1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Official "Should I" Thread

Discussion in 'Fantasy Sports' started by Lil Pun, Sep 2, 2009.

  1. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    37,264
    Likes Received:
    13,730
    Kolb or Stafford
     
  2. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,945
    Likes Received:
    19,854
    You can't sit Stafford until they face a legit defense.

    Week 5 you can start Kolb and sit Stafford.
     
  3. CoolGuy

    CoolGuy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    102
    General question for you guys:

    Does your opponents lineup ever factor into who you start any given week? Shouldn't your lineup be justified by who you think will score the most points regardless of who the other team starts.
     
  4. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,571
    Likes Received:
    7,096
    I would pick up another QB.

    White and Maclin are easy choices. Green and Meachem would be my others.

    Peterson and McCoy are every week plays.
     
  5. Lil Pun

    Lil Pun Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 1999
    Messages:
    34,143
    Likes Received:
    1,038
    Well, the original deal of RECEIVING S. Johnson and D. Branch for L. Blount is on the table still. Johnson's injury troubles me though and the thought of Blount having a huge game too but it may the best I can do.
     
  6. Lil Pun

    Lil Pun Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 1999
    Messages:
    34,143
    Likes Received:
    1,038
    I don't ever use that logic because you can change lineups right before the game. I start whoever has the best matchups in real time.
     
  7. kevC

    kevC Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,394
    Likes Received:
    5,117
    Kellen Winslow vs. Atl or Dustin Keller @ Oak?
     
  8. McNultyisDrunk

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,213
    Likes Received:
    418
    Fred Davis or Jason Witten in WAS @ DAL?
     
  9. BucMan55

    BucMan55 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    4,736
    Likes Received:
    62
    With Kitna starting instead of Romo, Witten will see an uptick.
     
  10. McNultyisDrunk

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,213
    Likes Received:
    418
    Is that official? Haven't seen anything yet about Romo being out.
     
  11. Lil Pun

    Lil Pun Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 1999
    Messages:
    34,143
    Likes Received:
    1,038
    Not official yet.
     
  12. what

    what Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    14,618
    Likes Received:
    2,580
    I do. I mentioned above about how I look at it. If the other team has your qb for one of your good wr it WILL affect your ability to make any headway on him because every time you score, he scores.

    If you don't play that wr and his qb has a big game you help him, but if he doesn't you help yourself. It is risk to play this way though especially if the wr you have is a top wr.

    I would not make a move like this if I had Mike Wallace and my opponent had Big Ben.

    Alternatively, if my opponent had Aaron Rodgers and I had Jordy Nelson. I might play nelson to try and devalue AR. It is a numbers game.
     
  13. kevC

    kevC Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,394
    Likes Received:
    5,117
    Anyone?
     
  14. kaleidosky

    kaleidosky Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,086
    Likes Received:
    1,352
    Keller
     
  15. kaleidosky

    kaleidosky Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,086
    Likes Received:
    1,352
    Witten regardless because of the 2 WR's being out (I think Romo will play)
     
  16. FLASH21

    FLASH21 Heart O' Champs

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Messages:
    13,780
    Likes Received:
    5,719
    Tolbert vs. KC or Bradshaw vs. Philly and why?
     
  17. Lil Pun

    Lil Pun Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 1999
    Messages:
    34,143
    Likes Received:
    1,038
    Bradshaw. The Giants are severely hurting in their passing game, they're built to run and the Eagles are not good at stopping that.
     
    #3517 Lil Pun, Sep 21, 2011
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2011
    1 person likes this.
  18. kaleidosky

    kaleidosky Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,086
    Likes Received:
    1,352
    Tolbert. SD is gonna be way up on KC early and running the rest of the way. With all the running, both backs will get plenty of carries. Plus Tolbert will get goal line. Bradshaw will split time with Jacobs evenly, and they're up against a good D. They'll also probably be down early (seems like Vick will play?) and not running as much

    edit: agree Philly's D isn't great at run-stopping. But if they're down early, I think they'll have to pass more.
     
    1 person likes this.
  19. Lil Pun

    Lil Pun Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 1999
    Messages:
    34,143
    Likes Received:
    1,038
    I accepted this:

    RECEIVE: S. Johnson and D. Branch

    SEND: L. Blount

    I think it's good. Thoughts??
     
  20. what

    what Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    14,618
    Likes Received:
    2,580
    Just wanted to pass on that Tolbert did not practice Wednesday, so keep an eye on this. He is listed as questionable with an undisclosed injury. Tolbert also didn't play well last week when he had his goal line chances.

    On the other hand, I'm not a big Bradshaw fan either, but play him if Tolbert is injured, that's a no-brainer.
     
    1 person likes this.

Share This Page