1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Obama to Cave to GOP and Cut Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by glynch, Jul 7, 2011.

  1. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,914
    Likes Received:
    41,461
    Putting aside the silliness of pretending like the gov't is a household, the Republican way to "make more money" is to cap your level of income permanently at a minimum, and cut it further if at all possible. THat makes tons and tons of sense. If you're an idiot.
     
  2. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,804
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    unbelievable and sad
     
  3. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,804
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    so first of all two years is that much of a no-no for you. secondly, at what point do you think changes should be made. how long do you think people should be able to live on social security?

    its kind of a double edged sword, we want to keep the medicare benefits, people live longer, but we can't pay for it. at some point ss has to be pulled back i think. for people who physically can't work, i think there are other benefits to help them.
     
  4. B-Bob

    B-Bob "94-year-old self-described dreamer"
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    35,986
    Likes Received:
    36,841
    I hope you're all studying 1895. The Grand Old Strategy is working perfectly, from 1980 to 2012, and the only part missing will be child labor (I think.)
     
  5. Raven

    Raven Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,984
    Likes Received:
    1,025
    Obama simply has no stomach for fighting, and the GOP is walking all over him.

    :(
     
  6. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,685
    Likes Received:
    16,213
    Is this why both Boehner and McConnell are now proposing to just give Obama unilateral authority to raise the debt ceiling with ZERO spending cuts? That's *exactly* what Dems wanted in the first place when this all started months ago.

    http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/...ork-on-debt-ceiling-backup-plan.php?ref=fpblg
     
  7. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,093
    Likes Received:
    3,605
    1) Social security is not in trouble for many years. The mutual funds and the consrvative haters of the program compeltely exagerate its problems.

    ***********
    http://www.moneynews.com/StreetTalk/Economist-Dean-Baker-Social/2011/07/05/id/402556

    Economist Dean Baker says the much-publicized fears about Social Security are nothing more than political posturing.

    "While you can sound really smart in Washington by saying that Social Security is going bankrupt, the facts say the opposite," Baker writes in the Des Moines Register.

    "According to the Social Security trustees' report, if we did absolutely nothing the program could pay every penny of scheduled benefits through the year 2036."

    According to Baker, there’s a lot of other nonsense being circulated about Social Security.

    “Many opponents of Social Security insist that its $2.6 trillion trust fund does not exist or that it is ‘just sheets of paper,’" says Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

    “The trust fund is held in the form of U.S. government bonds, which are indeed sheets of paper. However, investors everywhere eagerly seek out these 'sheets of paper' as the safest asset in the world."

    Even if no changes were made to Social Security, the trust fund could always pay close to 80 percent of scheduled benefits, says Baker, and while it would be unacceptable to pay people a smaller benefit than had been promised, the scheduled benefits for new retirees are projected to rise by 1 percent a year in excess of prices.

    Read more: Economist Dean Baker: Social Security ‘Problem’ Doesn't Exist
    Important: Can you afford to Retire? Shocking Poll Results
    ************

    2) Folks need health care. Medicare for all is what we need. The last thing we need is to throw off millions of old people between 65 to 67 onto the rolls of the uninsured. From previous posts I don't think you are a rabid conservative or libertarian, so try to divorce yourself from knee jerk defense of Obama and think about the issue.
     
  8. Dubious

    Dubious Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,318
    Likes Received:
    5,090
  9. SacTown

    SacTown Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,590
    Likes Received:
    235
    WOW. Please read Deckard's response a few times until you understand the concept of what is really going on here. You are out there in la la land with this post bro.
     
  10. SacTown

    SacTown Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,590
    Likes Received:
    235
    Too much fox news has gotten to him. :(
     
  11. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,859
    Likes Received:
    12,450
    Dead on! Life expectancy continues to rise and the Medicare age should gradually increase from 65 to 67. Drawing a line in the sand about this is no different than insisting that any tax increase is a non-starter.

    Politicians need to come out of their foxholes and make a deal.
     
  12. babyicedog

    babyicedog Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2010
    Messages:
    750
    Likes Received:
    88
    It's on!!

    http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/07/13/debt.talks/index.html

    Washington (CNN) -- A fourth straight day of negotiations intended to head off a possible government default ended on a tense note Wednesday, with House Majority Leader Eric Cantor and President Barack Obama squaring off over the Republican's call for a short-term extension of the federal debt ceiling.

    At one point, Obama said the political wrangling confirmed what the public considers to be the worst of Washington, according to Democratic sources familiar with the talks who spoke on condition of not being identified.

    Multiple sources, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said Obama told the gathering that "this could bring my presidency down," referring to his pledge to veto any short-term extension of the debt ceiling. Sources say he vowed, "I will not yield on this."

    The exchange concluded almost two hours of talks that failed to achieve a breakthrough. Another session -- the fifth in five days -- was set for Thursday, participants said.

    Administration officials have warned that a failure to raise the current $14.3 trillion debt ceiling by August 2 could trigger a partial default. If Washington lacks the money to pay its bills, interest rates could skyrocket and the value of the dollar could decline, among other things.

    The seriousness of the situation was reinforced when a major rating agency said Wednesday it would put the sterling bond rating of the United States on review for possible downgrade.

    Moody's Investors Services said it had initiated the review because of "the rising possibility" that Congress will fail to raise the debt ceiling in time -- something that could lead to a U.S. default on its debt.


    Cantor, R-Virginia, told reporters after Wednesday's meeting that he proposed a short-term agreement to raise the federal debt ceiling, a position Obama has previously rejected.

    "That's when he got very agitated and said I've sat here long enough -- that no other president -- Ronald Reagan -- would sit here like this -- and that he's reached the point that something's gotta give," Cantor said, adding that Obama called for Republicans to compromise on either their insistence that a debt-ceiling hike must be matched dollar-for-dollar by spending cuts or on their opposition to any kind of tax increase.

    "And he said to me, 'Eric, don't call my bluff.' He said 'I'm going to the American people with this,' " Cantor quoted Obama as saying.

    "I was somewhat taken aback," Cantor said. When he continued to press the issue, Cantor said, Obama "shoved back from the table, said 'I'll see you tomorrow' and walked out."

    The Democratic sources provided a different take on the exchange, saying Obama cut off Cantor at the end after the Virginia Republican changed from a previously held position against a short-term extension of the debt ceiling.

    Obama responded that he'd veto such a temporary measure, according to the sources, then went on to say that what was happening in the negotiations confirmed the worst of what the American people think about Washington.

    According to the sources, Obama expressed frustration with the unwillingness of congressional Republicans to compromise and called on them to stop posturing and catering to their bases. He then ended the meeting, the Democratic sources said.

    Obama has insisted on one deal that will raise the amount of money the government can borrow to sufficient levels to last through 2012 -- after his campaign for re-election. Cantor's call for a short-term agreement also could win the support of House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, an aide to Boehner said.

    Democrats and Republicans remain at sharp odds over how to proceed. Obama has indicated a preference for a "grand bargain" that would save up to $4 trillion over the next decade through a combination of spending cuts, raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans and reforming politically popular entitlement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid.

    GOP leaders remain adamantly opposed to any tax hikes, arguing that increasing the burden on "job creators" now would derail what has already proven to be, at best, a shaky economic recovery.

    On Tuesday, Obama said he cannot guarantee that older Americans will receive their Social Security checks next month if a deal is not reached.

    "There may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it," the president told CBS News.

    Testifying Wednesday on Capitol Hill, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke warned that failure to raise the ceiling would create a "major crisis" and be potentially "catastrophic" for the global economy.

    Republicans accused the White House of fear-mongering and failing to negotiate in good faith. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, said Wednesday morning that the administration is pushing for tax hikes now in exchange for illusory spending cuts later.

    Specifically, McConnell claimed an administration official had only been able to identify $2 billion in spending reductions when asked what cuts the White House would agree to next year -- a tiny fraction of roughly $4 trillion in deficit reduction savings Obama has claimed he's interested in generating over the next decade.

    "Republicans refuse to be drawn into this legislative trap," McConnell said, adding that the White House is "not serious about cutting spending or debt."

    White House Press Secretary Jay Carney dismissed McConnell's complaint, calling it inaccurate and asserting that the president is willing to make deep spending cuts.

    On Tuesday, McConnell unveiled what he characterized as a last-ditch plan to avert a default if negotiators can't reach an agreement. The Republican leader proposed three short-term increases in the amount the government can borrow while at the same time registering the disapproval of Congress for such a move.

    McConnell's proposal would give Obama power to raise the debt ceiling by a total of $2.5 trillion, but also would require three congressional votes on the issue before the 2012 general election. The president would be required to identify spending cuts equivalent to each debt ceiling increase, though there would be no guarantee Congress would adopt the proposed cuts.

    While some congressional Democrats promised to consider the plan, Obama has made clear his opposition to any short-term extension of the debt ceiling.

    However, Cantor's statement Wednesday that no viable proposals have emerged was intended to show the McConnell plan had no chance of winning approval from the House, Republican congressional sources said.

    Some conservatives are accusing McConnell of capitulating to the Democrats. The website redstate.com posted a story Tuesday with the headline: "Mitch McConnell Just Proposed the 'Pontius Pilate Pass the Buck Act of 2011.' "

    In an interview Wednesday with Mandy Connell of WHAS radio, McConnell said his proposal was necessary because an acceptable deficit reduction deal was proving unattainable and the United States must avoid a default that would be "bad for Republicans."

    "Given a choice between a bad deal and avoiding default, I choose to avoid default," McConnell said, adding that "if we were to go into default ... the practical effect of that will be to allow the president to make us co-owners of a bad economy."

    He also said defaulting is "completely and totally unacceptable, and it's not going to happen."

    After Wednesday's meeting, Cantor told reporters that "no one wants to rattle the markets."

    Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minnesota, unveiled an alternative fallback plan Wednesday, introducing legislation designed to ensure members of the military and holders of U.S. debt are paid in the event the debt ceiling isn't raised. Bachmann, a conservative tea party favorite and 2012 presidential contender, accused Obama of "holding the full faith and credit of the United States hostage so that he can continue his spending spree."

    In response, Carney told reporters that Bachmann's proposal amounts to accepting a U.S. default on its obligations, rather than offering a serious effort to prevent it from happening.

    "That's not a Plan B. That's not a solution," Carney said.

    For now, it remains unclear at best whether the two sides will be able to reach any agreement. Cantor said that during Tuesday's negotiating session at the White House, Obama presented more details of his proposed cuts to entitlement programs. Republicans, according to Cantor, supported much of what they heard.

    On Wednesday, Cantor reiterated GOP opposition to higher taxes and called on Obama to make public the details of what he is proposing in the negotiations "so that both Republicans and Democrats can make well-informed decisions about something of this magnitude."

    Asked about going public with details of entitlement reforms being discussed, Carney told reporters that would run counter to the negotiating process and the principle that "nothing is agreed to until everything is agreed to."

    At the heart of the Republican resistance is a bedrock principle pushed by conservative crusader Grover Norquist against any kind of tax increase. A pledge pushed by Norquist's group, Americans for Tax Reform, has been signed by more than 230 House members and 40 senators, almost all of them Republicans.

    However, a letter to Obama and legislators Tuesday from leading business figures and associations urged them to put aside hard-line partisan positions in order to reach a deal.

    "Our political leaders must agree to a plan to substantially reduce our long-term budget deficits with a goal of at least stabilizing our nation's debt as a percentage of GDP (gross domestic product) -- which will entail difficult choices," said the letter from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and others known for traditionally supporting Republicans.

    "Now is the time for our political leaders to put aside partisan differences and act in the nation's best interests," the letter concluded. "We believe that our nation's economic future is reliant upon their actions and urge them to reach an agreement. It is time to pull together rather than pull apart."

    At the heart of Obama's call for more tax revenue would be allowing tax cuts from the Bush presidency to expire at the end of 2012 for families making more than $250,000. His plan would keep the lower tax rates for Americans who earn less.

    Obama noted earlier this week he is not looking to raise any taxes until 2013 or later. He claimed he has "bent over backward to work with the Republicans" and not force them to vote on any revenue hikes in the short term -- a politically toxic move for the GOP's conservative base.

    In exchange, Obama said, he wants to ensure that the current progressive nature of the tax code is maintained, with higher-income Americans assessed higher tax rates.

    For his part, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner warned that time is running out. The secretary said he wants to see a deal to raise the debt limit and cut projected spending by the end of this week -- or next week at the latest -- so that Congress will have enough time to turn the deal into law.
     
  13. tallanvor

    tallanvor Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    18,736
    Likes Received:
    11,865
  14. CCorn

    CCorn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2010
    Messages:
    22,318
    Likes Received:
    23,127
    [​IMG]

    About time.
     
    1 person likes this.
  15. Batman Jones

    Batman Jones Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 1999
    Messages:
    15,937
    Likes Received:
    5,491
    Repped like a mother****er.

    Give 'em hell, Barry.
     
  16. Fatty FatBastard

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2001
    Messages:
    15,916
    Likes Received:
    159
    Go look at tax rates back before WWII, Einstein.

    You are so oblivious to economics it amuses me.
     
  17. Kojirou

    Kojirou Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    6,180
    Likes Received:
    281
    People like you who act like taxes are the end-all be-all of economic policy are the ones who amuse me. Not to mention, what does tax rates from 70+ years ago have to do with anything? If you have a point, state it and don't tell me to do my own research.
     
  18. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    This is just flat out ridiculous of the republicans. I'm looking for something to be annoyed at Obama for, but I don't see it. He's given them everything they want, now they need to give him something he wants.

    How's this so hard to understand?
     
  19. pirc1

    pirc1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,138
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    Sounds like if we just have 0 tax and dissolve the USA it would be a perfect world for the Republicans.
     
  20. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,914
    Likes Received:
    41,461
    And what, precious child, is the lesson of the Great Depression you want to teach me? Enlighten! ;)
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now