I think you need to more precisely define liking it. I don't think a biological response would be considered consent, I also wonder if a woman's purporting to like it would be construed as a survival tactic.
If the roles were reversed and a woman sexually assaulted a boy or a young man, would the lawyer use his sexual arousal as a defense to the act? Hmm!
I wonder if one would need to demonstrate some kind of physical or psychological duress to the male. Knife, gunpoint or handcuffs for the former, mental illness or handicap of some kind for the latter.
That is scary. I would think that rape is sex without consent and the effects of it are irrelevant but who knows when you get a jury in a room.
How could the woman not be sexually aroused at some point? It's nearly unavoidable during simple intercourse (forced or not). Trust me, I've read James Patterson books.
Yeah, like that one grand jury in Austin that refused to indict the rapist because the lady gave him a condom to wear (for protection against AIDS). They considered it consent since she gave it to him.
Yeah, that was a while back. Fortunately a second grand jury was convened and they were a little smarter. But that just goes to show you that a 12-person jury of your peers is not always necessarily your mental peers. Dumbasses anound in America.
Yes, she gives her full consent later on. And the person who reports it isn't her but another party like her father.
Under CA law, rape occurs when: An individual engages in sexual intercourse with another person when the sexual act is accomplished (1) against that person's will, or (2) without that person’s consent and by means of force. So yes, if you ambush a woman and have your way with her, you have engaged in sexual intercourse with the woman and at the time of the sexual act, it was against that woman's will or without that person's consent and by means of force. Not search about TX, but under CA, you would be guilty under both prongs (against will and without consent + use of force). You can argue that she later consented, but the argument is rather weak because the consent was lacking at the time of the sexual act (e.g., the time you began the act). DISCLAIMER: This is not legal advice. I am not your lawyer. Please seek a lawyer in your jurisdiction for more specific analysis of your jurisdiction's law. Spoiler Better yet, go to the nearest police station and turn yourself in ASAP! :grin:
