1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Is the economy doing badly

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by pgabriel, Sep 15, 2011.

  1. Dubious

    Dubious Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,318
    Likes Received:
    5,090
    We might if the global companies paid livable wages, were held accountable for pollution of the world environment, complied with reasonable workplace health and safety laws, were taxed at a rate that supports modern municipal standards and recognized intellectual property rights. Sure we would be all on board with that.
     
  2. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,789
    Likes Received:
    3,708
    i agree, and therefore we have to work with other countries instead of villify them. people call me an obama homer but i am disappointed that some of his trade agreement don't ask countries to raise their standards
     
  3. Air Langhi

    Air Langhi Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2000
    Messages:
    21,943
    Likes Received:
    6,696
    9% unemployment should be unacceptable. If it is the new normal well this country has accepted failure. Why can south korea, taiwan, germany, canada etc do better than us?
     
  4. da_juice

    da_juice Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    1,070
    Reminds me of the Industrial Revolution, where all the older jobs were replaced by technology with no new jobs being invented to replace them. Thus, an imbalance between classes.
     
  5. Rocketman1981

    Rocketman1981 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,499
    Likes Received:
    581
    The irony being forcing their standards to be raised lowers our standards of living.

    Whereas most third world economies spend 70%+ of all income on food and needs, Americans spend less than 15% and a much greater proportion on consumer discretions and luxury goods. We're afforded that because the cost of finished goods, food and all are so low due to cheaper labor abroad. If we force standards abroad, we will have inflated costs on our lives here and therefor lower discretionary spending ourselves.

    Its very American and arrogant to believe we have to force a company in India or China to work to our standards. If people lose their jobs here they have welfare, benefits and a great deal of social services....losing jobs in those countries means you can starve to death.
     
  6. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,789
    Likes Received:
    3,708
    food is actually cheap because we make it cheap. forcing the to raise their standards will actually probably bring some jobs back here and make some of them richer, which is good because they will have more purchasing power.

    we aren't talking just third world countries, china isn't third world
     
  7. YallMean

    YallMean Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Messages:
    14,284
    Likes Received:
    3,815
    That's too extreme. By comparison, the student-teacher, classroom facilities etc of public schools in this country fare much better than other countries of similar size. This means we are investing in schools, but probably not achieving the same goals as other countries. The problems manifested in the education system have to do more than just lack of government spending.
     
  8. pirc1

    pirc1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,137
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    Yes, I don't think other countries spend as much as we do on education, but they are getting much better results. Part of the reason is culture, but there are other reasons as well.
     
  9. Rocketman1981

    Rocketman1981 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,499
    Likes Received:
    581
    Huh?

    Its cheap because of large scale production and technology. Both of which were driven by specialization, which is the focus of globalization.

    Having people regionally do something that is more cost effective elsewhere is a mis-allocation of resources. To have a high GDP/Capita and live the lifestyle we do here means we need innovation to create jobs and a specialized work force, not bring back steel jobs.
     
  10. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    [MadMax's soapbox that no one really cares about and is only semi-related to the topic of the thread]

    so you wanna know what I find deeply offensive and broken about mankind? you don't? too bad, i'm gonna post it anyway:

    that we have this mother friggin miracle of sustenance/food actually growing from the ground and existing organically on land and in the sea...enough to feed the world...yet we limit its production to drive up profit and call it a commodity while parts of the world suffer in starvation.

    bobsled to hell.

    [/MadMax's soapbox that no one really cares about and is only semi-related to the topic of the thread]
     
    1 person likes this.
  11. rhester

    rhester Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2001
    Messages:
    6,600
    Likes Received:
    104
    We need some perspective-

    The U.S. is 25% of the global economy
    Eurozone and Great Britain is 34% of the global economy
    Japan and China have 17%
    Brazil, Italy, Canada, Russia, India, Spain and Australia account for 20% of the global economy

    That leaves 4% for the other 161 countries.

    Take away the high GDP per capita countries like Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Sweden and Switzerland and you have about 157 third world countries that combined make up 0.6% of the global economy.

    There are only 22 countries with a per capita GDP over $20,000 per year
    Of those only Denmark, Ireland, Switzerland, Norway and the U.S. have an average over $30,000

    99 nations have per capita GDP less than $10,000 annually
    41 nations have per captia GDP of less than $2000 annually

    http://earthtrends.wri.org/pdf_library/data_tables/ecn3_2005.pdf

    If you are living in a third world country the answer is probably no.
     
  12. rhester

    rhester Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2001
    Messages:
    6,600
    Likes Received:
    104
    Sorry, didn't see your post, I will kindly yield the soapbox back to you.
     
  13. Rocketman1981

    Rocketman1981 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,499
    Likes Received:
    581
    Then you should be the biggest fan in the world of Wal-mart. Through ultra aggressive cost savings they've lowered the cost of food and goods to all within their reach.

    Ironically, many people blame them for issues when all they are doing is providing extremely low-costs to those with the least amount to spend on goods.

    They push suppliers and manufacturers aggressively to continually push down prices and become more efficient. They also pay over a million employees annually a salary.

    You ask for God, but I give you entrepreneurial spirit as the most powerful moral tool ever in the history of this world.
     
  14. Dubious

    Dubious Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,318
    Likes Received:
    5,090
    You don't have to force them, but if you choose to benefit from the exploitation then you are complicit. ( I say from my $49 Iphone)
     
  15. greenhippos

    greenhippos Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,130
    Likes Received:
    49
    We've got it made in this country. 9% unemployment rate? The unemployment benefits are still more money than billions of people make in a year working 60 hours a week.
     
  16. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    3,605
    Well it depends on what you mean by the "economy is doing fine". What is the point of the economy? Profits for a few or corporations with 15% and growing of those who are increasingly poor? Ok economy for those on top I suppose.

    This is certainly not the type of economy that is the traditional American way.

    If we are talking about automation and therefore not needing so many workers than we need to redistribute money and income to folks who don't work. This is needed for simple morality (sorry libertarians who are outside of normal morality concepts) and "conservatives" who are overly influenced by immoral libertarian concepts.
     
  17. thadeus

    thadeus Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,313
    Likes Received:
    726
    There isn't one economy. There are multiple economies. The one that's advertised on TV is the rich-guy market economy.
     
  18. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    3,605
    America is already for practical purposes the richest nation of the third world (not talking about race or ethnicity) and it will continue the slide downard unless we become more like the Europeans. We had more a safety net and a bit of a welfare state, used to have more of a middle class, but the battle is on to see if we will continue to do so.

    At this point you have the GOP united to gut the safety net and speed up the distribution of wealth upward so we start looking like a banana republic. We have Obama essentially saying he will chip away with the safety net, but slower. Eventually the battle will be enjoined by the non-elite -- hopefully before we have to go through a fascist interlude like Germany needed to do before its present state.
     
  19. Ubiquitin

    Ubiquitin Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2001
    Messages:
    19,567
    Likes Received:
    14,570
    glynch... we are not a third world nation.
     
  20. thadeus

    thadeus Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,313
    Likes Received:
    726
    In some places, and for some people, we are a 3rd world country.
     

Share This Page