Trayvon Martin

So you cannot tell me who they were. Quit trying to BS people and troll.

 

You don't need a name. You need to know their official position because that's all that's relevant in the case.

 

bingo

One must be a racist if they try to defend the guy who was accused of being racist without any evidence.

The truth of the matter is that across110thstreet is frustrated because he clings to his initial bias that Zimmerman is a racist, yet he has no facts to support his claim.

 

Yes, but he made a mistake and said 'you don't need to follow...' -- that is much different than 'Don't follow the suspect' -- and we don't even know if GZ followed after him at all.

 

What he said may not have been the best way of putting it, but it's meaning was clear to any reasonable person.

 

Those who are now accusing Zimmerman were responsible for:

*the Crown Heights riots;

*Tawana Brawley;

*the Duke lacrosse case.

So, yeah - I'm skeptical.

 

This is essentially a meaningless post. The logic does not compute.

 

Not everyone supporting Martin was responsible for the above incidents.

 

Fixed that for you.

 

LOL. Love it.

 

No, but Crump couldn't wait to get Sharpton, etc involved in this thing. He wet himself at the opportunity and said he had made a mistake in an earlier case when he did not immediately bring in Race Hustlers, Inc.

 

Did GZ follow Martin or did he wait by his vehicle?

 

was treyvon's body found by GZ's vehicle?

 

I'm asking the ****ing questions here.

 

You're posting without any logic. The media has clearly been biased in this whole event -- an NBC employee even got canned for it!

You DO NOT KNOW HE WAS STEREOTYPED. You don't. You have nothing to prove that, or to even suggest it.

 

It's been a witch hunt from day 1.