1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Would you be happy or sad if the Rockets resemble the Pacers in a couple of years?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by meh, May 14, 2012.

  1. meh

    meh Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    16,161
    Likes Received:
    3,361
    I ask because you can sort of see a bit of Indy as a predecessor of the Rockets. Indy once had a very good team that competed every year. Then they got hit by the Ron Artest incident and Jermaine O'Neal's healthy deteriorated. So they also had to either scratch their entire team or rebuild.

    Indy decided not to tank. They have since traded for Barbossa, David West, Darren Collison, George Hill onto their 30+ win teams. They have made good draft picks in the middle of the draft, with Granger, George, and Hibbert being successes. But overall it's a team with full of average/above-average guys but no stars. At least no star above the level of what one may consider Lowry or Dragic to be.

    Now they have a team with a good roster but will never be a favorite to win any championship. But they can always have a shot if a things fall their way, like with Rose and Bosh's injuries this year. Long term outlook, they're still always going to be underdogs against Miami in the near future, and likely underdog against any WC finalist. But it's at least a winning team that can do something if the cards line up correctly.

    Does Indy look like a good team to you? Or is that just a higher level of mediocrity that the Rockets need to avoid?
     
  2. cooliobob

    cooliobob Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    450
    Likes Received:
    23

    You hit the spot with this last line here. You can pretty much group the 76ers, Magic, and Hawks into this very special group. Good enough to make the playoffs, but everybody knows they'll be going fishing sooner or later.

    All of these teams are examples of front offices over-committing to 2nd tier stars in hopes of building a championship contender. You avoid all band-aid solutions at all costs and you go "all-in" on TOP-SHELF talent. This means NO to Danny Granger, Joe Johnson, Rashard Lewis, and Andre Igoudala UNLESS you've got your Batman.
     
    2 people like this.
  3. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    It would be a good thing. Of course Indy is not quite an elite team and lacks a superstar player. However, they are (1) pretty good, (2) young and (3) have salary flexibility. As such, they have room to improve either through internal development, free agency or trades.

    http://www.shamsports.com/content/pages/data/salaries/pacers.jsp


    Makes no sense to lump Indy with Hawks, Philly and Orlando, teams that little salary space. You don't want to become a 48-ish win team with no more flexibility to improve. However, it's a whole different matter to be such a team but still have substantial salary space, picks, etc.
     
  4. cooliobob

    cooliobob Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    450
    Likes Received:
    23

    You're right in your assessment that Indy is better than the other 3, but they are missing that true superstar that will put them over-the-top. I lump them in the group with the other 3 because honestly speaking, nobody in the East tops a LeBron-Wade-Bosh combo. The Heat and the Bulls (before Rose went down) were on another level. The Pacers will be a good quality playoff team for years to come, but Indiana is pretty tough draw for big-time free agents and that's probably more or less a result of their geographical location.

    You're right though about the Pacers having a bit more flexibility than the other 3 teams, but I group all those teams in the same boat because they honestly don't stand a chance against the Heat for at least the next 3 years.
     
  5. cooliobob

    cooliobob Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    450
    Likes Received:
    23
    I guess my point is, if the Rockets are going to use a team as a measuring stick for success, you have to use the best teams in the league. There isn't a point in being the next Grizzlies or the next Pacers, when you have the Thunder and the Heat with their trios of top-shelf talent. The Rockets need to create a blueprint that will be able to compete with the Thunder and the Heat and not sell themselves short.
     
  6. david_rocket

    david_rocket Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,488
    Likes Received:
    834
    yep, very good example with the Pacers, look another Indy example:

    last year they had a record of 37-45, and still got in the playoffs, if they lose 3 or 4 more they could have picked with the 8th or 9th pick, but no, they wanted to play the playoffs as an 8th spot, knowing they would get eliminated in the 1st round, so instead of getting the 8th or 9th pick, they went and got the 15th pick.

    do you think Indy should tank to get a top 10 draft pick, or keep making the playoffs, with no real chance to the NBA finals?
     
  7. Raven

    Raven Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,984
    Likes Received:
    1,025
    Every single word is one hundred percent correct.
     
  8. ObamaFan

    ObamaFan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    1,796
    Likes Received:
    24
    You know whats ****ing sad... Its that we are sitting here talking about resembling the Pacers. But reastically we know Stern wont let us win a ring without a Superstar player( that generates intrest in the NBA)


    I almost feel bad for the Pacers, they dont have a shot in this series. Realistically them getting out of the first round againist the Orlando Magic was just to renew energy in their fanbase. Stern always does this crap


    You know what would stop this BS, is if every player was REFFED the same way. im sick of seeing guys like Parsons, Scola, Lowry, C.Lee, and Dragic on our team constantly drive to the basket.. get hammered and no ****ING call. And then a guy like Lebron or Westbrick get touch fouls and go to the LINE. Im sick of it, this is how Stern develops stars, rarely can guys make a simple 15-17 footer anymore. Its either a layup or a 3 pointer.

    I understand Wade is a GREAT player, but their should be no excuse for this guy to barely get touched, and start shooting free-throws on the littlest contact. Lebron as big as he is.. resorting to flopping.


    This is why LeBron and Wade absoulety SUCK in FIBA. Those international refs call everything they see, no BS calls. I'm telling you something right now, the most important players for Team USA this year will be Kevin Love, Kevin Durant, Kobe Bryant, and Chris Paul. With the injury bug happening around the NBA.. If 2 of those guys are gone, especially Durant and CP3, Team USA will get Bronze in London. Durant is the most important player on Team USA, because of solid fundamentals, and his game is best suited for either the NBA or FIBA



    I have no figured out why these star players wanna join forces and play for big cities. Not only do they move to better cities, but they get BIG help from the refs. But whatever man


    Im not saying the Pacers could beat the Heat. And im gonna concede that Pacers choked HARD in the closing minutes of Game 1. But thats usually what Stern does. He will give the underdog Game 1, to draw more viewers for Game 2.

    Anyways im drunk, and im going to sleep
     
    1 person likes this.
  9. rocketkid713

    rocketkid713 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    7
    yup iam100% with u
     
  10. meh

    meh Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    16,161
    Likes Received:
    3,361
    Given that the Heat's blueprint is not possible, the Rockets only course of action is to become the Bobcats. Would you be happy with that?
     
  11. daywalker02

    daywalker02 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Messages:
    98,896
    Likes Received:
    48,810
    Measuring stick obviously:
    Thunder

    Pacers are good....so I would be content
     
  12. hahachui

    hahachui Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2008
    Messages:
    1,267
    Likes Received:
    197
    I wont be happy.
    Current Pacer is not better than the Artest, Tracy, Yao Ming rockets
     
    1 person likes this.
  13. daywalker02

    daywalker02 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Messages:
    98,896
    Likes Received:
    48,810
    Front Office blew it.... They had the chance to get better teammates when JVG was here.
     
  14. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    Would you be happy if the Rockets resemble the Grizzlies in 4 or 5 years?

    They decided the Pau Gasol teams were not good enough and chose to tank. They have drafted at #2, #3 and #4.
     
  15. cooliobob

    cooliobob Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    450
    Likes Received:
    23

    Sadly, you are 100% correct with that assessment about the Heat blueprint being impossible to duplicate with the parameters set by new CBA agreement. However, people tend to forget that the Thunder were pretty abysmal for a few years before they lucked into Durant, Harden, Wesbrick (oops), and Ibaka. That's pretty much the blueprint that the Bobcats and several other teams are trying to imitate and I think that it's absolutely plausible for the Rockets to do the same. To be quite honest with you, it's the smartest thing to do while staying far enough under the cap to sign disgruntled superstars that might just turn up.

    I've been saying it for years, but the Rockets should have started the tanking process (don't mean to start any new tanking threads, think we've beat this topic to a pulp) maybe as early as last season when they knew they weren't going to be able to rely on Yao Ming any longer due to his rather rich injury history. This "swimming in mediocrity" business obviously isn't working for the Rockets and more than likely is going to set us back a few years.

    My parents always told me that if you were going to commit to something, you give it your all. In a league that only rewards the top teams and sadly, the worst teams (through the lottery), the Rockets should have went all-in for the Anthony Davis sweepstakes. If you've attended Rockets games recently, you've probably noticed the half-empty arena which pretty sums up the attitude of Rockets fans. They don't give a rat's ass about whether or not the Rockets will be able to make it to the playoffs--in the words of Beyonce (this is what the radio force feeds us), they want the Rockets to "Put a (damn) RING on it!"

    So the question becomes, if the Rockets were as bad as the Bobcats in their attempt to obtain Anthony Davis would I be mad? No. For the sake of the betterment of the franchise, I understand that sometimes you have to take a step back to move two steps forward. As a true Rockets fan, you understand that you pay your dues before you see your plans come into fruition. Everybody is laughing at the Bobcats right now, but once they land their top-shelf talent through the draft, nobody's gonna be laughing at them anymore (eventually even the player formerly known as "His Airness" has to get those picks right).
     
  16. meh

    meh Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    16,161
    Likes Received:
    3,361
    If we use some hindsight on the Grizzlies drafts, they could have

    Conley
    Harden(instead of Thabeet)
    Gay
    Love(instead of trading up for Mayo)
    Gasol

    That's a pretty sick starting lineup. And I'm being fairly reasonable here. They also screwed up the Xavier Henry pick, and one can say they should've traded down for Noah instead of taking Conley, because they had Lowry on the team already. But just preventing them from taking two huge busts in the draft would make them a legit contender for years.
     
  17. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    Yes, hindsight is nice, but nobody hits 100% even with lotto picks. Joe Dumars used a #2 pick on Darko even while he assembled a title team.

    The Rockets front office drafted Busty Morris this year, and might well **** another lotto pick. Who is to say they wouldn't have gone after the highly touted Mayo or have drafted someone other than Harden (like Tyreke Evans or Curry)?
     
  18. meh

    meh Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    16,161
    Likes Received:
    3,361
    Actually, I thought it was what they should've done back when Yao went down and the Rockets had chance. Now, I'm not so certain. There are so many teams in the tanking business these days it's become a competitive business. So many teams sucking and only so many slots at the top of the lottery.
     
  19. meh

    meh Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    16,161
    Likes Received:
    3,361
    I don't know. I think it's reasonable to think Morey would not have wanted a 2-guard with attitude problems over a smart all-around PF. Nor would he have drafted Thabeet when Harden and Rubio were on the board.

    And drafting a bust at 14 is much different from the top of the draft. The further up you get, the more certainty you have for prospects, relatively speaking of course. At least, the Rockets are unlikely to whiff huge at the top of the draft.
     
  20. daywalker02

    daywalker02 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Messages:
    98,896
    Likes Received:
    48,810
    I am confident we will be drafting better. Thabeet as the 2nd pick,
    Mike Conley Jr. solid but not great, and took too long to develop 4th pick
    Xavier Henry as the 12 pick and traded away Kevin Love the 5th pick

    Out of 4 lottery picks only one turned out to be a solid starter
    Sure does not look like Daryl
     

Share This Page