I'd be down for that. I think having no trades would be best. It takes away all the chaos and makes it 100% skill in drafting.
I think there should be trading, BUT limit each team to a maximum of 3 trades. It's not as fun without being able to plan how to snatch away another team's star player.
I have 2K11 I can download some updated roster with the rookies and we can agree upon what there stats should be.....there are some nice 2k share rosters out there. I just dont know how to do the videos from the computer perspective.
I think it also makes teams that drafted bad try and re compensate by making a blockbuster trade. Where as teams like mine, I take alot of time before my pick looking at stats and what guys fit my team best. Limiting trades is much better IMO
They should be in the low 70s max. Like Derrick Williams 71 Kyrie Irving 72. Derrick williams: Inside B Outside C- etc.
If a guy doesnt fall to you yes you should be able to trade for him but greenhippos wanted to trade like a million times lol
If you have constant access to your email I can let you know if you have trade offers or when its almost your pick. Oh yeah, and no rookies please. That's a huge argument waiting to happen.
A redraft would move faster, but less players will fall through the cracks, making it even harder to be competitive. I like it.
I don't know how to do it but I'm sure you could Google it and find out. I'll make the thread either when we get 16 or when voting is done on the current draft. It's up to yall.