94 by a nose. 88 was more positive and conscious. 94 started too much of the crime syndicate mafioso dreams that got played out. I think 94 was more national and polished, 88 still was too regional. If youre an east coast guy youll probaby go 88
'88 and here's another reason for that year, <img src="http://www.rontronik.com/blog/albumcovers/icet-power-front.jpg">
<iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Q5nk_J-SQ_4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <iframe width="560" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nRNBY4BvylU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> Boot Camp.
Agreed... I was gonna go with either '94 or '88, but the Nicki Minaj nip slip definitely but 2011 over everything
The question is which year is more *important*, which I think might be a mistake on the part of the OP (as in, not his intent), because when it comes to importance in discussions of chronology, what came before is always technically more important what came afterwards. After all, it's the cause, it's the reason. If the discussion is about what year is *better*, that would probably yield more of a debate. It seems like that's what you guys are doing anyway, though.