1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

It's pretty evident we're a better team when Lin is the primary ball handler.

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Geronimo, Dec 2, 2012.

  1. gtmkcp

    gtmkcp Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Messages:
    500
    Likes Received:
    7

    I know it's annoying. Also please stop quoting B/R. They're a joke.
     
  2. roxxy

    roxxy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    5,120
    Likes Received:
    162
    This doesn't make much sense. People use the word potential all the time when talking about draft picks. Potential is a term that is universally used for all young players. Just a thought.
     
  3. kuku

    kuku Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2012
    Messages:
    2,158
    Likes Received:
    125
    Newsflash

    Oxford English Dictionary just added a new word to their entry.

    GARM-sanity: People at Clutchfans have the same arguments about Lin and expect different results.
     
  4. SuperStar

    SuperStar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    5,057
    Likes Received:
    70
    Potential is just a word that's easily toss around but doesn't mean anything.
     
  5. CarolNYC

    CarolNYC Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2012
    Messages:
    402
    Likes Received:
    100
    From Zach Lowe's "10 Things I Like and Don't Like" today:

    http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id...mess-nba-loudest-arena-jeremy-lin-doing-right
     
  6. flamingdts

    flamingdts Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2008
    Messages:
    11,630
    Likes Received:
    4,729
    I'm sure it means a lot, otherwise 4 year college players would dominate the lottery picks.
     
  7. roxxy

    roxxy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    5,120
    Likes Received:
    162
    It does mean something. There is a reason why fans love young teams. Because they are frustrating and exciting but mostly because of there potential. They provide the promise of the unknown good or bad. People love that because they don't know what to expect. Look at the buzz surrounding Damian Llilard & Eric Bledsoe. It's potential. Just a thought.
     
  8. SuperStar

    SuperStar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    5,057
    Likes Received:
    70
    It's just everyone uses that word to describe just about any professional athlete at one time or another and not many really reach it.
     
  9. roxxy

    roxxy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    5,120
    Likes Received:
    162
    Just because not many people reach there potential doesn't mean that the word should be removed altogether. For every player that doesn't reach there potential there is another player who far exceeds expectations. Potential is the entire point of the NBA draft lol. Your'e arguing against an institutional structure. Just a thought.
     
  10. lfw

    lfw Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    1,221
    Likes Received:
    33
    I actually have no issue with him thinking Lin has the potential to be Kidd. The issue I have is his method of using stats to try and illustrate his point. First of all, he is using an insignificant sample size of 16 games that Lin played this season. Secondly, he didn't even attempt to find other players who had similar stats like I did, he just compared Lin to Kidd. Third, he had to make numerous assumptions like scaling Lin's stats to match Kidd's USG% rate which is a pretty huge assumption. Sounds like he was trying to manipulate the data so Lin comparable to Kidd rather than find players who actually have comparable stats to Lin at the start of their careers.

    I think Lin has a lot of potential but his method is just flawed.
     
  11. SuperStar

    SuperStar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    5,057
    Likes Received:
    70
    I'm just saying it's meaningless especially when ppl start comparing a point guard who is having an average to below average season with less than half a season worth of games to stars/superstars.
     
  12. gtmkcp

    gtmkcp Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Messages:
    500
    Likes Received:
    7

    I really didn't pay much attention to his stats really, but I think he and the other poster saw things that Lin did in college, last year and this year that make them think he has similar traits as Kidd. Lin has started out slow this year and in my opinion there a lot of factors why, won't go into it here. He did almost get a triple double I think in one of the earlier games.
     
  13. roxxy

    roxxy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    5,120
    Likes Received:
    162
    This really isn't about Lin anymore to be frank. Let's provide other examples. So when teams talk about the potential of a draft pick who has yet to even play an actual NBA game that is OK? Look at Kendall Marshall. He was drafted to be the heir apparent to Nash. Kendall is in the D-league right now.

    I do agree with you that comparing any young player to a future HOFer is silly. I have said as much. But I think you are going about proving your argument the wrong way. Just a thought.
     
  14. SuperStar

    SuperStar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    5,057
    Likes Received:
    70
    It's okay because that's all they can do. They draft on potential from their college resume.
     
  15. lfw

    lfw Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    1,221
    Likes Received:
    33
    My response is to this post below:

     
  16. roxxy

    roxxy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    5,120
    Likes Received:
    162
    So what is the difference between what is done in the draft & what rocketsfan did? And notice I am talking strictly about Rocketsfan who actually talked of his personal experience watching both players & not the other poster who was using a highly flawed (adjusting for USG whatever that is) method to prove a point.. Rocketsfan talked about potential based on how Lin played in college vs Kidd in College. Both parties are doing the same thing. That is what I don't get. Just some things to think about.
     
    1 person likes this.
  17. SuperStar

    SuperStar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    5,057
    Likes Received:
    70
    The difference would be Lin is already in the NBA. If people still want to compare him to Kidd at least wait till after a full season. Not when he's playing like this and early into the season.
     
  18. SuperStar

    SuperStar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    5,057
    Likes Received:
    70
    Even saying Lin has the potential to be a Kidd in college would sound ridiculous. Kidd was drafted 2nd overall first round.
     
  19. roxxy

    roxxy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    5,120
    Likes Received:
    162
    Okay this conversation has become maddeningly circular lets just end it now. Thanks for the discussion though, sincerely, it was lively. :)
     
  20. Jetfuel

    Jetfuel Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    530
    Likes Received:
    50
    Man arguing with you is like debating the world's oldest broken record.

    Lin was undrafted.. they thought he wasn't good enough to play in the NBA. He's categorically proven everyone wrong about that. If you look at everything he had achieved up to that point, I don't think if he was black, OR white, there's any chance he goes undrafted, but it is what it is.

    It's like you can't see past the label that was stuck on him by a bunch of narrow minded old dudes.

    Now you say look at him this season... ignoring all the other issues like coaching, chemistry, system etc.

    Look at all the Lakers superstars sucking it up... nothing to do with chemistry or system right? They must be bad players.

    Lebron and Wade... everyone was calling them a flop at the heat too in their first season together.

    This idea that coaching or management has nothing to do with how a player performs has to be the dumbest thing I've read or heard any sports fan say. Go watch any sport. The same players can perform drastically different under different coaches and strategies. It's like you go out of the way to pretend that there are no mitigating factors where Lin is concerned.

    I don't mind saying people shouldn't overhype Lin, that's fair enough, what I do mind is the ridiculous double standards that people apply to him and the mental gymnastics they go through to downplay his game or his potential (yes, I used that dirty word). And all I see is more of the same attitude and bias that resulted in him going undrafted in the first place.

    The reason Lin has so many fans is not because he's asian. It's because narrow-minded and shortsighted people judged him without giving him a chance and that story is what a lot of people fell in love with. And I'm sorry to say, that's what you've done with him as well.

    It's ironic, because when trolls, LOH's etc bash him all it does is make people who became his fans support him all the more ardently, especially when people have been unfair in their judgement of him as you have been.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now