1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Iran plans to execute two for consuming alcohol

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by JD88, Jun 28, 2012.

  1. HayesStreet

    HayesStreet Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1999
    Messages:
    8,507
    Likes Received:
    181
    That a law is the product of a culture doesn't mean it should be protected or defended. There are many things that particular cultures (including here in the US) have valued in their time that are not ok (see human sacrifice, rape, slavery, child prostitution...), and using religion/culture as an argument to preserve the practices is not ok.
     
  2. thadeus

    thadeus Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,313
    Likes Received:
    726
    I'm sure the Imams are tipping back the bottle every night while all the people who want to be "real muslims" are deathly afraid of touching alcohol.

    There's no justification for this. It's a ridiculously medieval law.
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    100,957
    Likes Received:
    103,357
    The syrah grape is from France, Rhône specifically.
     
  4. Grandpappy

    Grandpappy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2007
    Messages:
    676
    Likes Received:
    17
    This is why religion should have no place in government. People that want to follow the teachings of their given religion are free to do so. At no point should every citizen be forced to follow the teachings of any religion.
    Unfortunately the people in the government in Iran have religion shoved so far up their collective asses that they have to pray before they take a dump.
     
  5. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    65,255
    Likes Received:
    32,965
    Probably.
    Seems we maybe too lax
    and
    they are too extreme in the other direction



    As A_3PO points out . . more severe punishment for its abuse is the issue
    Maybe not Death Penalty but the slaps on the wrist now aren't working.

    When I evaluate these areas and our own
    we have to understand we maybe as extreme in the opposite direct
    as they are in their direction.
    We think their laws and punishments are 'Draconian'
    they think ours are non existant

    our Prisons are better than most people's homes around the world

    While 'draconian' they are somewhat effective
    To some . .that is all that matters

    Rocket River
     
  6. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,281
    You are crazy.
     
  7. jayhow92

    jayhow92 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    8,817
    Likes Received:
    6,123
    [​IMG]
     
  8. dmc89

    dmc89 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    3,816
    Likes Received:
    255
    I disagree with this. I think the Quran still works for today's age. Also, I cannot find anything in the Quran that says having a sip of alcohol will make you technically not Muslim as one poster said on here.

    I believe everything in moderation is the key. Using common sense (qiyas, aqal) is a huge component of Islamic jurisprudence. Drinking beer with your friends at home isn't always a problem. It becomes bad when you drink and drive, when you get so drunk you become belligerent, or lose consciousness, etc.

    These are the verses (Yuksel's translation) I found in the Quran regarding alcohol. As I interpret them, I see nothing wrong with what you do. Muhammad can't condemn (or judge) anyone so that they go to hell. Only one entity can do that. Here are the verses:

    2:219

    They ask you about intoxicants and
    gambling. Say, "In them is great harm,
    and a benefit for people; but their harm
    is greater than their benefit." They ask
    you how much are they to give, say,
    "The excess." Thus, God clarifies for
    you the signs that you may think.*

    4:43

    O you who acknowledge, do not come
    near the contact prayer while you are
    drunk, until you know what you are saying.
    Nor if you have had intercourse,
    unless traveling, until you bathe. If you
    are ill, or traveling, or one of you come
    from the bathroom, or you had sexual
    contact, and could not
    find water: then you shall seek clean soil
    and wipe your faces and hands. God is
    Pardoning, Forgiving.*

    5:90

    O you who acknowledge, intoxicants,
    and gambling, and altars, and arrows of
    chance are tools of affliction used by the
    devil. You shall avoid him so that you
    may be successful.*
     
    1 person likes this.
  9. bigtexxx

    bigtexxx Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    26,979
    Likes Received:
    2,363
    Iran is such an ass backwards country
     
  10. Qball

    Qball Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,151
    Likes Received:
    210
    This post is so out there...I dunno what to say. The part is bold is just......bleehhhhhhhhhhhh /brain explodes. You make it hard for me to criticize ATW.

    The bottom line is that NOBODY deserves to be executed for drinking alcohol. I don't care if these 2 guys were the stunt doubles for the "THE MOST INTERESTING MAN IN THE WORLD" commercials by Dos Equis. How can anyone from ANY religion some how justify putting the "crime" of consuming alcohol in the same category as murder or rape.

    And for those of you still searching for your eyeballs after they popped out of your heads reading the quoted above, make no mistake...the average Muslim does not share this view.
     
  11. txppratt

    txppratt Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    296
    Shariah law is barbaric, dark-ages fiddle faddle - why do cultures draw from this again?

    oh thats right... religion.
     
  12. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    21,110
    Likes Received:
    22,563
    You are forgetting the after-life punishment, which is far worse for rape/murder. So if you add up the earthly and afterlife punishment, then alcohol can be seen by Muslims as treated less harshly than rape/murder hence the lack of compassion for victims of such laws.

    Of course, it's all figurative. :rolleyes: It's interesting how statements are sometimes figurative, and other times not, and the distinction is never clear.
     
  13. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,281
    That "logic" is mind-bogglingly r****ded.
     
  14. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    I realize my view is colored by where I grew up..the values I know from that...but I can't imagine justifying this on any level.

    What is the value of a faith compelled by the threat of death? What is the virture of the disciplines of faith if you're carrying them out not with the fear of God but the fear of a government executing you? How does that move one closer to God?

    I can disagree all day on whether drinking is something that causes you to fall away from faith...I think for some it causes them to be less of a human being than they could be otherwise. I'm also of a faith tradition where the "founder" supplied a wedding with the finest wine. I've had some of the most meaningful conversations in my life over a pint with friends. But the question is not whether it is prohibited in the faith...but whether it should be the law of the land for everyone. So what's the goal...is it to move people closer to God, which would certainly seem to be a logical idea for a theocracy....or is it merely control? Are you really moving people to a position closer to God if you're doing so under the threat of death?

    I've read a great deal of the Koran. I'm certainly not a Muslim and I don't profess to be an Islamic scholar...but I'd venture to say that a man/woman who chooses what he/she believes Allah wants from them on his/her own, without government compulsion, is far closer to being a true Muslim than one who is forced to do so looking down the barrel of a gun -- or in this case the blade of a sword.
     
  15. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,281
    I just have to go back to the level of brainwashed idiocy displayed in this post.

    So, by the same logic, since the "after-life punishment is far worse for rape/murder" than for a parking violation, even if someone gets the death penalty for a parking violation, Muslims can still see this punishment as being treated less harshly than rape/murder and hence a lack of compassion for a victim of such a hypothetical law is ok.

    How completely idiotically twisted does someone's brain have to be to come up with such utter bullcrap? :confused:
     
  16. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    21,110
    Likes Received:
    22,563
    This is how many Muslims think, if we don't understand it (without necessarily having to believe it), then it would be far more difficult to solve these problems.

    You seem to be very caught up in how faith-based beliefs are unbelievable to you. Is it really shocking to you? Is this really the most ludicrous faith-based belief in your eyes? There are plenty, this is just another one which we should study, and then approach the subject of altering this view.

    I find that a slight increase in education regarding research tends to dramatically reduce the level of blind faith. If you communicate to a Muslim that you and him/her are both seeking to eliminate all blind faith other than that pertaining to the existance of God, they will understand. There is no need to have such faith in disciples, companions, centuries-late books, all sorts of frivelous things. Faith in a supreme being on its own is no detriment to anyone else.
     
  17. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,790
    Likes Received:
    41,226
    I think what upsets people are faith based laws, not faith based beliefs. Actually, "faith based beliefs" as a concept is nonsensical, with all due respect, "faith" being the basis for religion, any religion, and religion is a belief one has about something larger than his or her self. In my opinion, of course. As someone who's traveled extensively around the world, I think I can safely say, based on my own observations, but also on what I've read (and I read a hell of a lot), that this mad act by authorities in Iran is inexcusable, and will be seen as inexcusable by the overwhelming majority of those who hear about it, wherever they are on this planet. Again, this is my opinion, grounded in my own experiences, extensive interaction with people of different nationalities and cultures, and my own avid interest. I would have left out all the crap about traveling, talking to people of different cultures, etc., and the stuff about me reading a lot, but I'm assuming someone will ask what I'm basing my opinion on.

    Honestly, are people actually arguing over the "right and wrong" of this? Seriously? The very idea that it is a topic of discussion, and not just a thread of condemnation, something that happens here from time to time, astonishes me. How could anyone, anyone, be stupid enough to defend this.

    "Faith in a supreme being on its own is no detriment to anyone else."

    Unless it gets them killed, or gets someone else killed.
     
  18. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    21,110
    Likes Received:
    22,563
    I agree with you. But killing someone else for faith requires faith in something beyond a supreme being i.e. faith in "divine" texts, ideological authority figures, etc. The existance of a supreme being does not promp any particular dangerous behavior.

    What I was trying to communicate is that, for example, being agnostic is not detrimental to anyone because it does not lend credibility to texts, authority figures, etc. Of course, being agnostic does not necessarily mean you won't be violent and murderous, as we've seen.

    Having said that, we must accept the reality that the majority of the world believes in faith-based laws which supercede man-made laws, and since faith-based laws are potentially dangerous to those who don't share that faith, we have to gain a higher understanding of why these beliefs exist and what drives the believers and come up with a framework where infringing on other people's freedoms is as restricted as humanely as possible. It will never be perfect unless one side engages in mass murder to eradicate the vessels which hold those ideas. That's a great example too: the fact that murdering extremists creates more extremism is embedded in Muslim texts and we shouldn't ignore that unless we all agree to ignore that. It's all good and well deciding to ignore it from across the Atlantic when you know that the targets' weapons don't extend past the Middle East. This is why it's paramount for the Middle Eastern people to be on board, especially since Middle Easterners know and understand these beliefs, their consequences, and their application better than anyone else and most of them do not share the beliefs which relate to terrorism.

    I am more interested in finding a workable solution which protects people, than I am in being endlessly critical and hateful towards these people. For that reason, I'm willing to understand them, negotiate with them, and even make some sacrifices if I feel there will be a positive return on those sacrifices in the long-run.

    But this is not the biggest of my concerns nor do I subscribe to the belief that this is causing the most terror in the world. I believe that people have real grievances and that religion (or any ideology for that matter) is a framework for dealing with questions, grievances, etc. For that reason, I think our time is far more effectively used settling the real underlying grievances. We can attack the framework, destroy it, anihilate it, but the grievances will exist and additional grievances (which should be low priority) are tagged on. New or altered frameworks will emerge for dealing with new grievances.

    Have we perhaps considered how many people can be dissuaded from joining terror networks by offering full true sovereignty, growing local industry, by offering universal suffrage so the grievances can be dealt with locally, by creating educational alliances rather than military alliances? These are all small things which we can do to make a significant change IMO and doesn't require us to get into the ambiguous field of fighting part of an ideology that has been re-constructed millions of times over.
     
  19. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,281
    What does that rambling post have to do with two people being sentenced to death for drinking alcohol?
     

Share This Page