It's official...you Sir are moron. It's clear that what bigtexx and nwayneco meant in every possible way, but since neither actually WROTE what I wrote means they do not feel that way? Even though it's clear that they do...So you want to win and debate just for the sake of winning a debate. Ok...you win
Neither of them said that. You claimed that they said that, verbatim. They did not. It is your conclusion that that is why they are not agreeing with everyone else that he is most probably guilty, but that's not what they said.
Sooooo you're not answering the question. You see and answer my insults on que Maybe you didn't see it Do you BELIEVE that Zimmerman PROBABLY had just cause to shoot Trayvon AND we all should wait and hold judgment because the media is bias.
I never said verbatim old man...i used VERBATIM while asking you if you thought I said the said "They BELIEVE that Zimmerman PROBABLY had just cause to shoot Trayvon AND we all should wait and hold judgment because the media is bias. " verbatim I've made it clear that this is what those two believed. Who cares if they didn't write what i wrote verbatim...word for word. This is how they feel...This is so stupid. I feel sorry for your wife, if you're even married.
This is false. You are putting words in my mouth that I did not say. Why are you so adamant in insisting that I said these things? Because you WANT me to say them? I've never said them. What I've maintained since the beginning is that we need more facts to determine whether or not Martin acted in self-defense or not. That is not the same as saying that Zimmerman had just cause.
sjackson0, I didn't insult you once, and I even agree with your assessment of the situation, yet, you have been insulting me repeatedly, just because I pointed out that you were presenting your opinion/a conclusion rather than something they actually said explicitly. Sorry, I understand that this senseless killing hits close to home for you, but you seem to have some anger issues.
LMAO...the party of no Soooo Do you BELIEVE that Zimmerman PROBABLY had just cause to shoot Trayvon AND we all should wait and hold judgment because the media is bias. Zimmerman could have been acting in self-defense??
I do....I have real anger issues. I’m allergic to r****dation...makes me itch. You're arguing about nonsense and it's silly TO ME. Bigtexx and Gwayneco are trolling bigots and spent days trying to defend Zimmerman by implying that he probably had just cause shooting that kid and that the media is bias. It's all over the board...all you had to do is read it....read between the lines or dissect it....regardless, it's plain as day. Of course I didn't expect trolling race baiters to agree with me! They are lying trouble makers that are too scared to admit how they really feel. I don't need you to tell me about my issues...I'm fine. Tend to your own; you started with me yesterday when I never made one comment to you. So let me be and I will deal with my "anger issues".....I'm man enough to admit any issue I might have. I’m done for the day
According to sir Jackie .... If I say that bigtexx said Obama is an idiot and sir Jackie wants proof... Well I cant find where bigtexx actually said Obama is an idiot because what he actually said was Obama was a nincompoop. Based on sir Jackie's rules of life.... What bigtexxx said about obama never happened. Right
Your example is different. In this example, you are swapping one insult for another. What actually happened on this thread, though, is not that they said "he probably had just cause", but that they asked for more facts and refused to condemn Zimmerman without more evidence. I happen to think there is easily enough evidence to form an opinion (that Zimmerman is most probably guilty). You assume an ulterior motive, you think they are racist. But to say things like they would also murder someone in the same setting (like vlaurelio did) and some other things that were said are just way over the top.
After our discussion over the whole "blacks making deliveries" debacle yesterday and now this, you truly are all about technicalities. It's pretty easy to read between the lines but it has to always be verbatim for you. Look at all those hypotheticals he threw out, they are all in the form of Martin provoking the situation giving Zimmerman a reason to act the way he did. Bigtexxx's main concern has been Zimmerman's bloody nose, not the kid that died. Those hypotheticals plus his concern for the shooter's bloody nose, it is clear that he feels Zimmerman had a reason to kill him.
do you believe that sanford police was right in immediately declaring it was self-defense based solely on the shooter's ignoring other evidence such as other witness accounts and the 911 transcripts? given that its a given than anyone involved in a shooting should be given a alcohol and drug test but sanford police did not do it. do you think what they did is correct?
My conclusion is different: I think he is exposing blind anger. He is too intelligent not to think that Zimmerman is probably guilty. Is he (in my opinion) playing with some of you guys to some extent? Yes. But that doesn't make him a racist and, if anything, some of the reactions of some posters here prove his point - some people here are driven by hate and blind anger, rather than rationality.
so for you the facts which are available so far point that zimmerman did not do anything wrong? like there is not the slightest chance that is is guilty of anything?
No, seriously, do you have reading comprehension issues? Even my post you quoted says the opposite of what you are asking me. I posted like 20 times on this thread that I think Zimmerman is guilty.
so why say bigtexxx is too intelligent NOT to think that zimmerman's probably guilty? everyone here including you that think zimmerman is probably guilty are not too intelligent and driven by hate and blind anger?
