From the article (sort of reminds me when people confuse weather with climate): Dr Mark England, who led the study while at the University of Exeter, said: “It is surprising, when there is a current debate about whether global warming is accelerating, that we’re talking about a slowdown. “The good news is that 10 to 15 years ago when sea ice loss was accelerating, some people were talking about an ice-free Arctic before 2020. But now the [natural] variability has switched to largely cancelling out sea ice loss. It has bought us a bit more time but it is a temporary reprieve – when it ends, it isn’t good news.” The research, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, used two different datasets of Arctic sea ice levels from 1979 to the present day. The scientists analysed the sea ice area for every month of the year and the slowdown was seen in all cases.
reading comprehension is fundamental 3.2 Comprehensive Climate Models Suggest 20-Year Pauses Are Not Rare To understand whether comprehensive climate models can simulate a multi-decadal pause of Arctic sea ice loss, we search through the CMIP5 and CMIP6 large ensemble archive to identify members which exhibit ice loss pauses. Consistent with previous studies (Kay et al., 2011; Lee & Liu, 2023; Swart et al., 2015), we find that nearly all models can simulate reductions in September Arctic sea ice area smaller than observed during the period 2005–2024. The two models which do not feature any such trends, UKESM1-0-LL and CanESM5-1, are both models with large climate sensitivities (Meehl et al., 2020), for which overly strong anthropogenically-forced sea ice loss does not allow for pauses such as the observed one. Figure 2a shows the percentage of members with less sea ice loss than observed. The main result here is that the multi-model average suggests a nearly 20% chance of this pause in Arctic sea ice loss (Figure 2a, column 1). However, we note a large spread across the CMIP5 and CMIP6 models, with the probability of a smaller-than-observed 2005–2024 trend varying from 0% and approximately 40%.
Wildfire Smoke Will Kill Thousands More by 2050, Study Finds - The New York Times Pollution from fires, intensified by rising temperatures, is on track to become one of America’s deadliest climate disasters. If the planet continues to warm at its current rate, exposure to wildfire smoke will kill an estimated 70,000 Americans each year by 2050, according to new research. The results are some of the strongest evidence yet that climate change endangers people in the United States, said Marshall Burke, an environmental economist at Stanford University who contributed to the study. For Americans, “the impacts are much larger than anything else that has been measured,” Dr. Burke said. Wildfire smoke, intensified by rising temperatures, is on track to become one of America’s deadliest climate disasters, causing as many as two million deaths over the next three decades, the analysis found. Published Thursday in the journal Nature, it is the most robust estimate yet of how deadly wildfire smoke could become as the planet warms. The researchers used roughly two decades of death records and satellite and ground data on wildfire smoke pollution to measure how exposure affects mortality. “This paper is a wake-up call for people,” said Kai Chen, an associate professor at the Yale School of Public Health, who was not involved in the study. “It shows this is a nationwide problem, and it’s tied to climate change.” ...
@basso @Salvy @glynch @jo mama @RB713 @ROXRAN lol these dummies polluting the ocean like the Exxon Valdese
Trump is doing everything in his power to stop the US from having cleaner, cheaper energy. Trump is handing out public land and millions of dollars to revive big coal, sending advocates reeling While the Trump administration wages war against clean energy, it is now vowing to lease millions of acres of public lands at a discount and spend hundreds of millions of dollars to prop up the most polluting source of electricity: coal. This comes as the administration has restricted new solar and wind farms on federal lands, and decried subsidies provided to these two renewable energy sources. The new policies announced Monday include giving $625 million to utilities to extend the life of aging, coal-fired power plants. Such facilities would likely otherwise close because of the availability of cheaper energy sources. https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/30/climate/coal-power-trump-public-lands The Trump administration canceled $7.5 billion in clean energy funding, affecting 16 states, including $1.1 billion for Washington. Washington's Pacific Northwest Hydrogen Hub lost $1 billion, impacting 11 energy projects and companies like WSU and PACCAR. Lawmakers claim the cuts are politically motivated, targeting blue states, and are considering legal action to challenge the decision. https://www.fox13seattle.com/news/trump-cancels-1-billion-wa-energy-projects The cuts come to states which voted for Democrat Kamala Harris in last year's presidential election. Revenge and ignorance fuel Trump.
I didn't write that headline, but the articles shows that Trump is not only a fool, but a dangerous hateful old man who forces Americans to live with his stupid, toxic, and backwards ideas for no logical reason.
Why is Texas, who was once recently the US leader in "alternative energy production" trying to curtail that industry?
it' a weird kind of abduction that allows the abductee to tape videos of whatever she wants and upload them to the internet.
@glynch @jo mama @Salvy @raining threes @ROXRAN @RB713 @Commodore Free yacht trips to the mediterranean and free flights back internet and phone access when you are abducted sounds dope breh!!! FWWEEE GHAZUUUHHH
