i wouldn't mind a shorter time limit in these 'no cap' drafts. maybe 2 hours instead of 3? you can always give someone your list. it's harder to make that list when you have to check salaries, but with no salaries... it's easy.
jmc can you please explain your vote a bit more in my matchup thread? Wrote a response and would appreciate more than one sentence from you(plus I think the spacing issue you mentioned is non existent on my team). Thanks.
123R, when you are online, we need a decision on how the voting works... what counts, what doesn't count. i suggested this before the draft began: basically, two judges count as 1 vote each, and the rest (people who built teams) as the 3rd vote in case judges are split. I don't know if it's the best solution or not. Maybe just count every vote and ignore the whole "judges" tradition. Or maybe we need to find a couple more outside judges and ignore our votes. Whatever the case, we need to decide, because right now it seems messy.
(and if we end up ignoring the judges thing and just counting every vote... what's the target number? we have 12 people + 2 judges = 14, so i guess first to 7?)
Hmm, for this draft, we'll leave it. For the nest draft, I will find 3 judges to vote for all the matchups. IzakDavid13 will certainly be a judge.Maybe VBG too. And, I will also see if I can get jopatmc if he can be a judge again. Thanks for the input
Yeah, except I never said that but you for some reason cannot read any opinions that disagree with yours. There's no point in arguing with you since you refuse to even properly read what the other person is saying. I never ever said that Dwight + Yao are better. But for some reason that just goes over your head.
He never said that, he said something like, they can compete with them because they play their roles better.
