You actually tried to cover your insults and on-grave pissing with a little "excuse me" card clause. So obvious. completely PWN3D
You know how hard it is to find the owner of jewelry. For all we know they located an owner for the jewelry... I'll say it again. A lot of people make poor decisions and don't get arrested. I'm sure, in due time, Martin would have also had a booking photo for us to see.
So in Martin's case you are fine with making up scenarios and assigning blame, but in the case of Zimmerman where an unarmed teen is now dead because of Zimmerman, you wouldn't want anything to possibly be said to cast Zimmerman in a negative light. Your bias is evident. The only question is why?
If the jewelry was reported stolen and the police have the jewelry it isn't that difficult to locate the owner for the jewelry. Your bias has already been demonstrated in this thread. You're making up scenarios. If the jewelry was ever reported as stolen the police would have known once they received it, that it was stolen. It didn't happen.
Some of you guys give me the creeps. Even if you think Martin is at fault for getting shot because he punched a guy who was stalking him from a car and then started chasing him on foot after he tried to runaway, at the very least you could leave it there and say he should have done something other than attack his unidentified pursuer instead of looking for any reason to think he was a criminal who deserved to die based on getting in trouble at school.
You are not real good at this... The kid didn't fully cooperate. The scenario was a counter to your weak assertion that jewelry wasn't stolen. Then you go to the ol Martin supporter ace in the hole racist card when you got nothing.
No, they wouldn't. That's a fact. Do you know how many thefts and burglaries there are in that part of Florida? Probably a lot. It may have even been stolen in another town.
Not cooperating or answering questions isn't proof of guilt. racist card? I didn't mention race at all. I've said it shouldn't really even be part of the case. I don't think it's relevant.
No, it isn't a fact. Do you know anyone who works for the police. They keep logs of evidence they get, and could easily compare it against the reports of stolen jewelry. Since you seem to know so much about it, why don't you tell me about how many thefts and burglaries there are there. I'm looking for something a little more precise than "probably a lot"
Don't get upset because you asked a question containing things that weren't fact, and I corrected you.
Again you are not too good at this. Go back and read what I said it was indicative of. So what's my bias then?
Your bias is against Martin. I was asking why? You have no idea what Martin's not naming names is indicative of. Nobody does now. There could be dozens of possible reasons. Of course it doesn't matter, and it has nothing to do with what Martin was doing the night he was killed.
It kinda gives us the creeps that you distort the facts with your description of the events while leaving out Zimmerman may have a legitimate case of self defense. Meanwhile he is getting death threats from a blood thirsty lynch mob that is being fueled by the media and to some extent the Martin Family who are desperate to poison public opinion with some bull**** tactics.
There seems to be a lot of discussion about Trayvon Martin's character. I don't think he was the world's best kid, he apparently had issues, from theft, school suspension and possible petty drug dealing. However, why is it relevant? As far as I know no stolen goods or burglar tools were found on him. Therefore from a legal stand point his character is a non issue, so were his father's parenting skills. All of this is just a red herring, ALL that matters at this point is what transpired that night. It is going to come down to forensics and how credible Zimmerman is on the stand... It is irrelevant what Martin did in the past.
