1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Signs that time keeps moving along...

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by xcrunner51, Oct 12, 2011.

  1. xcrunner51

    xcrunner51 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    5,533
    Likes Received:
    2,491
  2. moonsh0t

    moonsh0t Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,530
    Likes Received:
    317
    Yep giving 6 years 100 mil to a 30 year old Carlos Lee wasn't the best move. But he did have the highest WAR of any player on the Astros last year.
     
  3. rpr52121

    rpr52121 Sober Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    7,783
    Likes Received:
    3,266
    The more I think about, Carlos Lee's contract was not so horrible in just the numbers aspect and how he produced. I mean he really had 1 year and 1 month of truly horribly offensive production, but over the other 3 6/7 years, he performed exactly as he was expected to.

    His contract looked worse than it actually was though because:

    1. The Astros have been nothing but horrible since he was signed, making his contract look like the sign post of a badly managed team that was not accepting the signs to rebuild.

    Yes, he is overpaid on the Astros but put him a playoff contending team the past few years like the Padres/Giants/Braves/etc and most likely his stats go up because the team is winning and he better talent around him. If that team were to have gone to the playoffs and win a few series, he would have seemed worth it despite the high price.

    2. The Astros are an NL team. If Lee had been signed to an AL team, his lack of defensive skills would have never mattered. Yes, that off season would have looked bad, but more than not he hit and players have bad seasons. Being unable to hide the defensive holes and lack of range made his 1 year of offensive struggles look even worse than normal, especially to avid Astros fans.

    Don't get me wrong. I would have never signed Carlos Lee to that contract (especially for with the ridiculous trade stipulations on top of it), but more so because I would have never fired Hunsicker and made sure that the farm was stocked with players who could have provided what he did for a lot less money. In the long run, his contract, in a vacuum from the Astros situation, was not that bad.
     
  4. Poloshirtbandit

    Joined:
    May 30, 2003
    Messages:
    5,030
    Likes Received:
    1,105
    White Sox get rid of him in 2004... win WS the next season
    Brewers trade him in 2006... 2007 they have a winning record
    Astros get rid of him... ???
     
  5. bobrek

    bobrek Politics belong in the D & D

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 1999
    Messages:
    36,288
    Likes Received:
    26,645
    Left Rangers after 2006 season, Rangers finish last in 2007.
     
  6. leroy

    leroy Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    27,373
    Likes Received:
    11,249
    Profit?
     
  7. Poloshirtbandit

    Joined:
    May 30, 2003
    Messages:
    5,030
    Likes Received:
    1,105
    he only played half a season with them, doesn't count :p
     
  8. Joshfast

    Joshfast "We're all gonna die" - Billy Sole
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2001
    Messages:
    6,517
    Likes Received:
    2,183
    Just knowing next year is his last is a relief. What a sad couple years for the Astros. :(
     

Share This Page