1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Can we finally put to rest that the Gasol/Brown trade was 1 sided

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by GreatOne1978, Apr 30, 2011.

  1. BleedRocketsRed

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    7,094
    Likes Received:
    611
    Perhaps I should have said "looking like they would be constantly in the lottery." That is what I meant. They hadn't made the postseason in a couple of years and was one of the worst teams in the league at the time of the deal.

    You are right about the deal being made after losing Bynum. Still don't see how that makes them a "borderline playoff" team. Still disagree that the deal "turned a borderline playoff team into a dynasty," more like made a really good team even better.
     
  2. npz

    npz Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2010
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    7
    He got eliminated by the Pau Lakers the first year out, as well.

    Now he's gonna say it was a good deal for Memphis in order to rationalize how he just got beat by the 8th seed in convincing fashion.
     
  3. ICanDunkOnYao

    ICanDunkOnYao Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    Messages:
    1,005
    Likes Received:
    38
  4. BleedRocketsRed

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    7,094
    Likes Received:
    611
    I guess you and I have completely different ideas of how a rebuilding team should draft. My personal opinion is best player available and try to stockpile assets. They probably had Thabeet ranked on the top, don't see it as a knock against Marc. Just trying to stockpile talent (especially at a position of huge demand in this league).

    Nobody is spinning anything. They made a risky deal which paid out huge. All I am saying is that maybe they knew what they were doing when they made it (especially given the ties of Marc to the Grizzlies).
     
  5. T-mac&Yao=RING

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,681
    Likes Received:
    30
    Well thats pretty much my point the Lakers needed Pau.
     
  6. david_rocket

    david_rocket Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,488
    Likes Received:
    834
    Well, if you want to rest that trade, because of what things are now?
    Then dont forget the one-sided trade that got Kobe Bryant for Vlade Divac.
    If kobe were with the Hornets, they would have been in the playoffs more times than now.
     
  7. DragonGirl

    DragonGirl Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    26
    Grizzlies did NOT know Marc was going to be this good at time of trade. It was not until after the trade and during the Olympics that Marc started to look promising. No way did they think from his high school days in Memphis this kid would be good center in NBA. This is what great shape he was in during high school:

    [​IMG]

    Marc’s development helped Grizzlies to save face, but please do not tell me Grizzlies made well thought out deal at the time.
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. BleedRocketsRed

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    7,094
    Likes Received:
    611
    Lol.

    Well the deal was made when Marc started to emerge as a legit player in Europe.

    Just saying with Pau on the team, pretty sure they always had an eye on Marc.

    They had a good plan when they made the deal and clearly it worked out.
     
  9. GreatOne1978

    GreatOne1978 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2010
    Messages:
    2,874
    Likes Received:
    435
    A capable center like Andrew Bynum was apparently enough to be in 1st Place in the West before Pau arrived.
     
  10. GreatOne1978

    GreatOne1978 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2010
    Messages:
    2,874
    Likes Received:
    435
    Pau Gasol wouldn't have been an all star if Amare and Boozer were injured in 06. He was a borderline star.
     
  11. T-mac&Yao=RING

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,681
    Likes Received:
    30
    It wasnt just Bynum why the Lakers were the number one seed. But he was one of the reasons.

    If the Lakers didnt get Pau with the history of Bynum they would be sucking.
     
  12. goodbug

    goodbug Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2002
    Messages:
    2,863
    Likes Received:
    32
    Chicago didn't have any big contract at the time. And they didn't see Gasol as the franchise player. And they're totally right on that one.

     
  13. goodbug

    goodbug Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2002
    Messages:
    2,863
    Likes Received:
    32
    Lakers were a contender with healthy Bynum alone. That's why they topped the west before the Bynum went down. It's a win-win trade. Both parties are really happy, and only Lakers haters are so hurt. LOL

     
  14. Icehouse

    Icehouse Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2000
    Messages:
    13,654
    Likes Received:
    4,018
    Lotto teams don't use #2 picks to stockpile assets when they have other holes to fill. Let's just say that we never spent a top pick on a center when we had Hakeem. Same goes for any other team that has a young C they believe in and plan on keeping. Let's be real now. I can see stockpiling wings but only 1 center gets on the court.*

    The trade turned out well but if they thought Gasol was the answer they weren't picking another C that high. Most GMs don't seem to operate that way. I guarantee you the Wizards won't be picking another PG with their pick. I'll do a tip jar bet that the Clippers don't take a PF.
     
  15. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,947
    if the lakers offered Pau Gasol for Marc Gasol, Zach Randolph, Darrell Arthur, Hamed Haddadi, Greivis Vasquez and Sam Young, the Grizzlies would laugh and hang up.
     
  16. kaocsaephan

    kaocsaephan Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Messages:
    1,269
    Likes Received:
    26
    Typically, long-time members of clutchfans are intelligent.

    Yeah what you said made a lot of sense because the Pau Gasol trade directly lead to obtaining all of these players that are playing on the Grizzlies now, right? And everyone knew they'd be playing at this level, right? They also knew Randolph would resurrect his career, right? That the draft prospects would turn out to be serviceable players, too? Of course the Grizzlies knew all this. Why else would they have made the trade with so much confidence, leading to the owner publicly admitting that they could have probably gotten more for Pau Gasol had they been more patient?

    If injustice leads to a series of fortunate/favorable events, does that make all the preceding events "ok"? You couldn't justify this trade when it happened and you can't justify it now. Fortunately, things panned out for Memphis. Why can't we just move on?
     
    1 person likes this.
  17. MrButtocks

    MrButtocks Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,535
    Likes Received:
    5,758
    You can almost say the exact same thing about Boston and Seattle. "OMG, trading Ray Allen for the #5 pick was so stupid!" Boston won a championship and became a powerhouse. That's was expected, but Seattle was going nowhere with Allen and wanted to rebuild. Ditto with Memphis.
     
  18. kaocsaephan

    kaocsaephan Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Messages:
    1,269
    Likes Received:
    26
    I think a #5 pick for a 32-year-old makes more sense than a 26(?)-year-old for Kwame Brown + late draft prospects. Doesn't matter if they all turned out to be LeBrons.
     
  19. arubato

    arubato Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    680
    Likes Received:
    719
    We took Hakeem even though we have Sampson
     
  20. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    29,896
    Likes Received:
    20,043
    LOL this is ridiculous. You don't judge trades by how the players panned out, you judge them by the known information at the time. If DM traded Hayes for Dwight Howard, Scola for KG and C-bud for Lebron, and all three of them died in a jet plane crash on the way here will we call DM the worst GM ever?

    The fact is, AT THE TIME, Gasol was unknown and most people had him penciled as a bust ( reason why he was taken so late). Pau oth was a legitimate allstar, was fairly young (28?), and all the Grizz got for him was an expiring contract and...Gasol.

    To goodbug, its not that Grizz shouldn't have traded Gasol, that's fine. But when you consider the package they got for Gasol its downright ridiculous how much Jerry West raped the Grizzlies organization. As the other poster said, the scenario speaks for itself: Lakers won 2 rings and a couple of finals appearances, with a lot more to go, while the Grizzlies just made the playoffs 3 years later. Both Randolph and Gasol are the same age and more or less make the same amount of money. Difference is Gasol has no "knuckle head/cancer" genes in his head which may come up at any time.
     

Share This Page