Yes, I ****ing realize that. I was trolling. The quality of my post reflects my thoughts on the quality of the stupid ****ing discussions being had in here following a fantastic win over a divisional rival that I ****ing hate. Sorry you think CJ suckz and go Texans.
You always get so emotional. You can’t name one time where I said CJ sucks, if you can’t have a discussion without controlling your emotions or being objective that’s on you. Was simply saying CJ hasn’t been good, like some of the posters here. He’s been average.
No, you’re saying the guy who has cherry picked specific games to make it seem like CJ has been good to great overall-even better than Josh Allen was being nuanced. Some of “you” have zero objectivity.
Nice. Well, it’s not really my job or concern to worry about the level of emotion you perceive from my posts. Sorry if I upset you with the PG-13 words. It’s just that I find incompetence highly frustrating. Brb need to do some more anger management therapy bc I’m too motional on klutchfanz.
Incompetence? More like your lack of any understanding and always wanting to add your input when not asked for. Objectivity is lacking. But you do you, therapy might be needed for your anger issues.
“And his worst performances have come against elite defenses. Generally speaking, that's how it works. Great teams/players... they feast on the bad (of which, there are generally more) and break-even with the good. This formula has been in place for literally centuries. Again, you watched "elite" Josh Allen against our defense, right?...” That was the post I replied to^^ And somehow your brain jumps to the conclusion that I think CJ is better than Josh Allen. No he’s not…. Literally everyone knows this. But the point that even the best QBs are worse overall against good defenses is completely valid. You continue to bring up cherry picking and yet that’s literally all you are doing. Cherry picking bad performances, removing any good performances by casting each one aside for one technicality or the other. It’s not worth doing this though. I’m not going to sit here and argue that CJs been a top QB or anything. He’s played some great games, some average ones, and some bad ones. I think he’s an above average QB. You think he’s “average.” So be it.
Do you read the posts you respond to? Hey Now and I were having a discussion, where he was comparing Allen and CJ. Not me. I have been very clear, CJ has been extremely up and down. On the whole, that means average. Which is where he has been for the past two seasons.
No, you interpreted it in your biased way. I simply gave the facts. I don’t care about CJs concussions. He was up and down before the concussions, they aren’t an excuse
Oh did I speak out of turn? It’s a message board, I’m going to reply to whatever and whomever I please. That is kind of how this works in case you had a “lack of any understanding” of where you are. I’m fairly certain you don’t even understand my position on really anything to be able to truly characterize my thoughts on it, so your assessment of lack of objectivity doesn’t really hold much merit.
Yes I did, responding to a singular post in a chain does not automatically mean you agree with every single position from the earlier posts. Does one really need to explain this to ostensibly another adult?
It’s very easy to assess your thoughts. Any objective critique, or further critical than your “middle ground” opinion on CJ is crossing some imaginary line you arbitrarily created. You pick and choose what segments you respond to without context, hop in and pick a side that favors CJ. All while pretending to be neutral. Any objective sports fan, can clearly see CJ has not been the same player he was as a rookie. His upside seems to be upper tier game manager like Dak and Goff. Another conversation you had your snarky input in. Anyone thinking there’s a difference between those two has an agenda.
