He just meant to say that it would've been idea winning this game because the chances that the Pats or the Ravens lose TWO games (including this week) is very slim, which after today's loss is what we are going to need since SOV isn't going to be possible mainly out of our two opponents left, one is Indianapolis. I agree with him.
Yeah I guess I'm just stating the obvious but it would've been ideal if we won since Broncos seem to playing very well against the Patriots right now.
If they lose this weekend and then all teams win out, Texans get the second seed, and the bye. They don't have to lose 2 games.
Yeah. People don't realize that CONFERENCE losses are more crucial, and that tiebreaker superseeds strength of schedule.
I assume you mean if the Bronco's win today and then both the Texans and the Pats finish 12-4 we will get the second seed because our divisional record would be better?
Kate81 coming out from under his bridge wanting to talk **** or what? He had to wait 8 long ass weeks.
I do understand okay but our best chance would obviously have be if we had won and Pats losing which are they are right now, right? That's all I'm saying. The best chance.
Go broncos! And then a weeklong boycott of ESPN...you know theyd be on his nuts 5x stronger if he beats Brady
Is the Texans best chance to win out? Yes obviously because it isn't chance. But if they lose a game, THIS was the game to lose, so they didn't miss any opportunity that is amplified by a pats loss.
Assuming Pats and the Texans tie out while Ravens win out, including today, then we get the 2nd bye. I get what you're saying.
Jeremy Shockey is such an unimportant douche receptacle, crying about some Texans not putting their hands on their chest during the National Anthem.
