Not quite yet. Our strength of schedule is still up through last night one of the hardest in the NBA.
What? The 1st ten games were against some of the best in the league. Come on Dreamin. You are still hanging on to the hate.
First of all, there's nothing unusual about something being both true and funny. Secondly, that's not the truth.
Really? Holy sh-t man, you're smarter than this. This is obviously a middle of the pack team, and did not look like "the worst we have seen since the pre Ralph draft" then or now. We look and have looked mediocre, which is why we're 7-7, not 2-12 or 12-2. Everyone knew we would get wins against the lower teams. That's why this thread exists. Dalembert obviously makes more than "ZERO difference in most games" now and just needed time to adjust. It's clear why we signed him.
My problem is that the Rockets have been at best middle of the pack for over a decade now. But this might be the wrong thread for it.
On that I agree with you 100%. This "good, but not good enough" sh-t is getting old. DD's quote just went too far in the other direction.
When had just lost a close game at the Lakers, lost the 2nd of a b2b against the Clippers, and lost at OKC without Lowry. We did not look "the worst we have seen since the pre Ralph draft". This team has looked MUCH worse since then. You overreacted.
Isn't not looking that bad really the worst case scenario? A team not being good enough to bring talent to help contend, and not being bad enough to get help through the draft sounds pretty bad to me.
We are NOT in tank mode. You are are the equivilant of an a** pirate for saying that. Our team and coach do not want to lose at all, so people need to stop saying it.