1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Romney: OK for employers to influence employees' votes

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by dandorotik, Oct 17, 2012.

  1. Northside Storm

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    11,262
    Likes Received:
    450
    Or better yet, be part of a protected category, find cause for discrimination/implicit threats in the email in question, and bring that s**t all the way up to the Federal appeals system, if not the Supreme Court.
     
  2. Air Langhi

    Air Langhi Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2000
    Messages:
    21,941
    Likes Received:
    6,695
    What if a union told all its member to vote for someone would you feel the same way?
     
  3. CometsWin

    CometsWin Breaker Breaker One Nine

    Joined:
    May 15, 2000
    Messages:
    28,028
    Likes Received:
    13,051
    What's really comical is you comparing showing up to late to work which is typically something that you can get disciplined for with exercising your Constitutional right to vote. Nice.
     
  4. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,607
    Likes Received:
    7,137
    Don't cross the union.
     
  5. REEKO_HTOWN

    REEKO_HTOWN I'm Rich Biiiiaaatch!

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    47,504
    Likes Received:
    19,629
    You do know that members of a union can FIRE/demote the Union head right? If the Union members don't want the head to indorse a politician they tell the leader whom they elected.
     
  6. Commodore

    Commodore Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    33,567
    Likes Received:
    17,546
    yes, bring on any and all political speech (all speech really), the more the better, can never have enough in a free society
     
  7. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,055
    Likes Received:
    15,229
    BS. Freedom of speech does not allow you to bribe or threaten people to get them to vote for your candidate. That is not protected speech; no more than if the local Black Panthers told you if Romney became President your house might burn down.
     
  8. gifford1967

    gifford1967 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    8,306
    Likes Received:
    4,653
    What's the problem. You can just move to a different house. FREEDOM1!!!11!!
     
  9. percicles

    percicles Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    11,987
    Likes Received:
    4,438
  10. dandorotik

    dandorotik Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    10,855
    Likes Received:
    3,752
    Go up to a police officer and say, "F**k you, b**ch." Then tell me how that 1st Amendment is working for you.

    Or, better yet, agree with the practice in which employers can hold employees' jobs over the head and influence them to vote a particular way by saying, "well, it's not against the law."

    Even better still, maybe we can have Clutch come on here and say, "You know, if ______ is elected, with all the extra costs for running the site, we will probably have to shut ClutchFans down." You don't think some of us would vote the way he wanted, considering for many of us, there's nothing more important than the Rockets and this site??? He'd persuade me, that's for sure.
     
  11. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,167
    Likes Received:
    48,334
    Cool Story Bro.

    I worked as a temp for Bain Capital for a little while in 1994 when Romney was running against Ted Kennedy and while I was never told to vote for Romney there were Romney for Senate bumper stickers and signs all over the place.
     
  12. stephenoa

    stephenoa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    4
    I don't normally comment anywhere on politics internet or not, and if i make an effort to conceal my allegiance to any particular party or candidate.

    But I'm breaking my rule, something I dont take lightly. Two Reasons. I feel like everyone here is a big rocket fan so i can assure myself that anyone who will read this has at least something in common with me. Also, I have kept this contained and this particular issue is grating on me so I've just gotta let it out.

    This story isnt about me, its about my dad. I think it might be more effective if told from his first person perspective, but he's definetly not the type to complain and you would be upset with me if he knew I shared any of this. In fact I dont even know if hes aware that even I know much of these details. But I feel Its not irresponsible for me to pass any of this on, I spend everyday with my dad, he is my best friend, we not only work together but share common hobbies like watching rockets games.

    My Dad is a 56 year old, white, high school dropout. He's been married for 20 years and has 3 children. If you met him you would probably assume he was educated certainly not Ivy league, but no one would mistake him for stupid. You probably also would not consider him an extravagantly wealthy man, he drives a 2004 ford excursion, a very nice car but not extravagant. He is a homeowner, who lives in a 4 bedroom 4 bathroom house in Seabrook built in 1978 with a remodeled kitchen and master bath. Iphone 4, 50 inch hd tv, gets rockets tickets, can take whole family to pappasitos etc etc, basically he appears to be your typical boring "rich white suburban dad"

    He would call himself a "small business owner". I will not place that label on him, because there is no consensus on what that really means. President Obama is a major supporter of small business, quick to let us know that small businesses account for 50% of private sector jobs and refers to them as the backbone of our economy. But he also makes it clear that even "Donald Trump is a 'small business'", and that guys like Donald Trump dont need tax cuts, they can actually afford to help out "the rest of the folks". "a bunch of millionaires and billionaires" is I believe how he put it in the first debate. He has and will continue to issue tax cuts that help 97 PERCENT of small businesses that make less than $250,000 a year, NEARLY ALL OF THEM. My dad's business makes more than that, I want to tell you about about one of the millionaires and billionaires in the other 3%.

    My dad owns a company that makes fire-r****dant clothing. If you work in a plant around Houston there is a semi-decent chance you wear a coverall made by his company. He has owned this business for almost 20 years now. Before that he was a sales representative for a variety of manufacturers in the safety industry. One of the companies he represented was a small FR clothing manufacturer we'll call them Gator Suits, he thought they did good work at a fair price and it was a fairly easy sell for him. He noticed once his commission was late, called the owner of Gator Suits to ask for his check. He was informed that they would be closing, the owner had other more lucrative businesses and Gator Suits had become a waste of his time and money. My dad was obviously concerned, 40 women worked at a sewing factory in Lousianna for Gator and they would all lose their jobs, I'm sure he was more worried about losing his commission though. At the end of the day my dad really only cares about himself and his family. At 36 years old he took his life savings (which of course wasn't much for a former highschool dropout with 2 young kids) and a home equity loan and told Gators employees to stay at the factory, to keep working. He had enough money left to cover payroll and fabric for maybe a few months but he believed in the company and himself. He changed the company name to, lets say.. Trump Workwear and embraced the risk head on.

    2 decades later and Trump workwear is somewhat of a success story, growing substantially. That first factory has been closed, but 3 have opened in its place. Trump workwear employs 185 people in Lousianna and Texas. All but 7 of which are female. Many are mininum wage and the average salary is not much more than 25k. Taxable Income in 2011 was 5k within $400,000 and the tax bill ended up after deductions exemptions and such being 5k withing $100,000 for an effective tax rate of around 25%. $300,000 is alot of money to take home in a year theres no doubt about that. Its a low margin business, theres alot of moving pieces and very long days, but ultimately I think he would tell you it has been well worth his time.

    Obama is just going to let bush tax cuts expire, which to non tax payers or small tax payers like myself looks pretty much like just bumping up 5% on the wealthy. Its my understanding that certain deductions and exemptions are affected as well, but i have no clue what they are, either way it doesnt matter much if his effective tax rate is 30 or 40%. The mortgage wont change, personal expenses wont change, its not like he has a whole lot of personal excess he can really cut back on. He will just have less money to re-invest in the business, maybe take a few less customers and employees out to lunch or to games, maybe take a less aggressive stance on investing in potentially innovative sewing technologies, maybe run the AC a few degrees warmer. He will spend less, have less expenses to write off. If sales somehow remain steady even after cutbacks he will actually show a higher taxable income, but I can guarantee he wont feel any "richer". Im unsure how it all works, he claims higher taxes will make business harder, I dont really know if i believe that it does sound a little greedy to me. If it goes all to way up to 40%(doubtful IMO but for points sake bare with me) he will have to make 500k to keep 300k and will pay 200k. I dont know if cutting expenses down 100k is really feasible but I think he could come close without totally wrecking the company or laying off too many people any more cutting and Im sure the landscape of the company would have to change dramatically. Thats 100k more in tax revenue for the rest of us. I will say I can truthfully see how in theory this would help us balance the federal budget.

    But then there was Obamacare. If a person is within 400% of the poverty level(most of Trump Workwears employees) they will be eligible for subsidized healthcare. Every single person hear loves the security of healthcare and every single person loves free stuff, if you deny that your lyin. But as we know nothings actually free, somebody does pay for it. How much will Obamacare cost Trump Workwear. Obamacare penalties only apply to companies with over 50 employees and the penalties themselves are waived for the first 30 employees. Employers are fined $2,000 per employee but the increases to $3,000 for any employee who purchases subsidized healthcare from a federal exchange. 185-30 x 3000= $465,000 in penalties.

    $465,000

    This is more money than he keeps, more money than he makes, and almost as much money as he would make if he cut all of his business expenses, $100k, to the bare bones. This is real, this will happen on January 1 2014. My Dad will have two choices.

    Trump Workwear forges ahead, maybe the cut investments and increased morale of a fully insured workforce will offset eachother causing sales to remain steady. If they do he will be able to claim $35,000, which will only be taxed at a 15% rate allowing him to keep $29,750. Its not alot to feed a family of 5 but he could definetly make it work. Hopefully he would be able to sell the house quickly. He would certainly have to adjust to the idea that he was only contributing $5000 towards the federal tax revenue 95,000 less than he would have under the bush tax cuts. A troubling thought for someone who has watched the national debt spiral out of control. Of course he'd get free healthcare though. Well actually that would be another 3000, plus the 1000 max out of pocket cost for familes at 150% of the poverty level, which would bring his take home pay to $25,750.

    or

    Move 100% of manufacturing overseas. layoff nearly 175 americans. Probably make a little bit more money than before, and feel like he had sold his soul. Fail at his dream to make a quality affordable product right here in the USA. Unfortunately I would guess this is the option he would chose. 175x 22k a year is $3,850,000. Maybe those women would find other jobs maybe they wouldnt, who really wants to work that hard for so little money anyways. At 15% tax rate those women contribute $577,500 is federal taxes. My dad would contribute his 200 instead of 100 from bush cuts but the overall effect would be a $477,500 tax revenue decrease. Basically this is a choice between himself and his family or his country. What would you do? There is a 3rd choice.

    LET IT BE SOMEONE ELSES PROBLEM--the new american motto
    QUIT! Sell his company to a big corporation who will be faced with the same choice. Let them chose let them deal with the guilt. I wonder how that will pan out?

    Lost in all of this is how hard my dad has worked to build this company, the times he's been sued unfairly, the emails that never end, the conventions he attended instead of my little league baseball games and birthdays. Lost in all of this is how caring and generous my dad has been, never asking for credit or recognition, "if we dont look out for each other than who else will". I fear my America is turning into Europe where people think, "I dont have to look out for others because thats what I pay the goverment to do". My dad is not greedy, I can tell you that first hand, no one who knows him would ever call him that. In this campaign however, him and hundreds of thousands like him have been demonized by the democrats as the face of greed. They tell you 50% of jobs come from small business, they dont tell you 50% of THOSE jobs come from only 3% of small businesses, a quarter of the private sector jobs. Obamas small businesses are 1 man graphic design companies etc etc, really really small businesses. Beacons of the American dream, commendable and entirely worthwhile ventures, but not true job creators, not the "backbone" of our economy.

    Do you believe the 3% is made up of more Donald Trumps (who employs many more in his corporate ventures than his smaller companies like Trump Tower Sales & Leasing which has 20 executive level employees as opposed to the Trump Organization that employs 22,000 and meets no ones definition of a small business) or are there more are there more nameless fameless d-head Joe Bosses like my dad spead across the country. I dont know what other industries this is going to kill, but I can say definitively no domestic garment manufacturing company has a business model that can survive obamacare.

    Obama will not help small businesses he will only help big businesses and the elite. January 1 2014 will be the biggest day of lay-offs in the nations history. More people will be forced onto the goverment dole, effectively guaranteeing more democrat voters. Taxes will continue to rise so our unemployed dont starve, and eventually the money will run out. If you make 30,000 or less the worst thing you could do is vote for Obama, you will get health care now but your odds of ever finding a higher paying job or a job at all will begin to rapidly decrease.

    Soooo... My Dad is still under the impression it is illegal for him to even talk about the election with his employees and doing so could get him sued. So he wont. But if i were him I would, because if his employees vote Obama they will effectively be firing themselves.
     
    1 person likes this.
  13. stephenoa

    stephenoa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    4
    the point is i believe employees deserve to know how the outcome of the election will effect the companies future plans if at all. It shouldn't be seen as voter intimidation it should be seen as corporate honesty.
     
  14. Raven

    Raven Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,984
    Likes Received:
    1,025
    It's voter intimidation. Spin it all you want.
     
  15. David Stern

    David Stern Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,021
    Likes Received:
    33

    I have a feeling this story will end up being scrutinized by folks with better knowledge of the ins and outs of the Health care reform act and it won’t hold up.
     
  16. REEKO_HTOWN

    REEKO_HTOWN I'm Rich Biiiiaaatch!

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    47,504
    Likes Received:
    19,629
    I'm sure the health of 400 said employees means a lot to you dad. A man of dignity would respect that.
     
  17. CometsWin

    CometsWin Breaker Breaker One Nine

    Joined:
    May 15, 2000
    Messages:
    28,028
    Likes Received:
    13,051
    In your scenario, the business owner made a choice not to offer health care to his employees for 20 years. Who was paying for the health care of his minimum wage employees for the last 20 years?
     
  18. REEKO_HTOWN

    REEKO_HTOWN I'm Rich Biiiiaaatch!

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    47,504
    Likes Received:
    19,629
    Me and you. I'd also like to ask if those said employees are mostly undocumented workers. I would guess, yes.
     
  19. dandorotik

    dandorotik Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    10,855
    Likes Received:
    3,752
    Stephenoa:

    Thank you for the detailed story- great job! I almost feel bad pointing out some errors, but they're absolutely necessary:

    1. The Democrats are not "demonizing" the rich. When Obama says the tax rates should go up from 36% to 39.5%, that is not demonizing the rich. That is not a huge jump. I own a small business. I know.

    2. Many of your points are well-taken; however, when you start using phrases like "government dole," "job creators," it's obvious you've already been sold the Republican party talking points. A bit suspect.

    3. So, you're saying that your dad would pay $465,000 in penalties for a business that makes him close to $500,000? Something doesn't add up- if that were the case, why aren't we hearing revolting in the streets? Again, not saying you're necessarily wrong, but that just makes no sense. I'll do some research on this and get back to you.
     
  20. dandorotik

    dandorotik Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    10,855
    Likes Received:
    3,752
    There are a few ideas in here to consider:

    Long before the Supreme Court ruling that upheld the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act, the political battle lines appeared pretty clear. With lobbies like the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) acting as plaintiffs in the case, it was easy to assume the business community was solidly aligned in the “against” category on Obamacare, too.

    But business reaction has been more mixed, even at the small business level. After all, the legislation addresses much more than the question of whether individuals should be forced to have health insurance. The June 28 decision also upheld a 2.3 percent tax on the revenue of medical device companies. And it offers intellectual property protection that was considered critical by many in the biotechnology sector. So while some see the specter of higher costs, others salivate at the prospect of a wider insured pool that spurs demand for everything from broader hospital services to more mobile health apps.

    Some small businesses even love the so-called individual mandate—the one the NFIB warned in a statement after the ruling will lead to “an onslaught of taxes and mandates, resulting in job loss and closed businesses.” The reason: It frees them from the shackles of having to compete in a world that revolves around employer-based coverage. (Does innovation really thrive in an environment where job applicants aspire to be coffee baristas mainly so they can get health-care coverage?)

    Now that the high court has spoken, businesses of all sizes are grappling with how to adjust. Even opponents of the legislation can’t cross their fingers and hope that a President Romney will repeal the whole thing. With 18 months before the provisions go into effect, and much less time before companies must design new plans and offer them to their employees, they have to now treat the law as a business reality.

    The changes are large. In January 2014, employers will have to either pony up a plan that meets the requirements of Washington or opt out and pay a penalty in terms of both costs and employee morale. In large corporations, there’s probably not that much to be done. Most may already offer a broad menu of benefits through their existing health plans. They’ve already been pushing more costs onto their employees and cajoling higher-risk ones into wellness programs to keep those costs down. If anything, the fierce debate around health care has offered large companies cover to make these shifts by drawing attention to soaring health costs and the burden employers bear.

    What such companies now need to assess is how many of those employees may be covered under their plans, thanks to automatic enrollment provisions for businesses with more than 200 employees. In everything from e-mail marketing to pension plans, adopting an “opt in” or “opt out” strategy can make a critical difference. Inertia is a powerful force, especially for busy employees who don’t always take action. Defaulting to automatic coverage means a higher percentage of those workers could end up on their companies’ plans.

    Another potential hurdle is the non-discrimination requirements of the act. Employers can no longer slice and dice their offerings to design gold-plated plans with lucrative benefits for the most-valued employees at the top of the wage pyramid, while tossing some scraps of basic coverage to the proletariat. As a result, warns Sheldon J. Blumling, an attorney in the employment benefits practice of Fisher & Phillips, “they’ll either have to bring up the lower-subsidized segments to the highest common denominator or bring everyone down to the lowest common denominator.” With talent scarce in some categories and plentiful in others, that’s not an easy decision.

    Still, the really tough choices lie with smaller employers. Those with health programs may have designed them in such a way to offer basic, lower-cost coverage. Faced with the prospect of higher costs to comply with the law, they may choose to stop offering coverage altogether if they decide the penalties are cheaper than the administrative costs of running a broader plan. Even that assessment isn’t an easy one, says Blumling. You could just send everyone—including yourself—out into the open market to buy coverage on a health insurance exchange. “Nobody really knows yet what kind of coverage you’ll get there for your money.”

    Workers could end up paying more than if premiums are negotiated as part of group coverage. Or they could end up paying less as insurers compete for business. Employees could be happy to get a bigger paycheck or resentful at being forced to foot the bill for their own coverage. Many more people may even feel comfortable working on a contract or freelance basis because they no longer feel the lingering insecurity of being uncovered in the event of an illness or accident.

    So, even with the act essentially upheld, plenty of uncertainty remains. Critics fret that consumers may spend less on other goods and services in reaction to new costs, but others argue they’ll spend more as their out-of-pocket medical costs fall. Job growth may be curbed by new costs, or helped as a higher proportion of the population flows into a modernized and more efficient health-care system. What is clear: Obamacare is a reality that every business leader has to confront now.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now