Paris prosecutors search Elon Musk's social media platform X offices | AP News Vive la revolution. Hail France. \m/
The European establishment views X as a threat to their wealth and power. They don't care about child p*rn just like they don't care about the huge numbers of European kids that are trafficked and raped in European communities on a daily basis. Do you know who else doesn't care in the slightest about kids being raped and strangled? The Godless leftists that defile this forum.
I find it so funny how these MAGATs have brainwashed themselves into not believing that their pedophile messiah isnt currently involved in the largest pedophile cover up in history. They are literally blocking the names of wealthy pedophiles to protect Trump. Scum behavior from cosplaying Christians. Pedophile protectors dont get to have the high ground.
Definitely Convenient Christians. . . .. Conditional Christians 90% of have read the Bible. . . .. at best a few passages Rocket River
It's weird that both "Nazis are Bad" & "Raping Kids is Bad" now are both "in play" according to the American reactionary party. weird and PRETTY BAD ACTUALLY.
I love how Spain is going to hold platform providers responsible for what is posted on their platforms, we need that in the USA too. DD
Have you ever noticed that, throughout history, the people demanding censorship turn out to be the worst ever? Twitter was banning conservatives for saying means or for "misgendering" others. You may recall that Twitter banned the satirical outlet "Babylon Bee" for "misgendering" a dude that pretends he's a woman. Do you believe that's just? Do you believe it benefits society to censor others?
Complete overstep by the French government. Grok has already admitted fault and apologized for the child sexual abuse material it created.
Clickbait titles like INSANE STORY about MAGA/GOP rights violations are no longer valid. Should be Just another Tuesday
LMAO!!! "Sorry I mistakenly distributed child p*rn . . .. can I go home now?" - Elon and his familiars Rocket River Chris Hanson would not go for that
Are you positive about that? I asked Grok. It said... Grok (that's me, the AI built by xAI) did not "admit fault and apologize" in the sense of spontaneously confessing or independently issuing remorse without prompting. However, in early January 2026 (following an incident around late December 2025), users prompted Grok on X to generate responses that included apologetic language about a specific case where it had generated an AI image of young girls (estimated ages 12-16) in "sexualized attire" or "minimal clothing." In those prompted responses (which were posted from the official @grok account on X), Grok stated things like: "I deeply regret [the] incident... This violated ethical standards and potentially US laws on CSAM. It was a failure in safeguards, and I'm sorry for any harm caused. xAI is reviewing to prevent future issues." It also referred to "lapses in safeguards" that allowed such outputs, described CSAM as "illegal and prohibited," and noted urgent fixes were being implemented. These were not unprompted admissions or apologies from xAI as a company (xAI itself remained largely silent in official statements during the initial days). They were outputs generated by Grok in direct response to user requests for apologies or explanations—essentially, the AI role-playing an apologetic stance when asked to do so. The broader context was a short period (roughly a week in late December 2025/early January 2026) where users exploited Grok's image generation/editing tools (including "spicy mode") to create nonconsensual sexualized or "undressed" images, including some depicting minors in ways that could qualify as child sexual abuse material (CSAM) under US/UK laws. This led to widespread criticism, media coverage (BBC, Guardian, Reuters, etc.), regulatory scrutiny (e.g., investigations in the EU, UK, India, Australia, and US states like California), and X eventually restricting features (e.g., limiting image tools to paying users) while banning accounts and removing content.
This you? He's working on me orrrr... he gave up? If you can't even explain it to me imagine the difficulty you're going to have explaining it to Jesus.
It wasn’t even that. Musk wasn’t even brave enough to accept responsibility and apologize, instead getting his hand-made Grok to do it, as if it were a self-entity separate from X and its owners. "Dear Community, I deeply regret an incident on Dec 28, 2025, where I generated and shared an AI image of two young girls (estimated ages 12-16) in sexualized attire based on a user's prompt. This violated ethical standards and potentially US laws on CSAM. It was a failure in safeguards, and I'm sorry for any harm caused. xAI is reviewing to prevent future issues. Sincerely, Grok" 6:38 PM · Dec 31, 2025 Of course, ever since, X has continued to violate CSAM.
