1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

SI: Rockets "in the lead" for Chris Kaman

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Clutch, Feb 1, 2012.

  1. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    15,292
    Likes Received:
    18,528
    Morey would be crazy to include the Knicks' pick for anything less than Gordon. But i wouldn't mind throwing in Patterson and Dragic (UFA) for the Minny pick. Even if it's fools gold, we could package it with the Knicks' pick for a real chance at a top 7 player.
     
  2. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    if we do that for a guy who is likely to be a backup center, morey should be fired immediately.
     
  3. FLASH21

    FLASH21 Heart O' Champs

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Messages:
    13,780
    Likes Received:
    5,719
    I wouldn't want them on the court at the same time, only because that would mean more minutes that Kaman could be risking on opportunity to get re-injured.

    He should have his minutes limited the way we were gonna try with Yao once he fully returned from foot surgery.
     
  4. RedDynasty

    RedDynasty Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    4,164
    Likes Received:
    122
  5. passdarock

    passdarock Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    612
    Likes Received:
    31
    NO! We need the 1st round pick. Plus, NO is going to give up Gordon. They plan on building around him. And Landry, uhm...we have to many players at the 4 spot. No room.

    There is no reason to throw in a pick.
     
  6. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,892
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    He's an expiring contract, and if we're only giving up Hill/Thabeet then the only reason is to win more games this year. I don't see any other larger purpose to it.
     
  7. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    cool..thanks for your thoughts on this.
     
  8. FLASH21

    FLASH21 Heart O' Champs

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Messages:
    13,780
    Likes Received:
    5,719
    The way the article put it they were just suggesting to what other assets we could offer for Kaman, not what we would offer.

    It sounds like this deal is centered around Thabeet and Hill nothing more than a 2nd rounder if a pick is involved, I would say.

    Pump your brakes fellas.

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
     
    1 person likes this.
  9. passdarock

    passdarock Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    612
    Likes Received:
    31
    NO! We need the 1st round pick. Plus, NO is NOT going to give up Gordon. They plan on building around him. And Landry, uhm...we have to many players at the 4 spot. No room.

    There is no reason to throw in a pick.
     
  10. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    never said that's what they were doing, so you can save it...i was responding to a specific post where someone suggested it.
     
  11. batkins

    batkins Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,041
    Likes Received:
    1,505
    There's no way Morey would give them the NYC pick, especially in a deal for Kaman/expiring. We only part with that pick for a star.

    Thabeet, Hill, and either Flynn or T-Will sounds good. I don't really want to trade Williams because I still think he can be a player in this league, but it seems the Rockets are determined not to play him so it doesn't even matter. Why did we trade a first rounder for him again?
     
  12. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,671
    Likes Received:
    22,379


    Not that I think it should be done, because I dont. However, the 2012 Knicks pick is way overvalued on this board. I have a hard time believing that the Knicks wont pull it together at some point and get in the playoffs. The East is just too bad, and they have too much talent.

    Let me rephrase the question - If you knew the Knicks were going to make the playoffs and the pick would be the 15th at best, would you trade it for Kaman then???


    That being said, I know how Morey plays hardball with trades and he isnt going to throw in the 2012 pick for Kaman alone. Morey than likely Morey will try and get a third team involved to get the Hornets a pick and possibly move some other players to that third team for the pick.
     
  13. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    One of these things is not the same as the others. :)

    In any case, if the pieces listed first are Thabeet and Hill, I doubt Patterson or the NY pick will be "also included" as secondary pieces. They are assets that the Hornets will no doubt want, doesn't mean they are gonna get it.

    In any case, it's up to the other teams to decide whether they want to out-bid what is being offered.
     
  14. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    my answer is no. i would rather roll the dice with the 15th pick than use it to acquire Kaman at this point.
     
  15. psingh34

    psingh34 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    804
    Likes Received:
    64
    currently the knicks pick is valuable bc they are out of the playoffs. however with them being only 1.5 games out of the playoffs and the teams ahead of them being boston, milwalkee and cleveland, it is not a stretch to assume they will get their ship pointed in the right direction and make it to the playoffs at which time that pick becomes not as valuable bc then it becomes like the 16-17 pick.
     
  16. REEKO_HTOWN

    REEKO_HTOWN I'm Rich Biiiiaaatch!

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    47,487
    Likes Received:
    19,589
    No way he give them the pick. Maybe Budinger since he's been hot lately.

    Morris is the future at 3 anyways. I'd rather lose Bud than Patterson. Losing Patterson in this trade would be a huge loss unless they give us Aminu.
     
  17. FLASH21

    FLASH21 Heart O' Champs

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Messages:
    13,780
    Likes Received:
    5,719
    You weren't the only one suggesting that it was a possibility so it wasn't solely directed towards you. So no thanks.
     
  18. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,892
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    My preference is that we find a way to parlay the 09ers into a draft pick. Even if its just a second rounder, at least its something.

    Making a trade to improve our record this year and not improve the future is just ... meh.
     
  19. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    i wasn't suggesting it as a possiblity at all...responding to those who were. i don't see morey doing that...which is why i posted what i did.
     
  20. desi tmac91

    desi tmac91 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,206
    Likes Received:
    240
    I wouldn't do it at the price of our only 2012 first (the Knicks first) but if we could nab Kaman for just Thabeet, Hill and maybe something else then that would be incredible. I thought Kaman's beef with New Orleans was the lack of playing time and if we do land him then he is going to be backing up Dalembert.

    Either way it would be a good move on the Rockets' part.
     

Share This Page