I'd prefer Baylor and ISU. Tech would throw off the balance of TX to non-TX schools, and they would also push Tulane into the East division, which would suck. ISU could go into the East and not disturb things as they are. Plus it's already kind of established, either UH or Tech is going to be UT's dingleberry since A&M defected.
This is the only place online I have seen UofH being considered to be UTs dingleberry over Tech. Tech has Kent Hance who has very strong ties to UT.
she's a beast, might be the best thing to happen to UH ever. she infiltrated the politician good ole boy network already so no worries.
let's just go tip jar/sig bet. i don't think there's anyway they end up in conf. usa (or wac, lol), but i'm not sure where they'll end up other than that. if they end up in conf. usa/wac, i'll donate $50 to tip jar, if they end up in another conf., you do the same. or you can update your sig to say "water conservation sucks and groogrux is terribly smart" or some such nonsense.
It is funny how good someone looks when they get the job and are actually willing to work. Same goes for the AD.
Shouldn't the bet be: BCS conf. = Groogly win non-BCS conf. = Casey wins ? *wager has no action if Baylor does not change conferences
no because i never said they were a lock to be in a bcs conference. my guess is they will, but i've never said i was willing to bet on that.
Didn't UVA lobby hard to add VaTech to the ACC a few years ago? That may be why there is no interest in the SEC.
