1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Official] Censorship from governmental actors thread

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Os Trigonum, May 28, 2021.

?

Who does it better?

  1. Sweet Lou 42

    40.7%
  2. tinman

    59.3%
  1. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    82,839
    Likes Received:
    122,992
    I put on my lemon juice this morning, I'm invisible

    lemon juice .png
     
  2. astros123

    astros123 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Messages:
    15,206
    Likes Received:
    13,071
    "
    Although Facebook took various actions with regard to social media posts by Hines and her group, including restricting her account after she posted an article about increased rates of myocarditis in teenagers who received the COVID-19 vaccine, Barrett acknowledged, “Facebook was targeting her pages before almost all of its communications with the White House and the CDC, which weakens the inference that her subsequent restrictions are likely traceable to ‘government-coerced enforcement’ of Facebook’s policies.”

    https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/...influence-on-social-media-content-moderation/

    Again MAGATs the suprme court already ruled the Biden admin did not pressure the companies with any consequences or they did not force any sort of behavior change.

    Your opinion alongside the other MAGAT @Os Trigonum dont matter. The facts are the only thing thats important
     
  3. El_Conquistador

    El_Conquistador King of the D&D, The Legend, #1 Ranking

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    16,275
    Likes Received:
    6,955
    That SCOTUS case is only loosely related to the issue at hand... and SCOTUS said that the plaintiff didn't have standing. This is GOOGLE, not FACEBOOK that we are talking about. So many mistakes with your post and logic...

    Oh, and Google admitted that they were pressured to ban/cancel conservatives. They admitted it to the House Judiciary Committee. That ends your argument completely. And your argument was only tangentially related to begin with.


    CLEAN WIN -- EL_CONQUISTADOR
     
  4. astros123

    astros123 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Messages:
    15,206
    Likes Received:
    13,071
    The court ruled they had no standing because they could not show any damages that they occurred from the admin. The court could not find any instances in which the admin forced them to change behavior. Nothing

    Why the **** do i care what Google lawyer have to say? Meta's lawyers claimed they didnt sell private information to advertisers and then we learned about Cambridge analytics. I dont give a damn what corporate lawyers have to say.

    Do you sincerely have down syndrome or some learning disability? What in the hell did you win? You havnt proved anything . Clown
     
    Sajan likes this.
  5. Sajan

    Sajan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2009
    Messages:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    7,444
    Isn't it obvious you have to have some sort of mental disability to be a MAGAt?
     
    astros123 likes this.
  6. ThatBoyNick

    ThatBoyNick Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    31,763
    Likes Received:
    49,768
    Alright I got a little story

    I'm 16, talking to my moms boyfriend. To preface him, successful business person, took care of his body, dressed well, well spoken, just an all round ver respectable and well put together person.

    We're talking about acne, I had it bad, he had it bad when he was a teen. He tells me "When I was in school another kid gave me a tip, it worked for me, maybe it could work for you... try washing your face with your urine, I would do it in the shower, I think it really helped me"

    I was in complete shock, and responded to him "You know he was probably ****ing with you right? Like hey kid rub piss in your face" and his face dropped and I could tell he had never considered that once in his life.
     
  7. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    82,839
    Likes Received:
    122,992
    the full letter from Google's legal representation is here:

    https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/e...o-media-document/2025-09-23-letter-to-hjc.pdf

    excerpt:

    Screenshot 2025-09-23 at 4.16.00 PM.png
    more at the link
     
  8. astros123

    astros123 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Messages:
    15,206
    Likes Received:
    13,071
    In a court of law when you actually have to prove your allegations googles lawyers weren't able to provide a single shred of evidence that showed anyone from the biden pressured them to do anything.

    Google lawyers know that the people reading the letter are low iq partisan losers @Os Trigonum who wont ask for evidence so why not make up claims to bring you goodwill lol.
     
  9. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    82,839
    Likes Received:
    122,992
    Screenshot 2025-09-23 at 4.30.28 PM.png
     
  10. astros123

    astros123 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Messages:
    15,206
    Likes Received:
    13,071
    Jim jordan who has received millions of dollars of donations from Big tech and is in their pocketbook lol. Every day the right wingers on these forums show the world just how utterly stupid they are.

    Big tech lawyers failed to prove in a court of law any suppression or harm they suffered from the Biden admin. They play you like a fiddle cuz they know youre an idiot
     

Share This Page