I am not anti-environment at all... Way to assume... I am for limited government, not your version, nor the Republican version.. limited means limited, whether it is limits on abortions, guns or civil rights.. Gun ownership helps keep the government on edge.. Something the super elite .001% should serious be concerned about.. Now go back to listening to Cold Play and crying to your fat girlfriend about your feelings.
They (people with limited intellect) like to put everyone in a small group. I am massively pro environment. It helps them to dismiss the beating from a "crazy" person easier lulz To be fair, the liberal argument is not well represented by CometsWin.
what the heck lol, you are trying too hard man. cars killing people not the same as guns killing people. we live in a day and age where cars are neccessary, esp in the usa lol. to say that we should apply the same logic of gun limit to car limit is some crazy stuff lol. need to calm down and think bro
2007 Drink Driving deaths = 12,998 2007 Gun Homicides = 12,632 You are right about one thing, cars killing people is not the same. Far more kids die in car related accidents. I think you are the one that needs to calm down and think, your trying to hard.
Nice logical leap. We have had restrictions on the right to bear arms for hundreds of years. Your scary consequence has not materialized. You lose.
Also I think a firearm in today's America is just as important as picking up food from the store to eat. Crime rates are going up and up by the years due to our nation becoming more populated by illegals(from all over the world) and the rising rates of violate gangs being formed. Pretty every where in America now is where Miami was in the 80's-90's with drug violence and gangs. IMO, guns are neccesary to have by law abiding citizens that live in large cities where they are more prone to violence in all sorts of ways.
You're either an idiot, or ignorant or trolling. not sure if I care, but suffice it to say you're wrong.
dang bro so you are suggesting we also limit cars in addition to guns because of this fact? i dont even know who taught you to think that way brah
Just because it hasn't " materialized " yet, doesn't make you right either sir. Nor has gun control been in the spotlight as it has been in the past few weeks. You start stacking on laws for laws for laws and eventually you end up with ZERO gun ownership.
You can grow weed in your back yard, or inside a house with a minor cost to set up. You wont have enough to sell, and it wont be the 'dankest' stuff you've ever smoked, but it's not hard to grow. For $200, and about $20/harvest for nutrients and whatnot, you can set up a minor hydroponics system that will yield you a few ounces of good stuff every few months. As long as you have a spare closet, it's not hard to do. I can't speak for meth. Guns, on the other hand, need a major manufacturing arm, not to mention the materials to make and distribute will be major red flags.
Not saying that at all, but you are completely ignoring the fact that vehicles are just of a deadly weapon as a firearm is. that's why when you try to run over a cop, they shoot your ass.
No, it makes me exactly right. We've had some form of restrictions on arms for hundreds of years. The total proscription of which you speak is not even remotely a possibility. I appreciate you calling me sir. The honorific is appropriate in this instance.
How is it not a possibility? amendments can be amended until they are completely useless. Far more people in Texas want casinos over the people who don't want them... guess what, still no casinos in Texas. The same can be applied if people really start beating gun control issues to death.
It's not a possibiliy because it hasn't happened and has no reasonable chance of happening and no reasonable observer would conclude otherwise.
Because more people died one way, you don't want to try and save people that a dying from a different cause. And lets also crack down harder on drunk driving.
I pointed this out before but I will repeat it. We highly regulate automobile usage, design, construction and type. So yes it is acknowledged that cars are dangerous which is why we regulate them. Apparently those bringing up this tired argument about cars being more dangerous than guns as an argument against gun regulation seem to conveniently forget that point.
no, i havent ignored that fact at all. cars do kill. but you cant ban or limit cars because thats how people travel. without cars in most cities in america, you are truly limited. cars are almost a necessity in so many cases; driving to work, going to get groceries, going to church, going to see a friend, picking up your child in an emergency, going to the hospital. guns? they dont quite have the same necessity but they still cause alot of problems and deaths.
I'm not a law enforcement officer, but in my line of work. It's a necessity to carry a pistol. You can ride along with me one day if you would like and see for your self.
yeah it applies to you but not necesarily to the majority of people. students and most office workers do not bring gun to work lol
