I'm sure this topic was discussed plenty of times before, but between these two disabilities, which is worse?
How can you possibly compare the two? Blindness is a hundred times worse I think a more fair comparison is being blind vs being paralyzed Although I don't think you should compare these sort of things anyway.
I voted for deaf on accident but blind is worse. At least when you're deaf you can still play sports, look at p*rn, you know the important things in life.
Blindness is worse. Our enhanced vision as primates is one of the things that sets us apart from other animals.
I can't imagine not being able to watch the Rockets and the Texans at least when your deaf you have the luxury of not listening to bill and Clyde.
Crap!! Voted for the wrong one. But I say blindness definitely. I'd rather be able to see and not hear. I gotta be able to see a beautiful woman. :grin:
Being deaf most definitely. Because you won't be able to hear Wolf Parade's latest release Expo 86 which garnered a 7.5 rating on Pitchfork.
Who needs to hear? Feeling is just as good. http://www.diycable.com/main/product_info.php?cPath=24&products_id=692
Not really an answer, but some pretty awesome stuff <iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/xNkw28fz9u0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/r9mvRRwu5Gw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
The government thinks blindness is worse based on the additional 1150-1450 additional standard deduction.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/CD2LRROpph0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>