1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Realignment] Astros to the AL?

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by Preston27, Jun 11, 2011.

  1. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,527
    Likes Received:
    5,528
    You realize the "history" this team has with the Cards and Cubs is less than 20 years old and that it's mostly been a non-rivalry for the majority of those years? I mean, does anyone have any lingering hate for the Cards prior to 2004? And they have no rivarly with the Mets, other than a 25-year old playoff series.

    The Braves are really the one constant - we shared a division with them and then after that, met them in the playoffs often - but even that doesn't have more than 15 years to it, really, because the teams weren't good together until, really, '99.

    There are legitimate reasons to not move, I guess - I just don't think inflating these rivalries is one. Trust me, we would learn to hate the Angels, Rangers, et al, in due time.

    Whoa, whoa.... Let's not compare Astros/Cards to Cowboys/Eagles/Giants/Redskins. Different zip codes.
     
  2. rrj_gamz

    rrj_gamz Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    15,595
    Likes Received:
    198
    Definitley different zip codes, but my point is rivalry was why they stayed put...

    Given the majority of my memories are within that 20 year period, my rivalry argument stands...and yes, hating the Cards and Cubs will never get old...Can I hate other teams, sure, but it just ain't right
     
  3. msn

    msn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    11,726
    Likes Received:
    2,094
    Doesn't have to be a rivalry to be legit history. Nor do the teams have to be "good". Hell, all those lean years in the '70s and '80s made '80, '81, '86, and the late '90s that much sweeter.

    Let me tell you, I hated the Braves and Cardinals in the early '80s. And the Dodgers--especially the Dodgers. I hated the Mets as soon as Ray Knight went up there, and especially after freaking '86 and Fred Brocklander.

    This is an NL town, and it should remain an NL town.
     
  4. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,606
    Likes Received:
    7,136
    More like 1994.
     
  5. Joshfast

    Joshfast "We're all gonna die" - Billy Sole
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2001
    Messages:
    6,516
    Likes Received:
    2,182
    DH rule sucks. N.L. all the way.
     
  6. Smokey

    Smokey Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 1999
    Messages:
    13,333
    Likes Received:
    722
    Bring back the Montreal Expos too.

    I miss that roof that looked like a tarp.
     
  7. mugrakers

    mugrakers Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,074
    Likes Received:
    218
    The NL is the minor league to the AL. Don't be afraid to play with the big boys.
     
  8. RocketMania1991

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,996
    Likes Received:
    124
    Thats why the NL is sitting with the reigning champs.
     
  9. msn

    msn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    11,726
    Likes Received:
    2,094
    afraid? pshhh. no "fear" here, just a general disdain for the AL altogether, *especially* the "DH" bullcrap. when the Astros suck, they'll suck in either league. and when they're good again, they'll be good in either league.

    but I'll take the senior circuit and *real* baseball, tyvm.
     
  10. Major Malcontent

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2000
    Messages:
    3,177
    Likes Received:
    211
    Only thing I am afraid of is having to watch 4 hour snoozefests where five guys on the team try to work walks and four try to club 3 run home runs.

    The NL is real baseball with rules and strategies that have stood the test of time since the late 1800's not 1973.

    Don't be afraid to not be brainwashed by ESPN's "Only the Yankees and BoSox matter" creed.
     
    1 person likes this.
  11. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,527
    Likes Received:
    5,528
    If you're not good, you have no rivalries. Sorry - that's kind of a rule.

    You hated the Braves, who were a non-factor in baseball during those years? And yeah, everyone hated the Cards and Dodgers and Mets - because they won. Do you think Dodger fans hated the Astros? No way.

    And would you not instantly hate the Sox? The Yankees? The Rangers and their bandwagon fans? You'd find teams to hate pretty easily, regardless of league.

    Look, I respect where you're coming from - but I think you need a little perspective. There's not a storied legacy here; there just isn't. The Astros are about as milquetoast a franchise as there is. They obviously had an uptick with Bagwell and Biggio - but we're talking about roughly 10 great years out of very nearly 50. Among their top three accomplishments as a franchise is their 1970s rainbow jerseys. I mean...

    I think maybe fear of change and moving on is making a few too many of you misty-eyed and nostalgic about a history that doesn't really exist. Do you think *any* MLB fan outside of Houston hears the Astros and thinks, "Now *that's an NL town!"? Of course not.

    This team is terrible. It's been terrible for years and will likely be terrible for several more. I'm warming up to the idea of *something* exciting happening, even if its just changing leagues.
     
  12. mugrakers

    mugrakers Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,074
    Likes Received:
    218
    I'm sorry but AL baseball is a lot more exciting than watching pitchers go up there and whiff 4 times in a row and go back to sit down. Killing a rally. Yea thats so much fun.
     
  13. DreamRoxCoogFan

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    3,661
    Likes Received:
    175
    yeah I guess I'm in the minority here, but I wouldn't mind being in the AL. We don't have a legitimate rivalry with anyone and it would be nice to have guaranteed sellouts with big teams coming through. I'm definitely not nearly as passionate about the DH as some people are on here- I'm a causal baseball fan.

    One real downsides I see are 1- playing west coast teams will be screwy with time zones 2- having to compete with the big spenders to be competitive, but even that isn't completely true. If you build a team the right way, it's very possible to be a competitor.
     
  14. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,606
    Likes Received:
    7,136
    50 years of history is nothing to sneeze at. Move the Rockies/Diamondbacks.
     
  15. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    The Cubs and Cards have had a rivarly for years...the Cubs have rarely been good.

    The Red Sox and Yankees have had a one-sided rivalry until recently. But it's been a rivalry nonetheless.


    Do you think I care what they think? I KNOW Houston is an NL town because I've lived here my entire life with an NL team, no matter what someone somewhere else thinks about it.

    The Astros are looking at 50 years of National League play. That's not nothing. You may not care about that, and that's your view...but clearly there a quite a few of us who do.
     
  16. djohn2o12

    djohn2o12 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,043
    Likes Received:
    35
    If the diamondbacks move, then we will replace them in the NL West
     
  17. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,606
    Likes Received:
    7,136
    That is just a return for us, and keeps us in the NL. If they want Texas and the Astros to be in the same division, move us both to the NL West, and put the Rockies & Diamondbacks in the AL. However, I'd prefer they stay in the AL.
     
  18. msn

    msn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    11,726
    Likes Received:
    2,094
    The quote was "It doesn't have to be a rivalry to be legit history." So, regardless of your invalid "rule" and regardless of whether you or anyone else considers the Astros to have had "rivalries", our history is legit.

    You can compare our franchise's history to that of century+ old storied franchises or to that of franchises who have actually *won* something (...anything...) and call it "milquetoast" all you like, but it's still our history. This town. Say "Spec Richardson" to a Houstonian and he throws up in his mouth. Say "Spec Richardson" to a guy in Philly and he's like, "wha?"

    Yes. Because we played them 18 times a year. And because we didn't win in Atlanta a lot. And because the 6:30 start time meant I could see more of the game and become more familiar with them. "Hate" doesn't always have to be about championship-penis envy, Ric.

    No, actually. Not "instantly". I didn't spend 40 years watching my team face those guys year-in and year-out. And truth be told, I've never had much of a problem with the Yankees. Who freaking cares? It's junior circuit ball, for crying out loud.

    Let me give you some perspective, from a guy who read baseball history books all of his childhood and memorized stats from players who were dead and who lived and breathed Astros baseball for several decades: I don't give a rat's ass how the Astros' history stacks up against that of other towns. This is our town and our history, short and uneventful as it might be in your eyes. Of course I don't expect you or anyone else to have the same nostalgia or emotional connection to the team and its NL roots, but this is a discussion forum and we'll all say what we think, and I think there may be others who feel the way I do.

    Wait I minute, I thought you "respect where I'm coming from?" This "fear of change" bullcrap is as condescending as it is inaccurate. Just because you don't agree or don't see it the same way, don't start assuming others suffer from sort of emotional or intellectual lack. And by the way, the history *does* exist, whether you want to belittle it or not. '86 was one of the greatest LCS ever. '80 was outstanding, too. Ryan pitched here. Eddie Matthews hit his 500th here. Watson scored the millionth run in MLB history. JR Richard made the Dodgers pee their pants. Ken Johnson pitched a no-hitter and lost the game. Don Wilson's 2nd no-hitter came against the Reds a day after they no-hit us. It "exists", all right. And I'm well aware that changing leagues won't take it away--but it will mean even *fewer* games against the teams we've made our history playing against. And that sucks. (And, btw, AL ball sucks, too.)

    Do you think I care? Do you really think that matters?

    Bully for you. For me, AL "baseball" is boring as hell.
     
    2 people like this.
  19. juicystream

    juicystream Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2001
    Messages:
    30,606
    Likes Received:
    7,136
    [rquoter]Under the possible plan, the leagues would not be split into divisions. The top three teams would make the playoffs. The fourth- and fifth-place clubs would be wild cards and play for one spot.[/rquoter]

    http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=6659129
     
  20. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    so the whole AL West/NL West discussion is moot in that case.

    if the D-Backs or Marlins move to the AL...doesn't matter....they're not going to be in a geographically aligned division, anyway.
     

Share This Page