1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Culberson wins House ban on federal aid for Metro lines along Richmond, Post Oak

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by da1, Jul 3, 2012.

  1. da1

    da1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    101
    Advocates of federally subsidized expansion of the Houston Metro light rail system lost a crucial round to Houston Congressman John Culberson on Friday, leaving dwindling opportunities to overturn spending restrictions on the Richmond Avenue project.

    The House adopted a $51.6 billion spending measure on a 261-163 vote that included Culberson’s ban on federal spending for any Metro expansion along Richmond Avenue and Post Oak Boulevard. The measure also requires an in-depth audit of the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County by the inspector general of the Department of Transportation.

    In a boost for Metro, the spending package included $200 million in 2013 to support continued work on the lines in the North Corridor and Southeast Corridor.

    House approval stands as “a significant milestone in my determined effort to protect Houston taxpayers from Metro’s profligate spending and to protect the quality of life for property owners along Richmond Avenue and Post Oak Boulevard,” Culberson said. “I have always promised to guard the gate of the public treasury from wasteful and unwanted government spending.”

    ‘Remain hopeful’

    The House vote left Metro supporters holding their fire and looking to deliberations by a House-Senate conference committee later this year to make the final decision on a ban included in the House bill but not included in the Senate version.

    “We will await the outcome of the normal process in the House and Senate,” said Metro Chairman Gilbert Garcia. “We remain hopeful that Congress will respect the wishes of local voters on local issues, as is normally the case.”

    Robin Holzer, of the pro-Metro Citizens Transportation Coalition, said voters and civic organizations have voiced strong support for light rail construction along both Richmond Avenue and Post Oak Boulevard.

    “Culberson is pandering to a handful of his supporters at the long-term expense of this district,” Holzer said. “Marketing himself as “Letting Texans run Texas,” while pushing his personal anti-rail agenda in Washington is ironic.”

    Retiring Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, a member of the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee, will be squarely in the middle of any House-Senate negotiations on Culberson’s spending restriction.

    “We have shown Senator Hutchison‘s staff that these two Metro lines are unaffordable, unnecessary and unwanted,” Culberson told the Houston Chronicle after the House vote. “I am very optimistic that Senator Hutchison will support our effort because it only affects my congressional district, it’s very personal to me and we have a long tradition in the Texas delegation of ‘your district is your business.’ ”

    Supports other lines

    Spokesman Tom Flanagin, leaving wide room to maneuver, said neither Hutchison nor her staff were “commenting on this at this time.”

    Culberson emphasized his continued support for federal funding for lines along the North Corridor and Southeast Corridor that he said were backed by voters in a 2003 referendum. Culberson contends neither voters nor property owners along the Richmond Avenue and Post Oak Boulevard support Metro expansion along those routes.

    Members of the Houston-area congressional delegation, including Democratic Reps. Gene Green and Sheila Jackson Lee, said they would continue to support federal spending for Metro.

    stewart.powell@chron.com

    http://blog.chron.com/txpotomac/201...-aid-for-metro-lines-along-richmond-post-oak/
     
  2. da1

    da1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    101
    With friends like these who needs enemies?
     
  3. thadeus

    thadeus Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,313
    Likes Received:
    726
    What a tool.
     
  4. TreeRollins

    TreeRollins Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,052
    Likes Received:
    102
    I don't often hear about politicians fighting for money to not come to their district.
     
  5. geeimsobored

    geeimsobored Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    8,968
    Likes Received:
    3,389
    Well hopefully Hutchinson excludes that provision and she wins out in a fight during conference committee.
     
  6. dachuda86

    dachuda86 Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    16,325
    Likes Received:
    3,586
    The petrol engine is the way of the future my young boy!!!
     
  7. mfastx

    mfastx Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2009
    Messages:
    10,309
    Likes Received:
    3,913
    Culberson is incorrect in his assessment that the Richmond line is unwanted. Houston voters have already approved the line and the majority of people in his district support the line.
     
  8. Bandwagoner

    Bandwagoner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    27,105
    Likes Received:
    3,757
    He is talking about the property owners along the proposed construction. Considering how long it takes METRO to construct a glorified bus stop, I don't blame them.
     
  9. mfastx

    mfastx Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2009
    Messages:
    10,309
    Likes Received:
    3,913
    Unfortunately, a small amount of property owners along one street are not the majority of the people. There are many property owners along Richmond that are in favor of the line.

    Richmond Avenue as a street will be reconstructed sometime in the future anyway, which takes just as long as constructing light rail.
     
  10. Bandwagoner

    Bandwagoner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    27,105
    Likes Received:
    3,757
    That just isn't true based on METRO's previous performance.
     
  11. Xerobull

    Xerobull ...and I'm all out of bubblegum
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2003
    Messages:
    36,966
    Likes Received:
    35,882
    The buggy whip cartel shall oppose this devil's spawn until it's last breath!
     
  12. RocketMan Tex

    RocketMan Tex Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    18,452
    Likes Received:
    119
  13. thadeus

    thadeus Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,313
    Likes Received:
    726
    Those who don't give a **** about their district and are only gearing up for a run at a higher office....
     
  14. mfastx

    mfastx Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2009
    Messages:
    10,309
    Likes Received:
    3,913
    What about based on METRO's current performance? Many of the segments on the three lines currently under construction are already in their final traffic configuration (i.e. finished with the road construction). They are working on separate segments at a time, meaning less construction time per segment.
     
  15. cdastros

    cdastros Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Messages:
    1,925
    Likes Received:
    1,471
    Richmond Avenue is a mess. It needs road work bad.
     
  16. Blake

    Blake Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Messages:
    9,970
    Likes Received:
    3,005
    I'm glad this happened.

    While our public transportation system is a joke, this city isn't built for a few light rail lines to make a huge difference, especially considering cost/inconvenience during construction.

    If we had a subway system all over the city built years ago it would be a different thing altogether.

    Reading the other thread, I realize that I am in the minority on this
     
  17. Sajan

    Sajan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2009
    Messages:
    9,322
    Likes Received:
    7,115
    WOHOOO...3RD METRO RAIL THREAD!

    come on clutchfans..we can do more!
     
  18. thadeus

    thadeus Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,313
    Likes Received:
    726
    A citywide elevated rail system would reduce construction times, prevent severe disruption of traffic, and allow for expansion across the entire area at a reasonable pace. An elevated rail system would also allow for increased use of commercial space above ground level.

    It'd also make Houston a truly world-class city.

    ...unfortunately, I guess there weren't any contractors with the right connections to the local government who were interested in building an elevated rail system.
     
  19. Joshfast

    Joshfast "We're all gonna die" - Billy Sole
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2001
    Messages:
    6,517
    Likes Received:
    2,183
    I was once told MEtro is full of lib pigs so ya'll YEEEEE HAHHHH WE GOT EM!!!!!!!!!!

    [​IMG]

    No taxes ya'll! infrustructure mifminstructure no spending, no health care, no education! NO progress!! Politics ya'll!!!!!!!! hell yeah hoot and hollerin YEEEE HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!
     
    1 person likes this.
  20. Nero

    Nero Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    6,447
    Likes Received:
    1,429

    :rolleyes:
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now