1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

NYTimes: it is necessary to raise taxes on the middle class

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by basso, Aug 7, 2012.

  1. basso

    basso Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    33,363
    Likes Received:
    9,290
    They buried the lede, but the mask drops at the end...

    --
    Business Fears the Fiscal Cliff
    Published: August 6, 2012

    So it turns out that federal spending is important to the economy after all.

    As Nelson Schwartz reported in The Times on Monday, a number of manufacturers say they are canceling plans for investing and hiring, in part, because they fear that some $100 billion in budget cuts will take effect in 2013. In all, the law currently calls for $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts over 10 years, starting Jan. 1, divided between nondefense programs and defense projects.

    Republican lawmakers demanded the cuts last year as part of their brinkmanship over the debt ceiling, and business lobbies have generally supported slashing the deficit. But now that the cuts are imminent, corporate executives seem to have realized that the last thing the economy needs is a large budget cut across the board.

    They’re right about that. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the combined impact of the automatic spending cuts plus the scheduled expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts — the so-called fiscal cliff — would cause the economy to contract in the first half of 2013. Some business leaders seem to think the solution is for Congress to act as soon as possible to avert the spending cuts and to extend all of the tax cuts. That would avoid an economic downturn next year, but it would also mean no progress toward long-term deficit reduction.

    The best approach is to delay the blow of lower federal spending, thus shielding businesses from a sudden drop in support, and, at the same time, temporarily extend the Bush-era tax cuts for most Americans and let them expire for those making more than $250,000 a year, as President Obama has proposed. That would raise revenue and be a credible step toward long-term deficit reduction, without harming the recovery, because high-end tax increases do not cut deeply into consumer spending.

    Politically, such a deal can probably be struck only in 2013, after the spending cuts have kicked in and the tax cuts have expired, assuming Mr. Obama wins re-election. Republican lawmakers, confronting the consequences of the spending cuts, would have to come to the conclusion that delaying both defense and nondefense spending cuts would be best for today’s economy. As for the tax cuts, letting them all expire could pressure Republicans to renew them for the middle class, while letting them end for the rich.

    That is crucial because higher taxes for top earners is necessary for the nation to begin to raise the revenue it needs. And until the rich pay more, there will never be a national consensus for tax increases on middle-income Americans, which will eventually be needed to further curb long-term deficits.

    Even business leaders are starting to complain. Now it is up to Democrats to force Republicans to rework the coming spending cuts and tax increases in a way that benefits most Americans and the broader economy.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/07/opinion/business-fears-the-fiscal-cliff.html?_r=1
     
  2. Classic

    Classic Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    6,101
    Likes Received:
    608
    He had the opportunity to do this in 2010 but he caved. 250k does not need to be the ceiling either. Create another category for 1mil earners. Those are mainly people in finance anyway.
     
  3. thadeus

    thadeus Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,313
    Likes Received:
    726
    basso-style reading comprehension.

    "Until the rich pay more..."

    So, basso posted this article to support Romney's plan to raise taxes on the middle class, but conveniently omits the fact that Romney's plan cuts taxes on the wealthy.

    Great thread.
     
  4. BigBenito

    BigBenito Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    7,355
    Likes Received:
    175
    a basso article that i actually agree with. /bewildered.

    (however, basso's analysis is certainly on par with expectations)
     
  5. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    Exactly. I'll glady pay more taxes, but if someone wants to decrease the taxes on the wealthy while raising them on the rest of us, they better play that abortion and gay marriage wedge while they can before the guns come out. It's like they want a revolution.
     
  6. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,606
    Likes Received:
    7,136
    Raise taxes, by decreasing refundable credits and most tax breaks.
     
  7. ScolaIsBallin

    ScolaIsBallin Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,158
    Likes Received:
    559
    If you look at the taxes though, the wealthy already pay 50% of their income in taxes. Now I'm not even near that, but why penalize people that worked hard for their money (most of them). That means the middle class isn't paying their "fair share", as Obama would say. This is why Herman Cain's plan was good in theory, although there was still obvious flaws. The tax system needs serious reform to be fair.
     
  8. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,826
    Likes Received:
    41,300
    No they don't, not even close. Not sure where you are getting your information but it is profoundly wrong.
     
  9. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,606
    Likes Received:
    7,136
    Depends on the individual. Between all the types of taxes, there are many that do come close. Not everyone is Warren Buffet.
     
  10. geeimsobored

    geeimsobored Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    8,968
    Likes Received:
    3,389
    Seriously name some examples. I'm tired of anecdotes when it comes to issues like taxes.

    Income taxes are at historical lows. I dont know how people get off crying about paying too much in taxes.
     
  11. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,826
    Likes Received:
    41,300
    That's not even remotely true. The top marginal rate is 35%, and remember, that's a MARGINAL rate so that the effective tax rate is necessarily lower.


    [​IMG]


    There's basically almost no conceivable way you could have to pay over 50% of your income in taxes unless you face some extremely bizarre sets of circumstances.
     
  12. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,606
    Likes Received:
    7,136
    You want me to name names of ordinary people you don't know at all and violate client confidentiality?
     
  13. geeimsobored

    geeimsobored Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    8,968
    Likes Received:
    3,389
    I'm all for raising taxes on the rich until they actually prove they're being over-taxed.

    I'm tired of cowing to a bunch of crybabies who have done little to actually demonstrate their supposed unfair tax-burden.

    We're destroying programs that help the poor and balancing a budget on the backs of the poor and elderly because some rich people are crying about their taxes so until they prove it, I dont believe a word they say.

    We are engaging in a politics of selfishness and that isn't sustainable and it needs to end at some point.
     
  14. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,606
    Likes Received:
    7,136
    35% Federal income taxes
    6.2% SS (Maxed at $110k, 4.2% for this year)
    1.45% Medicare
    7.65% Self-Employed side (1.45% after $110k)
    9% state rate (highest is 11% in Oregon, but no sales tax)
    1% local income taxes
    7% Sales tax (just using my local rate)
    Property taxes
    Fuel taxes
    Sin taxes

    It isn't an extremely bizzare sets of circumstances.

    A couple who made $593k in 2010 paid:
    $143k fed income tax
    $48k state income tax
    $10k FICA
    $20k Self-employment tax (Sole proprietor)
    $10k in employer's share of FICA (as S-Corp owner)
    $20k in property taxes

    Total of $251K = 42%

    That doesn't include sales taxes, fuel taxes, or sin taxes. It is also in a state with a lower marginal rate and no local sales tax. They also had a substantial number of deductions for mortgage interest and charity.
     
  15. ScolaIsBallin

    ScolaIsBallin Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,158
    Likes Received:
    559
    That is INCOME tax. Factor in all the other taxes and it's a lot more. Add in someone who started their own business, that's more taxes. I have a relative who worked hard to get out of the ghetto and is now a millionaire by starting his own business. He is not a millionaire by much, but he still is. Even he has to pay much of his wealth in taxes. He's not Warren Buffett. Does it make sense to penalize someone who has achieved high grades in high school, college, and then it paid off by getting a good job?
     
  16. ScolaIsBallin

    ScolaIsBallin Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,158
    Likes Received:
    559
    I'm a high school student right now and I have a high GPA, plan on getting into a good college, and hope to get a great job. Someday I hope this work pays off and I don't want to be taxed heavily because of it. It seems like many of the people that are saying "Raise the taxes on the wealthy! I want my fair share!" never made it because they didn't work hard enough. Just look at the people that were protesting at Wall Street.
     
  17. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,183
    Likes Received:
    20,334
    That's about what I pay and I make a fraction of that. I think a 35% marginal tax rate is pretty reasonable considering it use to be 90% not too long ago.
     
  18. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,183
    Likes Received:
    20,334
    You think only the wealthy are the ones who have worked hard????
     
  19. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,606
    Likes Received:
    7,136
    My income tax return for 2011:

    $42,542 income
    ($2,680) Fed income tax
    $1,400 property taxes
    $1,145 state income tax
    $2,678 FICA (W/B $3,626 in a normal year).
     
  20. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,606
    Likes Received:
    7,136
    The income tax rates aren't the problem. It's the special tax rates and the various deductions, credits, and loopholes.

    Edit: I'll add that tax laws screw over small business owners more often than anyone.
     

Share This Page