34 years old, 225 lb.

    Meh.

    $2.9 large doesn't buy much.
     
  3. tellitlikeitis

    tellitlikeitis Canceled
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    20,659
    Likes Received:
    13,924
    Pena has hit below .200 in 2 of the last 3 seasons.
     
  4. No Worries

    No Worries Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    32,997
    Likes Received:
    20,814
    Pena might have Mario Mendoza on speed dial?
     
  5. sealclubber1016

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    21,521
    Likes Received:
    35,000
    This doesn't seem like a luhnow move, sign a guy with solid HR numbers but nothing else. Pena sucks by any measurement and will soon turn 35 no reason to think bounceback.

    This also almost assures no Berkman.

    Really hate this move, first time I've said that about a Luhnow move. Would rather see Freiman, J.D., and Wallace platoon the D.H. position than give PA's and money on this guy.

    Maybe he'll surprise and post numbers close to 2011, but he has sucked 2 of the last 3 years. I understand to vet you can maybe flip at the deadline, but Hafner or Puma would have been better IMO, must have been asking too much.
     
  6. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,941
    Likes Received:
    39,958
    Don't understand. Isn't Wallace the 1st baseman when the season starts and JD is an outfielder with a starting job? DH gets a lot of at bats.

    There's a chance Pena bounces back to be somewhat respectable. .230 with good power and walks. That's something that could be flipped at the deadline to a team that needs power to replace an injured player or something.
     
  7. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,941
    Likes Received:
    39,958
    Do the Astros have a young player that can hit that is being blocked at a position?
     
  8. leroy

    leroy Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    27,420
    Likes Received:
    11,335
    Seems like a move that could have waited until January or early Feb to see if a deal with Berkman could have been done. What's the hurry?
     
  9. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,669
    Likes Received:
    7,227
    Hate the signing. I don't understand it at all.

    Castor, can you move these Pena posts to a new thread?
     
  10. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,685
    Likes Received:
    25,944
    I don't get this one at all. This feels like an Ed Wade move for Pedro Feliz.
     
  11. Aceshigh7

    Aceshigh7 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,902
    Likes Received:
    258
    Truly horrible move. Very little upside. Wanted Puma..
     
  12. Aceshigh7

    Aceshigh7 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,902
    Likes Received:
    258
    Astros could have signed Jason Lane a heck of alot cheaper to do the exact same thing Pena will: strike out alot and hit 10 to 15 home runs...
     
  13. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,265
    Likes Received:
    134,341
    Pena is a move just to say they did something. They hope he rebounds and can be dealt at the deadline. They just don't want to lose 125 games.
     
  14. REEKO_HTOWN

    REEKO_HTOWN I'm Rich Biiiiaaatch!

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    47,529
    Likes Received:
    19,678
    Puma wants real $$$. He'll get $5 mil from someone.
     
  15. Aceshigh7

    Aceshigh7 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,902
    Likes Received:
    258
    I agree, $5 mil sounds about right for Berkman. The puzzling thing is, that's close to what Pena will be getting (if he reaches incentives). Would have made more sense to sign Berkman for that money assuming his knee is in decent shape. (And the reports i've read are that Luhnow hadn't even had his planned December meeting with Berkman yet).

    This feels like an Ed Wade type of move, unfortunately..
     
  16. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,265
    Likes Received:
    134,341
    Didn't want Pena and do not want Puma... this isnt 2005. Play the young guys and not waste at bats on players that will be retired by the time the Astros are a .500% team.
     
  17. dsnow23

    dsnow23 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,458
    Likes Received:
    68
    I'm no scout, but Pena signing seems mind bogglingly stupid. Old, hitting 197 and striking out like crazy = 2.9 mil from Stros. Gross.
     
  18. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,466
    Likes Received:
    5,379
    As to your bolded statement: So, . . . what's the problem?

    If Pena hits all his incentives (and gets a total of $4.3 million next year), wouldn't that be about what you'd HOPE to get from Berkman? (I have no idea what the incentives are but assume they'd correspond with him being a very good DH.) And with Berkman, you'd likely have to pay him more and not get most of his contract value incentive-based.

    That said, I'm not exactly in love with this move. A whole lot of "meh" there.
     
  19. tellitlikeitis

    tellitlikeitis Canceled
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    20,659
    Likes Received:
    13,924
    It's only a 1-year deal, which is fine with me. He does serve some purpose as a bridge to Jonathan Singleton. Besides, is he really robbing playing time from some can't-miss prospects like Brett Wallace and J.D. Martinez?

    I don't expect the 2007 Carlos Pena, who hit 46 home runs. If he's got a line like, say.... .240/20/70 by the trade deadline, they could flip him for prospects.
     
  20. cardpire

    cardpire Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2008
    Messages:
    10,809
    Likes Received:
    769
    there's some built-in upside with potential to be flipped at deadline.

    not sure why anybody is freaking out over his contract. we have an infinitesimal payroll, and it's not like pena's salary is precluding us from spending money anywhere else, now or in the future. and it's not coming out of our (the fans') pockets.

    for those freaking out about berkman: this move spells out pretty clearly that he wasn't coming here. if they could have gotten him/he wanted to come here for anything close to the same price, he would be an astro.
     

Share This Page