I just don't understand the historical reference to nuclear weapons. it doesn't make sense in the context of the thread subject matter. it doesn't bother me one iota, but it is interesting to try and see you wiggle out any reason whatsoever for choosing the "history lesson" of the comparison you made. it's absolutely senseless. and its totally not clever.
christie is fat- he "nuked" obama in his comments, for behaving like an immature little boy. made sense to me- i'm not sure what issue others have with it.
The Fat Man implosion plutonium bomb was newer and considered not to be as reliable as the Little Boy. The advantage was the plutonium fuel it used was cheaper and easier to make in quantity on a tight timetable. The Little Boy was not tested because we could not afford to make two of them.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/17lkdqoLt44" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
