Hunter Biden laments Kamala Harris’ ‘painful’ book, implies Joe picked her because she’s black https://nypost.com/2025/10/23/us-ne...ok-implies-joe-picked-her-because-shes-black/
related Biden refused to speak with Obama for weeks before and after dropping out: book https://nypost.com/2025/10/24/us-ne...for-weeks-before-and-after-dropping-out-book/ excerpt: President Joe Biden spurned former President Barack Obama’s calls in the two weeks before Biden dropped his re-election bid last July — and then wouldn’t speak to his ex-boss for another month after ending his quest for a second term, according to a new book on last year’s race for the White House. Biden, now 82, served eight years as vice president to Obama, now 64, but their relationship soured as the first black president’s hand was rumored to be behind a devastating George Clooney New York Times op-ed, published July 10, 2024, that called on Biden to step aside following his disastrous June 27 debate with former President Donald Trump. The Oscar-winning actor had declared in the scathing piece that Biden “cannot win” less than a month after co-hosting a fundraiser that brought in some $30 million for the Democratic ticket, but was overshadowed by Biden freezing up during the event and having to be led offstage by Obama. more at the link
Hunter Biden's back in the news Hunter Biden claims he didn’t think ‘laptop from hell’ was really his when damning contents first revealed by The Post https://nypost.com/2025/10/24/us-ne...-didnt-think-laptop-from-hell-was-really-his/
This entire thread was premised on the allegation that the president's son illegally took advantage of his dads position and enriched himself and the president along the way. You would think all the low iq trolls @Os Trigonum @tallanvor @basso @Bandwagoner @Astrodome @Commodore who spammed this thread would be concerned now that its actually happening exactly how they feared it was under Biden Of course none of those losers actually cared about blantant corruption
Thread was originally called “nobody cares about hunter biden” or something like that. I made it because the nothingburgerness of it imo was boring. Your little boyfriends spammed the living daylights out of it with maga garabage so I renamed it in their honor. Go **** youself.
This thread is filled with nothing but MAGATs spewing Hunter biden conspiracies pretending that political corruption was the most important issue in the world. Now that their orange messiah is corrupt to a level we've never seen they all hide like losers. My point stands
gift link no paywall Biden Has Raised Little of What He Needs to Build a Presidential Library His library foundation has told the I.R.S. that by the end of 2027 it expects to bring in just $11.3 million — not nearly enough for a traditional presidential library. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/13/...e_code=1.8U8.KB1q.aupjlVx6HKa2&smid=url-share excerpt: John Morgan, a longtime Democratic donor who was one of Mr. Biden’s top bundlers, said he would not give “a penny” to the former president’s library, citing poor treatment from Mr. Biden’s staff. “The Biden staff, they ruined any type of good library for him,” Mr. Morgan said. “He’ll be lucky to have a bookmobile.” more at the link
While Trump is soliciting bribes for his library in exchange for favors lol and you dumbasses claimed Biden was corrupt. The biggest mistake biden made was actually not being corrupt. Every single MAGA in this thread has been exposed as a grifter including the biggest dumbass @Os Trigonum
free link no paywall The Verdict on Biden Is In https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/16/...e_code=1.qlA.8boc.pwVPWpou7zsQ&smid=url-share excerpt: No matter how desperately Democrats may want to move beyond them, or just forget about them altogether, the Bidens keep popping up. Jill has a memoir out (“View From the East Wing”), and Joe is working on one, too. Hunter emotes all over social media, and the Democratic National Committee has grudgingly released a report blaming Kamala Harris’s 2024 defeat in part on her reluctance to break with her old boss. On the final page of her book, Jill makes plain that the Bidens are determined to stick around: “As Dylan Thomas wrote, we will not go gentle into that good night, but rage, rage against the dying of the light.” Nothing like quoting from a poem about defiance in the face of age and mortality to remind people of what went wrong with Joseph R. Biden Jr. Maybe they’re hanging around because they feel that they never got their due. The Biden presidency was an odd one, overshadowed by the man who would be both its predecessor and its successor. During the four years that the Bidens lived in the White House, we all still lived in the so-called Trump era. Joe, whose eternal quest for the White House had a whiff of the obsessive, never even got a raucous, balloon-dropping convention, first because of Covid and then because he was out. Now, almost exactly two years removed from the debate night that ended Biden’s political career, can his presidency be judged on its own merits, or did Biden matter mainly because he denied Donald Trump a second term — and then handed him one? In “The Presidency of Joseph R. Biden: A First Historical Assessment,” a collection of historians and social scientists, led by Julian Zelizer of Princeton University, takes an early cut, and the judgments draw blood. The administration was “an ominous interregnum,” writes one; Biden was “better suited for a time gone by,” offers another; his presidency “ended somewhere between tragedy and farce,” concludes one more. The book is the latest in a Princeton University Press series passing judgment on recently departed U.S. presidents (Zelizer edited similar volumes on Trump, Barack Obama and George W. Bush), and its chapters methodically review the Biden administration’s record on policy and politics: The battles with the Supreme Court and the efforts to prosecute the Jan. 6 rioters. Biden’s equity agenda in education and racial justice. The failings of “Bidenomics” and the pandemic crisis. The fights over transgender rights — which the president called “the civil rights issue of our time” — and border security. The challenges posed by China and Russia. And the two fateful withdrawals, one from Afghanistan, the other from the 2024 race. Taken together, the historians’ assessments point to a recurring challenge for Biden: His substantive defeats at times offered temporary political advantages, but his major successes failed to deliver sustained political benefits. And that is how you become a one-term president. more at the link
LMAO. This shameless boomer spent the entire Biden era cosplaying as a anti corruption free speech warrior only to disappear when we see the most corrupt anti free speech admin in history. What a slimy loser you are. Youre so shameless at bumping this thread exposing just how braindead your conspiraces were. You alongside the other grifter @StupidMoniker did nothing other than embarrassing yourself
another good read. free link, no paywall Here’s the real Democratic autopsy Why did the party lose in ’24? Neither Jill Biden’s memoir nor the DNC’s postmortem has the answer. https://wapo.st/4oxbAma excerpt: Jill Biden had the chance to come clean. She could’ve used her new memoir, “View From the East Wing,” to write about the former first family’s role in allowing Donald Trump to return to the White House. Instead, the public has learned that the Bidens live in an alternate universe in which they made no mistakes and the country isn’t paying for their decisions. A good political rule of thumb is that a handful of moments determine the outcome of an election, and they seldom happen in a campaign’s final days or weeks. That held true in 2024. There were three decisions President Joe Biden made that ultimately determined his party’s fate. more at the link
