1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[ESPN] Hornets may deal Chris Paul before the season, Rockets in the mix

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Commodore, Dec 5, 2011.

  1. AXG

    AXG Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Messages:
    6,071
    Likes Received:
    938
    I'm all for it. Worse-case scenario he bolts at the end at end of the season but the Rockets shed tons of salary and can finally rebuild. Best-case scenario, he stays and helps bring in another superstar like a Dwight Howard. Either way, it's a better plan than being stuck getting 14th picks every year.
     
  2. larsv8

    larsv8 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    21,663
    Likes Received:
    13,916
    :rolleyes:

    Come on man. This gives us HUGE leverage in the Howard sweepstakes.
     
  3. meh

    meh Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    16,174
    Likes Received:
    3,387
    If Morey does this, I hope he gives back enough salary to still have room to sign Nene. Nene/Scola/CP3/Martin is a team I can see going places. One that may convince Paul to stay. Otherwise, I would just have to hope Morey pulls something out of his hat at the trade deadline. Because I see Paul gone the minute FA starts next year.
     
  4. anchel

    anchel Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2010
    Messages:
    3,913
    Likes Received:
    1,383
    I don't they would be interested in Scola, maybe Patterson.

    I'd say: Lowry of course + Lee + Budinger + 2 picks + Shane TE + Patterson/Williams/Hill. And we're lucky, get Ariza's contract back (seriously, I would not mind very much).
     
  5. Buckcheeks

    Buckcheeks Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    4
    I was somewhat in agreement with your post until you said going from Lowry to Paul might be a step backwards in talent. You're nuts.
     
  6. Houston_Rockets

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Messages:
    809
    Likes Received:
    147
    Don“t know if serious......

    Cause if you think that Lowry alone would do this deal you are completely wrong, specially when there are teams out there throwing Rondo around.

    As for Lowry > CP3 because of how much money each one will make, you can choose between having players that produce more then what they get paid for, or pay for guys that bring Championships, other players, and enthusiasm to the city.

    As much as I love overachieving teams, I prefer the opportunity to be a wining team every single game, while bringing quality basketball by the artists of the game.
     
  7. TheFreak

    TheFreak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,304
    Likes Received:
    3,310
    1) I would rather have Lowry than Paul.

    2) The Rockets were 1st in assists per game in the NBA last year, NOH was 22nd.

    3) The Rockets were 4th in offense last year, NOH was 19th.

    4) I would not pay the max to a distributor who doesn't help make the team better defensively.

    5) I don't really care for a guy who cares the most about having it easy and playing with his buddies in NY, a la LBJ.
     
    5 people like this.
  8. napalm06

    napalm06 Huge Flopping Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    26,923
    Likes Received:
    30,536
    How is the second scenario a win? If that's the case Paul is guaranteed to be a rental and we lost everything.

    Even if I was pro-tanking, I don't think you tank at the expense of the young assets you already have.
     
  9. TheFreak

    TheFreak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,304
    Likes Received:
    3,310
    Not at all. You are not alone. It's ridiculous.
     
  10. Buckcheeks

    Buckcheeks Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    4
    I love Lowry, but you belong in a looney bin.
     
  11. Clutch

    Clutch Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 1999
    Messages:
    22,950
    Likes Received:
    33,697
    You could make an argument for your first sentence... it would be a reason for a team to consider trading a disgruntled, ready-to-leave superstar for a package that includes Lowry.

    The Rockets need what Lowry can't provide -- a magnet. They need a player that will attract other talented players. In this case, you can imagine if they got Paul, they would do everything imaginable trying to get Howard. Their window to get a second player would be small, but by adding a second star, it secures the rationale for both to remain in Houston ... and voila -- Daryl Morey has rebuilt the Rockets on the fly without suffering the losing seasons.

    Easier to talk about than pull off... and it's risky. But then I don't know if losing any one or two players on the team would be catastrophic.
     
    1 person likes this.
  12. mr. 13 in 33

    mr. 13 in 33 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    Messages:
    10,617
    Likes Received:
    636
    why do i have a feeling this is like a trap. Remember when we said we might get melo or bosh:eek:
     
  13. larsv8

    larsv8 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    21,663
    Likes Received:
    13,916
    I don't think Martin would be included in any deal, nor would Lee.

    Thabeet (Filler), Lowry, Morris, Montejounas and both #1s I think is a good starting point.
     
  14. Stack24

    Stack24 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2003
    Messages:
    11,766
    Likes Received:
    1,737
    Paul has been declining in all statistical categories over the past few years. Not worth as much as he was before.
     
  15. BigBenito

    BigBenito Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    7,355
    Likes Received:
    175
    Absolutely /AGREE. Maybe I have too much of a Lowry crush, but I'd definitely take him at under half CP's contract.
     
  16. jaybiddyforeal

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    184
    Likes Received:
    30
    You need more then just a superstar to win. Heat couldnt win because their supporting cast was absolute trash. We cant give away ALL our support to land Paul & Howard. If we do that, we're the Knicks. I'd rather be one piece away (Howard) then be missing an entire bench.

    And the development of Lowry is something to take note of as well. 18/8 were his averages after the Brooks trade. Plus everything else he does to impact a game (reb, stl, 3PT, drawing fouls, leadership, lockdown D, low TO rate). If he does that for an entire season then hes right there with the top 5 PGs in the league. I think banking on Lowrys improvement this year and selling Howard on that is a lot wiser then losing a significant chunk of the team for CP3.

    -James
     
  17. Remix

    Remix Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Messages:
    5,150
    Likes Received:
    3,629
    Agreed, either way we get out of mediocrity.
     
  18. Clutch

    Clutch Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 1999
    Messages:
    22,950
    Likes Received:
    33,697
    It definitely has a deja vu feeling to it. This is identical to what we read <a href="http://bbs.clutchfans.net/showthread.php?t=199389">10+ months ago</a> when Carmelo was on the block.

    Trying to trade for a player who doesn't want to be here and everyone knows wants to be in New York? Yeah, we've been down this road.
     
  19. ascaptjack

    ascaptjack Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2011
    Messages:
    4,690
    Likes Received:
    140
    They'd want Patterson rather than Thabeet.

    You would have to find a backup for Martin and see if Nene or Chandler would sign for far less and remain flexible enough to acquire Howard in FA.
     
  20. KiwiRocket

    KiwiRocket Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    18
    What this guy said!
     

Share This Page