Lol. Resist, yet you respond with petty insults. The woman at the 42 second mark acts similarly to the last lady. She even has an expression that seems like "oh **** I got caught". AND she runs away. Was she stealing or was she doing a good deed because you all definitely know the intentions of everybody in the video. What was hers?
Don't get mad because I hooked you with your own bait. You got nothing. I smell ish and it's coming from you.
You asked a question you already knew the answer to. I didn't take the bait. Instead I made you result to childish name calling.
The same usual suspects in this thread who are taking the same old position they do in every race based threads. My two cents: It's impossible to tell the initial intentions of the lady, anyone saying otherwise has probably pre-existing racial issues or isn't able to comprehend the different possible outcomes. Either way you've got to be an idiot to make some sort of a conclusion based on the information available. The decision to actually take the bag from the guy playing the joke was wrong. If she thought he was placing people in danger then she should have called the police. I'm sure they would not have found it all that funny as he's possibly putting people in unnecessary danger.
1) If said race is in the wrong in those threads then people must be racist if they go against them? don't make yourself look like fools and people wont judge you. 2)Are these people serious when they say it is impossible to tell the intention of that woman? I have a hard time believing this. As some else already mentioned, she disregarded traffics and ran in the rain, you think she her intention was to see who the purse belong to and return it?
You appear to have made your own conclusions, I just pointed out an observation about certain posters and their tendencies. LOL, very logical, "she disregarded traffics and ran in the rain" therefore thief!!! If this is the only scenario you can come up with, then you are either blinded by her skin color or are just plain thick in the head.
Maybe you are different but I wouldn't jump out of my car in the rain, run across the street infront of a car (while smiling the whole time), just so I can pick up a wet purse laying on the street and return it to the owner. Oh and that woman was wearing heels too (I haven't met a woman who liked running in heels). Just doesn't add up. Use simple reasoning instead of coming up with conspiracy theories, etc. Yet, you keep bringing up skin color. Seriously you've got issues.
Again, why is everybody else given the benefit of the doubt EXCEPT her? I even pointed out a woman who did pretty much the same thing as her yet she was supposedly doing the right thing in most people's eyes. I'm not going to say it's about race but of you all are so sure she was stealing while everybody else had good intentions then it should be easy to explain why this woman is a thief but the woman who does pretty much the same thing isn't.
I haven't seen anybody say that. Also, you're wondering why everybody is only targeting the woman who is the central focus of the entire thread's discussion? Really? The one that blew a f***ing gasket and whose boyfriend went all 'roadhouse' on the prankster? Really? You don't get why people are giving *that* particular lady a hard time?
Now we're saying it's the heels that give the thievery away. Lol!!! Smiling and heels equals thief. Several people got out their cars, several people went out in traffic, I even pointed out one woman who did pretty much the same thing, there was one guy who even kept chasing after it was pulled away but because this woman was wearing heels she was a thief but everybody else was going to do the right thing. Got it!
Read my other posts, I've already stated that her second reaction was ignorant and childish. I don't see a problem focusing and berating the woman and man for that, which is what the OP asked about in the first post. I just don't see how her first reaction, which everybody is focusing on, can absolutely, positively point out that she was attempting to steal.
No, I've stated before that I think he was guilty and it was a shame he got off but that's the way the justice system works. Money trumps all.
Because she came back, drove over the string, took the purse, refused to give it back to the rightful owner, screamed, threatened, and drove away with the purse. Nobody did that EXCEPT her .
Again, that is not what people are referring to. If you want to says she is stealing based on the second reaction fine, there is some factual evidence there although it was more than likely for simple vengeance and not personal gain but still it was dumb and wrong.
Should it? Does that make it OK? I mean it seems as if her last reaction was for vengeance not personal gain. Does that make it OK to accuse her of stealing the first time around because you don't like her second reaction?
It's only logical. If she wants to steal it the second time around, why would that not have been her intention the first time as well? Why are you so adamantly defending her? She definitely wanted to steal it. Whether she already wanted to steal it the first time around, who knows? All we know is that she is the only one (at least the only one we were shown in the video) who went the extra mile to steal it.
