1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

SI: Rockets "in the lead" for Chris Kaman

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Clutch, Feb 1, 2012.

  1. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,052
    Likes Received:
    15,227
    I don't see Thabeet/Hill meeting the salary matching rule. They earn $8m combined, so we can only bring $12m back, I think. Kaman makes $14m. Throwing in T-Will too would get them to $10.4, which would save NOH the proration of $3.7m.

    Anyway, obviously this trade isn't worth throwing in any real assets for, except maybe a 2nd rounder or something. Even if the Knicks pick isn't a franchise-saver, it's worth more than a half-year rental, which is all this is.
     
  2. Da_Spark

    Da_Spark Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    3,515
    Likes Received:
    244
    Kaman would also be a nice trade asset to have with his expiring contract in case Morey would take a shot at acquiring D12 since Orlando would want to unload Hedo's contract. Martin,scola,kaman + fillers for Dwight and Hedo. Then D-will signs with us to team up with Dwight and the pipedream scenario is complete. Hence, Morey becomes God in H-Town.
     
  3. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    Not that either team would do it, but this opens up the possibilities for more scenarios. I'd give them Scola to get back the Minnesota pick. The Rockets could amnesty Scola if they really need the cap space in the offseason, but I'm sure Le$ doesn't want to keep paying someone whose not producing. And it lets them amnesty someone else down the road. If the Rockets then go on to miss the playoffs... as the potentially would without Scola, they would 3 first round picks, most likely at best in the 9-15 range, but that does give you something to work with.
     
  4. BigBenito

    BigBenito Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    7,355
    Likes Received:
    175
    Clicked link with a frown. Saw the names being thrown about. Left smiling.
     
    1 person likes this.
  5. 45souf

    45souf Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    609
    Likes Received:
    14
    If he pulled that off, He would be KING...KING
     
  6. HamJam

    HamJam Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    2,601
    Likes Received:
    541
    It's Stern, not Tony Parker.
     
  7. stmeph

    stmeph Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2011
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    7
    How is it pointless? We're not keeping Thabeet, Hill, or ANY of the '09ers. Alexander wants to make the playoffs, and Kaman would contribute more than any of the '09 lottery crew.

    Kaman is a bigger expiring contract than Thabeet and Hill combined, and we have already elected not to exercise the options on their contracts. I'm not sure about the new CBA, but under the old CBA we would be able to trade Kaman immediately at the deadline if -- from our end -- he's involved in a deal only by himself; he cannot be packaged with other players. Obviously there could be two simultaneous/parallel trades in concert, but he wouldn't be able to be combined with other salary to get a bigger contract. It's an extra $2 million or so by the end of the season, where every dollar matters in the Howard & Williams chase. (Citation by Bima needed.)

    This fits our general MO: improve the team wherever possible + salary cap flexibility
     
  8. RedDragon01

    RedDragon01 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    560
    Likes Received:
    81
    I think you're way off base here.

    First, the Minn pick was brought up to describe the incentive that the Hornets would have in trading Kaman to the Rockets, because we'd be competing with the Timberwolves for that playoff spot, thus the Minn pick that NOH owns would become more valuable if they give us a better chance of reaching the playoffs. This as opposed to trading to a team that's already set to make the playoffs, a team that doesn't have a chance to make it, or any Eastern Conference team.

    Secondly, Houston would be trading for Kaman to increase their chances of making and advancing in the playoffs...no other obvious reason. Trading Scola away for Minnesota's pick this year would be counter-productive.
     
  9. Pete the Cheat

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    3,100
    Likes Received:
    487
    is there still a 60 day restriction to package players after a trade?

    I am sure there are ways around that rule by having a "separate deal" trading that player by themself
     
  10. Asian Sensation

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 1999
    Messages:
    18,256
    Likes Received:
    7,358
    I hope we can land him. This would be very good for us. Especially if we only lose Thabeet/Hill + filler.

    Kaman can definitely play and this move adds another skilled 7 footer to our squad. Dalembert/Kaman would be a poor but tougher man's version of Gasol/Nene but way more cost effective while providing flexibility.

    You can never have enough skilled big men. I love this potential trade.
     
  11. passdarock

    passdarock Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    612
    Likes Received:
    31
    You are right, it is not a stretch to assume they can make a change in the right direction but by the same logic boston, milwaukee, and cleveland may continue to win games and downright beat the knicks for that 7-8th playoff spot.

    The Knick's talent is not reflected by their record, I know, but that is a ongoing problem to which they have no solution. Keep in mind, they have an 8-13 record with one of the easiest schedules in the league. Its disappointing to say the least.

    Ultimately, I don't see the knick going to the playoffs with this team.
     
  12. The Cat

    The Cat Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    20,808
    Likes Received:
    5,282
    I'm surprised the Kaman talks have dragged on as long as they already have. Kaman has been out for over a week while they've been fielding offers - obviously, it does him no good to sit at home not getting reps. In theory, since Kaman is a one-year rental, his value to other teams (such as us) goes down with each passing week. Meanwhile, the Hornets need to play these young pieces (Thabeet/Hill/Williams) themselves to see if they have any value.

    I get that you want to shop for all offers, but with over a week gone, I think Demps should know what he can reasonably get. Makes sense for both sides to get together and nail this out ASAP (preferably today).
     
    1 person likes this.
  13. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,892
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    If it improves our cap space, then OK. Didn't consider that.
     
  14. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,567
    Likes Received:
    7,091
    Trading expiring contracts for expiring contract? Color me unimpressed. Not saying I wouldn't do it, but I think Jordan Hill could net a pick.

    The rest of the 09ers? Take them all.
     
  15. Rudy

    Rudy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2011
    Messages:
    455
    Likes Received:
    527
    Does this mean we're open to trading for Pau Gasol to pair him up with Kaman?
     
  16. RedDragon01

    RedDragon01 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    560
    Likes Received:
    81
    I believe the only way getting Kaman improves our cap space, if we trade 2 of the 09ers as the center pieces, is if we also include a player with a contract through next season as well. Otherwise, we're just taking on more salary that's over the cap. And that's salary that doesn't do us any more good than just letting the two 09ers expire.
     
  17. ArtV

    ArtV Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    6,994
    Likes Received:
    1,700
    I think so. We wouldn't say anything because it wouldn't do any good to the existing team.

    Now NOLA on the other hand...they don't care about Kaman knowing and they are trying to increase their offers by saying this is what I'm getting...beat it and you can have him. Now hopefully the Patterson and pick talk are just Demps throwing some bluff talk. Kaman is worth either of them IMO. Kaman for 09ers - take it or leave it.
     
    #97 ArtV, Feb 1, 2012
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2012
  18. RV6

    RV6 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    25,522
    Likes Received:
    1,109
    hmm...they list Pat as if he were a filler...SMH...i would hope we dont trade him or a first rounder... looks like NO gets to screw minny over by helping us win more games this year...we get to make the playoffs (probably) and make a short run that's going to create some buzz and make Les some more dough. ANd we still get the cap space anyway...i guess it's better than nothing.
     
  19. skenney1993

    skenney1993 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2009
    Messages:
    551
    Likes Received:
    286
    Morey should drag the talks out to the deadline then offer Scola, Hill, Ppat, Thabeet, Clee and NY 1st for Kaman, Gordan, and Henry.
     
  20. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    Well I specifically said it was neither team's thinking. I, personally, would like it because (1) arguing that Minnesota is ONLY battling against Houston for a playoff spot is ignoring the fact that Minnesota is currently behind Portland and Memphis also, who are both also not currently in the playoffs, and (2) while adding Kaman for crap should help the team make the playoffs, adding Kaman for Scola would do the opposite. Kaman is not that good. For the Rockets, I'd love. It'd be a way to pseudo-tank... why the Hornets would want Scola for the Twolves draft pick... no idea, they wouldn't. I was just dreaming :)
     

Share This Page