It's okay. We will wait for your facts, and until then we will remind you that we are waiting for your facts.
You should follow your own advice and quit listening to what everybody tells you to think about history. I gave my reasoning behind why I didn't agree that these men were great Presidents based on their actions. Maybe you should think for yourself.
He's definitely not the worst, but he has the potential to be. I'd say the worst was George W. Bush or Ronald Reagan. Clinton was a much better President, and I didn't agree with all of his policy opinions, but he did more than any other President in the modern era to make the federal government more transparent, and for that I think he was a better President than many of his predecessors and successors.
..just wanted to check on those facts you're supposed to bring to this thread that prove Obama is the worst president ever. Any progress?
I just used your post as an example in a Critical Thinking class discussion. 32 out of 32 people voted your post as a failure and a good example of why things read on the internet sould be critically evaluated, something which you have failed to do.
things on the internet need to be taken with a sense of humor, something you and your class failed to do.
<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qymIXlcO3JY?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Humor requires context, so the irony or wit can be differentiated from actual dimwittedness. A short post, of the written word without setup, hyperbolic punctuation or emoticon appears as sincerity. If your posts have been humor instead of servile cut and pastes from prairie-dogging the Koch Brothers you should have let us know.
