1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Patrick Patterson vs ...

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by IzakDavid13, Apr 16, 2012.

?

Do you NOW think that we should've kept Jordan Hill?

  1. Yes- at least he can rebound

    63 vote(s)
    34.4%
  2. No- Patrick is a beast

    120 vote(s)
    65.6%
  1. sammy

    sammy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2002
    Messages:
    18,949
    Likes Received:
    3,528
    Btw, even your poll options are biased. Why does Pat have to be a beast to be better than Hill? :confused:
     
  2. mattrbowers

    mattrbowers Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2009
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    20
    You can tell when someone doesn't complete the thought on their thread title that they don't think it's all that good of a thread and people won't read it unless you tease them and leave out the last part.

    I like Pat ... but not how he's been playing over the past week or two. I want the Pat that can knock down the open shot, who is obviously working on his post game, and who hustles ... haven't seen that guy in a while.
     
  3. sealclubber1016

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    21,343
    Likes Received:
    34,343
    If pat looked different people wouldn't cut him as much slack, he looks the part of a beast, but he isn't one.

    He sucks at everything right now.

    Terrible rebounder, no post offense, bad finisher, doesn't block shots, and he's not even making the mid range iumpers consistenly. He's only a slightly better rebounder than Bud and Parsons right now.


    He's better than hill, but only because Hill is so awful, patterson should be on the bench right now, becasue he's simply not an effective player. Scola has played like crap the last couple of games too, but he's looked like Duncan compared to PP.

    3.3 rebounds per game over his last 20, are you freaking kidding me. 5.1 per 36. Over that same stretch, shooting 38% from the field.
     
  4. sealclubber1016

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    21,343
    Likes Received:
    34,343
    Just checked his adjusted plus minus.


    - 9.71 this year, he's actually fallen below hill, I didn't think that was possible. Dead last. His 2 year number of -6.71 is also the worst of the current rockets.


    This guy really sucks. I've been cutting him slack all year, whether its' the injury or not he's hurting the team and shouldn't be playing. Work on this crap in the offseason.
     
  5. merrrlo

    merrrlo Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    599
    Likes Received:
    200
    This. I liked Hill a little better, but I'd rather have Patterson+a pick than Hill+Patterson (and we don't know what he'd be worth to other teams at all)
     
  6. JLOBABYDADDY

    JLOBABYDADDY Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    195
    I always said hill was playing out of position at the 5 just because he was tall. He is really a PF and very effective at that position. Just like Chuck Hayes. PF's being judged for their ability to bang and rebound with true centers. That's like getting mad if chandler parsons can't guard Tim Duncan.
     
  7. thething

    thething Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    2,622
    Likes Received:
    261
    Don't judge a guy in his second season after a surgery.

    He has been a pretty solid player at times.
     
  8. T_Man

    T_Man Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2000
    Messages:
    6,862
    Likes Received:
    2,885
    Unfortunately, the only thing that people see are stats...

    I've said this many many many times.. Stats don't tell the entire story...

    T_Man
     
  9. XIrocket

    XIrocket Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2011
    Messages:
    1,146
    Likes Received:
    34
    Zan Tabak > Patterson

    Earl Curten >Patterson

    Pete Chilcutt > Patterson
     
  10. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,892
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    You guys think that fine he got somehow affected him?
     
  11. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    38,109
    Likes Received:
    29,547
    This is my thought exactly.

    Patterson is not a beast. But I still prefer him over Hill because I believe he has a much better chance of becoming a good player than Hill does.
     
  12. ACL1

    ACL1 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    479
    Likes Received:
    115
    its been close to 6 months. bone chip removal form ankle does not need this much recovery . if anything he should be running and jumping better by now.
     
  13. T_Man

    T_Man Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2000
    Messages:
    6,862
    Likes Received:
    2,885
    Yes it does....

    If you look at most of the guys in the past who have had any type of surgery it takes them at least 1 to 2 years to get back to form...

    On top of that he's playing in a accelerated schedule.. Give them man some time before you decide to crucify him.

    T_Man
     
  14. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    38,109
    Likes Received:
    29,547
    I think featuring him in the post as one of the go to play at crunch time affects his confidence.
     
  15. HombreDeHierro

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,328
    Likes Received:
    42
    The surgery he had was not to repair a structural damage.

    It was to remove a loose piece. Stup apologizing for Patterson. He had MINOR SURGERY which is NOT SERIOUS

    HE SUCKS PLAIN AND SIMPLE
     
  16. Dreamin

    Dreamin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    5,603
    Likes Received:
    63
    He sucks but no where near the level of Jordan Hill suckage. Hill hasnt even logged 3 mins in LA.
     
  17. JMAD21

    JMAD21 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2010
    Messages:
    4,288
    Likes Received:
    870
    Why are polls always the most extreme choices??

    Yes, Patrick Patterson is better, no he is not a beast!!
     
  18. Dei

    Dei Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2006
    Messages:
    7,362
    Likes Received:
    335
    You're an idiot. Anybody who has this opinion is an idiot. Anybody who voted that Hill is better is an idiot.
     
  19. Rip Van Rocket

    Rip Van Rocket Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    356
    Last year I thought Patterson played much better than Hill. He didn't have any low post game, but he seemed to give a better effort, and seemed to understand the game better than Hill. I was very high on Patterson, but at this point, I have about given up on Patterson being a quality PF in the near future.

    Watching Morris play last night he looked too small to play PF, he just isn't very big. At this point I've got my fingers crossed that Donatas Motiejūnas will be with us next year and that he will at least be decent backup to Scola. Right now we have nothing playing behind Scola. I wish we still had Adrien on the team, at least he wasn't afraid to mix it up with the big boys under the basket.
     
  20. IzakDavid13

    IzakDavid13 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2011
    Messages:
    9,958
    Likes Received:
    801
    This is 'in hindsight'.

    I hope Patrick proves me wrong, I love it when his jumper is falling. But when it's not falling and he's not rebounding and not playing defence and not finishing breaks, he is costing us dearly out there on the court.

    But if he is not over his injury, or what ever, get over it or sit...this is the NBA! Marcus Camby is playing with one hand for goodness sake!
     

Share This Page