could be. i've just been hearing for the last couple of weeks that VATech isn't interested in the SEC...but that SEC is very interested in them.
Man up and make a bet. Lets get a deal done. MWC or any BCS conference you win. otherwise i win, unless Big 12 stays together after TAMU is gone.
man up? yes, if ever there was a way to determine if one is really a man, it's a bet on an internet message board. but yeah, of course that's a deal.
I'm an Aggie fan, I'd be jealous if UT was going to the SEC and they'd be playing the Gators 1.5hrs away while we were playing the... whatever ISU is. Cyclones?
As I've said, this won't end up being just about Baylor http://espn.go.com/college-sports/s...-aggies-accepted-sec-legal-threat-delays-move However, despite the letter, Slive was informed more than once before the SEC vote Tuesday night that "maybe more than one" of the other nine Big 12 members were considering legal options against a possible Texas A&M move, according to a person familiar with the situation. "(The SEC) thought it was clear and free without any possible issues. That is not what happened," said the person, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the private nature of those discussions. The Sept. 2 letter was not intended to waive the rights of individual schools to sue and that decisions like that need approval from various boards of regents and other university overseers, the person said. "That certainly is not going to happen soon. You are not going to get all nine. You might get some," that person told the AP. "Very few, if any, are willing with the uncertainty and instability of the Big 12 at this point to release their claims." In a text message, Texas Tech's Bailey confirmed that the university's board of regents would have to waive the school's right to pursue legal action. He also said Big 12 members were planning a conference call later Wednesday.
Well, figure out what you want to mean by that statement and make Casey an offer he can't refuse. I love me some BBS wagers!
i've figured it out a long time ago and posted it a few times, like when i said i don't feel strongly enough that it's a lock to bet on it. you've even quoted one of those times!
Ok so before a bet was mentioned you said they will be in a 16 team super conference, ACC or Big East. Now you are crawfishing. That is the point of e-penis internet bets. When someone says something that is obviously BS they are called on it and must either double down or back off. After thinking about it, it seems like you have decided to back off.
it's not my fault people here will latch on to one freaking post and ignore numerous other posts that clarify what was implied in the one freaking post they've latched onto.
seems like it's the counter to what was initially being argued...that Baylor was heading to CUSA or WAC.
Dude if you don't really believe it that's fine. The fact is you said in two different posts the option was ACC, Big East or super conference. Changed it after bet was mentioned. I don't go around making bets all the time, this is my first one. So if you don't want in that's fine. Don't worry be happy.
my first post after a bet was mentioned: and then multiple posts after that where i say i don't think it's a lock they land in a bcs conference. it's really not my fault if you and donny can't read.
