1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Surveillance Drones Over U.S. To Be 30,000 By 2020

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Hightop, Feb 8, 2012.

  1. QdoubleA

    QdoubleA Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    4,767
    Likes Received:
    256
    YES! I listened to that segment. The speaker said the drones are unprecedented and would require a supreme court decision. I don't know much about AI, but I was shocked at the idea of giving the drone autonomy to choose targets to follow and eliminate. Also surprising was the part where she talked about how fighter pilots don't do well flying or controlling (monitoring) the drones and that people off of the street with video game experience did very well. I believe she said pilots (like herself) got too board and anxious just sitting in a trailer watching screens so the idea of creating a job in the military strictly for people to fly drones is being kicked around. BUT the risk of developing PTS was way higher in non military trained drone pilots. Possibly killing dozens of people in one shot is a lot of weight to carry.
     
  2. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,807
    Likes Received:
    20,465
    Over the US the operator has to be in sight of the drone. Those are the regulations. It isn't by requirement of the drone, but it is by requirements regulating their use in the US. They also have fly below a certain altitude. It is via FAA, and they basically have the same restrictions as remote control planes. It could change and that's when we'll really have to worry.
     
  3. da_juice

    da_juice Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    1,070
    I think I read somewhere that some european countries are considering doing this too.
     
  4. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,168
    Likes Received:
    48,335
    Sorry my bad. I thought you were talking about capabilities not regulations.. That said if that is the regulation it seems like that would greatly handicap some of the beneficial things of drones, such as if you were flying one into a disaster area to look for survivors where it is very dangerous to be sending people in.
     
  5. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,807
    Likes Received:
    20,465
    Well that's true. But maybe those areas will be open enough that a person can be back from the actual site and still see the plane. I don't know it would just be totally situational what they could do with the regulations in place.
     
  6. Johndoe804

    Johndoe804 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,233
    Likes Received:
    147
    <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/b1B_pZC8aWU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
  7. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,807
    Likes Received:
    20,465
    Just a bit of irony here. Libertarians would naturally be against the govt. being able to spy on citizens with drones and that kind of big govt. operation.

    They are also against plenty of regulations and federal agencies.

    Yet it is the federal agency and regulations (FAA) that make it more difficult for the drones to be used as they are over seas reducing their effectiveness as far as spying and things like that.
     
  8. bnb

    bnb Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2002
    Messages:
    6,992
    Likes Received:
    316
    ...meanwhile, Google's already monetizing this.
     

Share This Page