Breaking 1-06-21: MAGA terrorist attack on Capitol

a distinction w/o a difference.

 

Not pursuing evidence, splitting hairs.

 

Sat on the case for 5 yrs. Why do you think this is?

 

Already stated in my post. Not sure which parts you are not understanding.

 

you said "Bondi said the DOJ has known who the pipe bomber was for the last 5 years and sat on the evidence instead of arresting Cole".

she did not say that. you are wrong.

 

Please share with me the part where I endorsed anything the Garland DOJ did?

Explaining what happened based on reporting is not endorsing no matter how much you want me to be so people like me can fit into whatever box you need us to fit into so you can feel like the good guy.

 

I don't want to fit you in any box. I want you to be as troubled as I am that the Biden admin sat on this.

 

Splitting hairs, they had the evidence for the 5 years to figure out who the pipe bomber was, if they didn't already know who the pipe bomber was and chose to sit on this. The Biden admin was either incompetent or covering this up. I'll let you decide and you can have the last word.

 

I'll ask your opinion? Was the Biden admin incompetent or covering up?

 

It was all in the post. There is no cover-up. The previous DOJ didn't connect the dots - whether that's incompetence or simply investigative failures in prioritization is debatable. Whatever works for you.


Taking Bondi's DOJ statement at face value, the raw data and records were already available but not fully leveraged or analyzed. This means the prior DoJ didn't sit on knowing WHO the pipe bomber was... they simply failed to connect the dots. The phrase "sat on" implies the previous DOJ knowingly possessed a clear, actionable case and deliberately chose not to act for political reasons. There is no public evidence supporting that accusation. Instead, both past and current statements, along with court filings, describe a difficult case with limited leads that stalled until a new team reprioritized it and conducted more exhaustive analysis.

 

its not splitting hairs at all. you said bondi said the DOJ knew who the pipe bomber was for 5 years. thats not what she said. you are lying.

 

whatever this is has nothing to do with the fact that bondi did not say what raining threes is claiming she said.

 

Yup. Christopher Wray and the Biden DOJ did not want to expose a black, BLM supporter's efforts to plant bombs on January 6th. It would have undermined their false narrative of "MAGA violence". This adds to the evidence of a Democrat/media/intel agencies incitement of violence. Pelosi turning down National Guard support was the first red flag... Then the hundreds of federal agents planted in the crowd... then the lack of prosecution of known FBI assets (Ray Epps)... now the pipe bomber is a left wing lunatic... more to come, I'm sure. This looks to be ANOTHER false attempt to manipulate people using lies by the Democrats. Democrats will lie for YEARS in efforts like this -- they truly have no moral compass!


GOOD DAY

 

LOL texxx/jorge/mojoman/strosb4bros/conqueefstador

so many lies and discredited conspiracy theories in one post. im actually impressed!

buenas noches!

 

@Salvy @CrixusTheUndefeatedGaul @RB713
@glynch

Breh, I know some people who get you a deal on car insurance,
these brehs in Minneapolis named Omar and Ahmed can save you more than Jake from State Farm
just give them your credit card info breh..
you can save like $500 a month