The most we'd probably get as far as the "big four" goes would be Delgado (who probably would just come with a throw in player). What's more realistic is getting a Carlos Perez/JJ Hoover and Salcedo/Pastornicky and Oberholtzer/Clemens. Any one of those combinations would we a decent return on Bourn.
Worst case scenrio in a Bourn to ATL trade is Hoover/Pastornicky...good #3 or #4 or dominant closer type and everyday SS. That said, i'd be disappointed in that.
Rosenthal: Rival exec: Braves have 6 untouchables, not previously reported 4. Will make deal for Bourn tough. (paraphrasing that).
saying you have untouchables mean nothing... hunterpence has been RE-touchable like 28 times in the last week..
What do you guys think about Drew Storen? Young closer seems to have a good arm. If the Nationals are interested in Bourn, should we work a deal around Storen?
Some no-name on Twitter claims that Bourn for Storen is "probable" now. http://twitter.com/#!/PGSportsCT I doubt it's true, and I don't think I'd be on board, though I know little about Storen.
If the idea is to start bringing potential stars up around 2014 based on the Pence trade, I don't see the purpose of getting Storen. They already have Melancon, so closer is not a priority on the MLB club. And Storen will be approaching free agency when the team is ready to contend anyway. Why trade for an 8th inning reliever for a team that sucks?
I like it but need another prospect in the deal and Ian Desmond won't due. Storen is going to be a premier closer for a LONG time, although another reliever wouldn't go over well without a good prospect.
Great - you're adding an ace closer to a team that doesn't win any games anyway. And by the time they do, he'll be approaching free agency where he'll get overpaid as a closer. Again, what's the point?