Great question, via the NYorker, of all places: President Obama, you run a very regular and deadly program of secretive targeted assassination by drone aircraft, and yet you have forbidden the use of coercive practices such as waterboarding in interrogation. So why is assassination O.K., but using force in an interrogation is out of bounds? Read more http://www.newyorker.com/online/blo...-the-foreign-policy-debate.html#ixzz2A4fMOrY1
also, if al queda is "decimated", how did they manage the attack that killed chris stevens, in an area where they had not previously been particularly active?
It has to suck when the actual facts are allowed to come out and they don't fit in with the narrative basso has created for himself.
If you check the post below yours, you'd see more facts that go against your increasingly discredited narrative.
you're just posting links to the same story, talking points put out by the admin, but to different reporters.
So if I can't believe the people on the ground, can I believe the commentators who make money vilifying their political opponents?
watch, then check back with me in an hour: <iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/MIAE6vLct-0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
A U.S. ambassador is missing and his diplomatic team is desperately fighting off terrorist attacks. Our commander-in-chief and his national-security team in Washington are listening to the phone calls from the Americans under attack and watching real-time video from a drone circling overhead. Yet the U.S. military sends no aid. Why? good question. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/331125/first-aid-living-bing-west
