1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Amazing Photoshop Stuff] "Un"-blurring images

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by DarkHorse, Oct 10, 2011.

  1. DarkHorse

    DarkHorse Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 1999
    Messages:
    6,756
    Likes Received:
    1,303
    This is a sneak preview, so no word on when this will actually appear in a released product. But this is pretty cool stuff. Strait out of CSI. I honestly didn't think this sort of thing was possible.

    <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/xxjiQoTp864" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
  2. Maximus

    Maximus Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    279
    Likes Received:
    17
    Whoa! Steve Jobs lives!!!1 :eek:
     
  3. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,791
    Likes Received:
    41,228
    Had I been there, I would have applauded as well. That was fantastic. I'll be looking for it to come on the market, and I hope the wait isn't terribly long!
     
  4. Thefabman

    Thefabman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,980
    Likes Received:
    1,577
    wow...can't wait for this.
     
  5. B

    B Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2001
    Messages:
    1,901
    Likes Received:
    24
    It was fun to watch the demo in person. Adobe MAX sneaks are usually pretty entertaining. Last year they showed off the content aware fill, which allows you to remove objects or people from photos easily.
     
  6. Coach AI

    Coach AI Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    7,987
    Likes Received:
    844
  7. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    45,954
    Likes Received:
    28,048
    next thing you know they'll be chopping scans of reflections off mirrors.

    darnit rokkit
     
  8. SwoLy-D

    SwoLy-D Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2001
    Messages:
    37,618
    Likes Received:
    1,456
    Meh. I'll praise it when I see it. Right now it's just fluff. I'm not sure this can be done. I'll believe it when I can do it myself. :eek:
     
  9. conquistador#11

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    39,179
    Likes Received:
    28,349
    Angela montenegro has more impressive software. :)
     
  10. The Hunted

    The Hunted Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2007
    Messages:
    2,659
    Likes Received:
    1,663
    That'd what she said.
     
    1 person likes this.
  11. The Hunted

    The Hunted Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2007
    Messages:
    2,659
    Likes Received:
    1,663
  12. vinsensual

    vinsensual Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    8,460
    Likes Received:
    794
    Looks like someone at Adobe was not satisfied with the quality of the leaked Scarlet Johansson pics.
     
  13. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,202
    Likes Received:
    39,702
    Fantastic.

    DD
     
  14. SwoLy-D

    SwoLy-D Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2001
    Messages:
    37,618
    Likes Received:
    1,456
    Don't they mean "SHARPEN" instead of "un-blur"? :grin:
    I was a prey, indeed. :eek: Good one, sir.
     
  15. RoxSqaud

    RoxSqaud Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    9,508
    Likes Received:
    607
    Photoshopped.
     
  16. CrazyDave

    CrazyDave Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,027
    Likes Received:
    439
    now if they could unblur each frame of that video we could see if it was really impressive or not. I'm with Swoly, I will believe in it when I see it, but it isn't that far fetched to imagine them attempting to decipher the movement of a camera during a shot by examining a photo and then using that to restore pixels where they should have been had the camera been still (hard to imagine the details would really be there, but maybe, eh?) . I would suspect it works better on images where the camera was moved, rather than just out of focus. Pretty impressive, but again, believe it when I see it in practice with consistency.
     
  17. SwoLy-D

    SwoLy-D Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2001
    Messages:
    37,618
    Likes Received:
    1,456
    I still say it's mumbo-jumbo. I'd like to see it work on some of the pictures my grandma takes with her fun-saverĀ®. :eek:

    [​IMG]

    or

    EDIT:
    Graphic .gif of shot on JFK (now I realize that was unnecessary :( )
    [​IMG]
    are calling.
     
    #17 SwoLy-D, Oct 11, 2011
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2011
  18. CrazyDave

    CrazyDave Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,027
    Likes Received:
    439
    dude, I didn't need to see that Kennedy clip again blurry (on a loop no less), I sure don't need to see it clarified.

    couldn't find a pic of nessie?
     
  19. RoxSqaud

    RoxSqaud Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    9,508
    Likes Received:
    607
    That's obviously bigfoot.:confused:
     
  20. vinsensual

    vinsensual Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    8,460
    Likes Received:
    794
    <object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KiqkclCJsZs?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KiqkclCJsZs?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
     

Share This Page