So your first reason is irrelavent. And your second reason is saying that since it's not as clear-cut, she deserves less of a punishment if she's found guilty?
First reason is relevant as it's not an option. No, she doesn't deserve less of a punishment as she was convicted of the crime. I was just stating that it isn't as clear cut as this situation. It doesn't seem like any state does, however, that doesn't mean that isn't what I believe should happen. This. If they convict someone of a crime and the maximum punishment is the death penalty, then I see no reason why it shouldn't be used.
well here's a twist to this story that will get people riled up. note before commenting, there is no info in this article about whether this lady is a citizen.
