Maybe you should stop talking for others. Especially if you don't know what he was talking about either. Mr. Obama skirted his fair share of questions also. What is Obama's plan for the next four years?
Just voted in Sacramento county. I filled out a scantron that was then read by a scanner. This seems like a very good voting system to me. Simple process, electronic tabulation, but with paper record of votes.
When you have rabid reporters trying to make a name for themselves, why not do as Jesus did and avoid the people who are obviously trying to harm you. Want to talk about dancing, try the number Obama has pulled when he has been asked about Benghazi. Now that's a routine that could win him Dancing with the Stars.
OK, if his response was in regards to something else, my comment still stands. Why support someone afraid to take questions from our free press, whose freedom is written in our constitution, for nearly a month? What does that tell you about Mitt Romney? (and I know others must have mentioned this, but your moniker has to have Bob Marley spinning in his grave by this point, bless him)
I believe it was bobmarley who supported Romney not speaking to the press because, paraphrasing, why would he when he is now in the lead.
Me too. It's an important election for the state, what with things like 30. (And for me, the totally anti-science 37 is an important one as well.) In San Francisco, the hippies want to dynamite the Hetch Hetchy again, so hopefully we vote that nonsense down. (Okay, vote down commissioning the 8th study of what would happen if they removed that damn, the source of our clean power and the best drinking water in the continental US. Duh.)
OK. You said "network" instead of all press and "favorable" instead "now in the lead". I stand by my paraphrasing.
