Most panasonic Vieras are plasmas. They do sell LED LCD tvs too. MW3, SSF4AE runs perfect on my plasma.
That is basically what he said. but he did also said. . fagility is not a big deal because you rarely move a TV. Rocket River
High Cost - Sharp Elite: http://elitelcdtv.com/ Review: http://www.hometheater.com/content/sharp-elite-pro-60x5fd-3d-led-lcd-hdtv Low Cost/Good Value: Sharp 60 LED for $999 http://www.hometheaterequipment.com/showthread.php/1058-Sharp-Prices-60-inch-LED-HDTV-Under-A-Grand! Plasma: Panasonic seems to have a good reputation for a quality picture.
Step 1: Build a time machine Step 2: Go back 4 years and buy a Pioneer Kuro Step 3: Head back to 2012 Step 4: Comment how your tv is still better than 99% of the TV's out on the market.
I researched new TVs last year, and ended up buying a 60" Panasonic Plasma. Very happy with it -the picture quality is fantastic. In my opinion, Plasma is a much better option than LCD or LED. For me, the decision came down to why would I pay more for a TV that worse picture quality?
After speaking with the BB reps and research on AVS, it seems like picture quality lowers after 2 yrs? Is that true?
Never heard anything like that. I've only had the 60" for about 6 months, but I have ownd another 50" Panasonic Plasma for about 5 years and I cannot say I have noticed any deterioration. I have heard that the brigthness of plasmas (actually I don't know if this applies to LCDs as well) reduces over time, but once again I have not noticed this.
